Jayhawkers After The Civil War Essay

After the bill was passed, pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters rushed in to settle in Kansas to affect the outcome of the first election. Pro-slavery settlers won the election, but were charged with fraud by anti-slavery settlers. The anti-slavery settlers held another election, but the pro-slavery settlers refused to vote. This resulted in two opposing legislatures within the Kansas territory. The opposition created violence between the two groups, causing many bloody battles that greatly increased the death rate, giving Kansas the nickname “Bleeding Kansas”. President Pierce, supporting pro-slavery, sent in Federal troops to stop the violence and disperse the anti-slavery legislature. Another election was held and pro-slavery supporters won. They were again charged with election fraud. As a result, Congress did not recognize the constitution the pro-slavery settlers adopted, and Kansas wasn’t allowed to become a state. Eventually,

The name Civil War is misleading because the war was not a class struggle, but a sectional combat, having its roots in political, economic, social, and psychological elements. It has been characterized, in the words of William H. Seward, as the “irrepressible conflict.” In another judgment the Civil War was viewed as criminally stupid, an unnecessary bloodletting brought on by arrogant extremists and blundering politicians. Both views accept the fact that in 1861 there existed a situation that, rightly or wrongly, had come to be regarded as insoluble by peaceful means.

Three main events happened during Bleeding Kansas that influenced the Civil War. First, the Sack of Lawrence took place. The pro-slavery government in Kansas charged the anti-slavery government with treason. (Kansas had two governments. One was pro-slavery and the other anti-slavery.) Around eight-hundred men were sent to Lawrence to capture the anti-slavery leaders and found that they had fled. In anger, the group set the city on fire, ransacked buildings, and destroyed presses that printed anti-slavery newspapers. This infuriated the anti-slavery Americans

This meant that there was a possibility of there being slavery in the new territories based on the decision of the people in those territories. This would allow for the spread of slavery which in turn would expand the slave trade helping slaveholders in the South. Popular sovereignty increased sectionalism instead of reducing it. In Kansas, the vote for slavery was bombarded by people who did not live in the state causing an incorrect evaluation of what the people wanted. This led to the creation of a second illegal government and fighting between the two different governments. This fight was so bad that Kansas became known as "Bleeding Kansas".

How Bleeding Kansas influenced the economy of the territory is,this constant conflict only deteriorated the economy.The plundering of towns that cost thousands to repaired made the economy sick. Also Missourians crossed the border of the Kansas territory and took over polling towns. They made it to were anti slavery people couldn’t vote for government,even with their efforts a pro slavery government was elected anyway.("From the Kansas-Nebraska").

Finally, the issue of “Bloody Kansas” was a major political factor caused by westward expansion. Once it was resolved that Kansas’s stance on slavery would be determined by popular sovereignty, people flocked to Kansas to make their vote count. The “Border Ruffians” won the controversial vote, which resulted in Kansas being a slave state. However, the abolitionists refused to recognize the pro-slavery government, so they set up a second provincial government in Topeka, Kansas. This episode led to a skirmish between the Ruffians and the abolitionists, like in Lawrence, Kansas in May of 1856. This was a prelude to the actual civil war and showed that even if there was a “fair” vote to determine a Territories slave law, it didn’t mean that all the people would abide by the law. These political episodes involving the ever expanding west showed the weakness of the Union.

Acquiring the Nebraskan territory brought along its’ own set of problems for Congress. By the Union gaining these states, the balance between free and slave states was once again thrown off. Douglas once more showed up to find a sort of compromise and help his presidential campaign. He opted to repeal the Missouri Compromise restriction by giving the two new states the popular vote. He believed that these new states would not vote to be slave states and would help him further his work on the railroad. Many turned against him, viewing this as an attempt to only gain power and help his own political agenda. This act created by Douglas once again opened the topic of slavery and in response the Massachusetts Emigrant Aid Society was formed. This society was created to move free-soilers into Kansas for the vote. Along with these free-soil settlers, many Missouri slave holders had found their way to Kansas. Those from Missouri believed they needed to do anything in their power to make Kansas a slave state, even if it meant killing abolitionists. Missourians flooded Kansas twice to vote proslavery and ended up giving Kansas two governments. With Congress only sending investigators to find out more about the illegal elections, furor across the state grew rapidly. Both sides believed it to be their divine right to control Kansas. “Bleeding Kansas” began in 1856 when a

In the early 1820’s Missouri wanted to be admitted into the Union. At this time the twenty-two states in America were evenly divided into two groups. The “slave” states whose state constitutions allowed slavery, and the “free” states whose state constitutions did not allow slavery. Each side had eleven states, making the balance between the parties’ power in the Senate equal. Missouri’s state constitution allowed slavery and admitting Missouri to the Union would have given the slave states more power in the Senate. The “free” states were against this happening. Henry Clay

That’s why Bleeding Kansas was so important to American Bleeding Kansas was very important to American history and the civil war, because It decided whether or not Kansas would be a free state, it also was important to American history because the violence led to the Civil war. So next time you’re wondering what started the war think of bleeding

About 180,000 African American people comprised 163 units that served in the Union Army, during the time of the Civil War, and many more African American people had served in the Union Navy. Both the free African-Americans and the runaway slaves had joined the fight. On the date of July 17, in the year of 1862, the U. S. Congress had passed two very important acts that would allow the enlistment of many African Americans, but the official enrollment had occurred only after the September, 1862, issuance of the, Emancipation Proclamation. In general, most white soldiers and officers, had believed that most of the black men, who had served in the Civil War, lacked the courage, and the will to fight

Crash! Boom! Terrified screams and rifle shots filled the air as Margaret snatched up her baby sister into her arms as she ran around frantically in search of shelter. Finally finding a safe hiding spot behind a large rock, Margaret and her little sister watched in desperation as their small shack was ransacked by John Brown and his raiders. As the sky grew black with smoke, angry tears began streaming down Margaret’s face. Why can’t the anti-slavery settlers just leave us alone? Why are they being so violent? What have we done to them? All we want is land to settle on! Margaret wondered in disheartenment. For settlers who had rushed to claim land in Kansas and Nebraska in the stormy 1850’s, facing violent clashes had become a daily

In 1861, the American Civil War commenced after many years of tension building between the Northern and Southern states. The main reason of the tension was said to be the debate of slavery between the North and South, and although some documents support this claim, it is false. The war had been brewing since 1607, before slavery was even introduced to the colonies that would become the United States of America. The debate of slavery did play a major part in the civil war; however it did so in supporting the true cause of the civil war. The main cause of the American Civil War was not the debate of slavery, but rather Europe’s role in the American economy.

The aftermath of the Civil War shook the nation. A new way of life was beginning for the people of America. A way of life that was beautiful and free to some and absolutely devastating to the rest. The country had changed and nobody did a better job at documenting this change than the authors. The authors used this new world to explore new and unique stories as well as capturing what it was actually like living in the post-Civil War times. This paper will examine post-Civil War Literature and its importance to documenting this period in history.

In the Civil War the North had many advantages over the South. The South was outnumbered, out supplied, and pushed into a corner using military tactics. Many things changed because of the Civil War. The military tactics used by the North changed how war was fought from then on. Many changes were made politically; some were only temporary, while others were permanent. After the war was over, the country was reunited and the image of the soul and duty of our country redefined.

What challenges did the “new immigrants” face (those arriving between 1877 and 1914) that previous waves of immigrants did not?  (Discuss at least 2 challenges.)