Jean Baptiste de Lamarck and Charles Darwin were Historical Evolutionary Scientists

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) was a British naturalist who became famous for his theories in evolution. He believed all species evolved form a common ancestor and that evolution happened through a process called natural selection, which meant survival of the fittest. In the BNW, the different castes of people were made from a common ancestor (a single individual). Thus, creating hundreds of his or her clones. Since the directors believed in survival of the fittest, they made the best kind of people so that they may live long in a specific environment.

Darwin’s theory of evolution was a ground-breaking discovery for the study of life. Although Darwin gets most of the credit for the discovery his influences Charles Lyell, the father of geology and Erasmus Darwin, a pre-Darwinian evolutionist, made great contributions to the theory. The majority of the scientific community was quite receptive to Darwin’s evolution by natural selection theory because it provided an explanation for many things that the current origin of life theory, special creation, did not. The scientific community did have some trouble accepting his work because it did not describe how the evolving genes were transferred from generation to generation which was a very important piece of information that would solidify his for

Charles Darwin was an influential ideologist, known as the father of evolution. He created the theory of evolution in which species change overtime through what he called natural selection. Natural selection is the process when organisms that are better adapted to their environment survive and pass on their genetics. In The Descent of Man, Darwin explains various topics such as the similarities between races, the relevance of evolution in society, and the process of sexual selection. Ideas of The Descent of Man, were explored before Darwin, but what sets him apart is that he wanted to find the origin of man and ape as opposed to just stating similarities and differences. The theories that Darwin created contributed knowledge to evolution as

Darwin’s theory of evolution was along the lines of all life being related- each descending from a common ancestor. His theory presumes the development of life from non-life and suggests purely naturistic

More so that the smaller lizards were more probable to die off despite the the lack of natural selection, but because the larger stronger lizards in certain areas still had more access to food. the particular lizards with longer legs had the advantage because they were able to climb trees to escape storms that came and reach food better which in return wasn’t available to the rest down below. More great examples of this are humans, cheetahs, and peacocks. Evolution is in basic terms the matter of survival and reproduction. It is the process that on a regular basis shapes and molds all of life on our earth. Charles Darwin’s concepts comes down to three principles which include: There must be a difference in the individuals within the population, certain individuals must reproduce at a faster and higher rate than the others, and lastly characteristics that helped them survive must be passed on to there offspring. According to Darwin’s theories people are sexually selected. meaning all of sexual selection is all of natural selection. People preference of one sex affect the evolution of the other sex. for example the better you can dance the better fertile you are and vise versa. Dancing in many species means that the better you can dance the better you are off because the quality of dance is the symbol of being more reproductive. Many of his colleagues at the time were feeling dumb for not

Both theories suggest that a species changes over time to be able to better adapt to an environment. Though Lamarck thought that the entire population of that species would evolve as one, i.e. all offspring changes together with same adaptation. Darwin concluded that only the specimen with the mutation or an altered version of a feature to evolve a species as they would be able to adapt and survive easier than those without it, thus causing the “unevolved” to die off while the “evolved” lived. Over many many generations the species keeps evolving until it has perfected the new trait, also becoming a new

Even though their actual discoveries differed, Charles Darwin and the Leakeys are both similar in the sense that the two are significant contributors to the understanding of our origins. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is responsible for explaining where all living things came from, as well as how they became exquisitely adapted to their particular environments. Whereas, the Leakeys

comes from and how they evolved in the manner that they did. This type of

Charles Darwin believed in Evolution and natural selection. Evolution according to Charles Darwin was that all life is related in some way and has descended from a common ancestor. As random genetic mutations occur in an organism’s genetic code, the beneficial mutations aid in survival – this is called natural selection. Organisms that develop random mutations are better adapted to their environment and tend to survive and produce more offspring. Lamarck’s viewpoint on evolution was the law of use and disuse. He hypothesised that organisms react to changes in their environment by changing or strengthening a certain organ. Whilst an organ will stop working or disappear if it is stopped being used. The fault is this theory was that it could not explain how these strengthened or unused organs are passed on to other generations of the same organism. Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is right, but Lamarck wasn’t far off the mark. A good example of Lamarck’s law of use and disuse in the Homo sapiens is that of the appendix. The appendix is an organ which is commonly believed to have ‘stopped working’, this organ was the remnant of large fermenting gut for plant life. This organ has ceased to work as Homo sapiens have stopped eating plant matter and started to eat organisms consisting of meat. This somewhat strengthens Lamarck’s

Charles Darwin, born in Shrewsbury, England, was known for his studies around the world that led to the discovery of evolution. His views on “natural selection” were very broad and justified. He is known as a naturalist and the world to form biological change. Natural selection is when living organisms adapt to the environment they live in to try and live longer.

comes from and how they evolved in the manner that they did. This type of

Lamarck believed that a population of individuals all of the same kind (identical characteristics in all members). Individuals capable of transformation. Whereas Darwin thought that a population of interbreeding individuals with similar characteristics, though variation is common among all of them at all times. Individuals fixed and unchanging. Population capable of transformation. For example Lamarck also thought that if a giraffe

Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace two different people yet one same idea. Charles Robert Darwin was an english naturalist whose theory of evolution by natural selection is defined as the “foundation of modern evolutionary theories.” Darwin and Wallace both lived during the same period of time in the mid 1800’s and both studied natures theory of evolution. Let us get into the evolution of Mister Charles Darwin. Alfred Russel Wallace was another English naturalist who also came up with the idea of evolution by natural selection at about the same time as Darwin. Darwin began his bold discoveries after a voyage around the world in 1837 through 1839, where he spent around twenty years on his studies of his theories, in which he waited almost two decades to unleash his discoveries.

Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace like so many of their predecessors made observations of natural phenomena that inspired proposals of how life on earth evolved, unlike others these men formed plausible explanations of how the changes in populations occurred without having any knowledge of Mendelian genetics which was presented in 1868, and provided the micro-mechanism for evolution that Darwin could never explain with his theory of Pangenesis. Rather, based solely on the observations each made over time observing different species of populations around the world, both men were able to pen the ideals that would serve as the foundation of the modern theory of evolution.

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1755-1829) is one of the best-known early evolutionists, holding a belief that evolution was a continuous development and strived toward greater complexity and perfection. Through which, his theory of evolution was that living organisms evolved in a unceasingly up ward direction, from dead matter, through simple to more complex forms and towards human “perfection” (Nesci.edu, 2015). From his theories of Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics; where organisms adapt to their environments and those changes were passed onto their off springs (Corbis, 2001), to his theories of Use and Disuse, where organisms that are not used progressively disappear (Evolution.berkeley.edu, 2015). Lamarck was the first biologist to publish