Jeffersonian And Jacksonian Democracy

true liberty and equality, the millions of women. Blacks, Native Americans, immigrants, and other minorities in America continued to languish in a society that ignored their rights. Furthermore, during the Age of Jackson, enslavement of Blacks, the ultimate form of inequality, was at a new high in America. At the same time, enormous disparities of wealth existed between rich merchants, industrialists and planters, and their lowly workers: immigrants. Blacks, and the common man. While these contradictions typified America, Jacksonian democrats viewed themselves as guardians of the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of opportunity. But how could anyone be a successful guardian of these ideals while contradictions such as those previously mentioned exist? The answer is that Jackson and his followers must have been what they said they were only to a certain extent. The Jacksonian Democrats were, to some extent, champions of the Constitution, democracy, liberty, and equality.

In the span of 20 years, 42 states elected by the people, and 27 states elected by the legislature. (Document 1). The election of Jackson was considered a “revolution,” because of its peaceful transfer of power. This revolution was different from any other, because it was achieved by ballots rather than bullets. Jacksonians cried, “Shall the people rule?” and the answer was, “The people shall rule!” Andrew Jackson was so notable that people have come 500 miles to see him and think that the country is rescued from some dreadful danger. It is said Jackson’s victory accelerated the transfer of national power from the country-house to the farmhouse, from the East to the West, and from the snobs to the mobs. If Jackson was a hero of the gentleman farmer, he was surely a hero of the dirt farmer. Jackson was democratic because he granted all men equal rights, and believed that the common man is just as good as the wealthy. This is how he got all his support, most of which came from the common man. We must also consider that he was a common man who became successful as president. He disagreed with the wealthy, who tried to empower the common man/farmers, and was a large supporter of wester farmers, low tariffs, and pet banks, rather than a national bank. (Document 2).

Jackson’s version of democracy was in fact a democracy. He was not a very wealthy man, he owned a home and some land. Which was more than could be said about most Americans at the time. About ten percent of the Americans living there at that time owned enough land to vote. There was a law, stating that only white males with a good portion of land could vote in the presidential election. Andrew Jackson thought this system was so unfair, he created a new way to govern the citizens of the newly formed United States.

The Jacksonian Democrats were very important in the revolutions in political democracy that took place during this period. During this period universal white male suffrage took place and was the first step towards the revolution of the common man in politics. Also, Jackson's acceptance and support of the two-party system helped create a more democratic America in which people with similar views could unite in their support of a singular candidate. Many "working men" of this time period had felt they had been taken advantage of and misrepresented by tyrannical aristocrats who treated them poorly (A). Jackson used this to his advantage with emotionalized speeches exploiting class differences. However, it should be said that during this time period the amount of voters increased dramatically which means that more Americans were involved in American politics (D). Jackson's use of the "Kitchen Cabinet" kept his knowledge of critics and the wants and needs of the people up

The dominant controversy included the conflict between the free black men wanting the right to vote and racist politicians; another was Jackson being against the Second B.U.S. Jacksonian Democracy was a turning point for America that provided a script for acts in the future. Jackson, from the very beginning of his presidency, strived to change the political system of the U.S. He began by

Jacksonian Democracy was the truly the “Common Man” democracy, seeing to how the government was helping the rich get richer and drain the middle and poor classes of all of their money,a New America’s perfect President. However, Andrew Jackson’s abuse of power during his term, before and after have gave him the name of King Andrew the First; He completely ignored laws the he did not like and the two branches of government; He even went as far as making sure slavery was a continuous thing during that time. Therefore, the Jacksonian Democrats’ view of themselves is quite inaccurate.

During the 1820’s and the 1830’s, Jacksonian Democrats became more influential in the United States. These Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the protectors of the common man and as a result rose to prominence during this time period. Although, the Jacksonian Democrats can be considered to be the guardians of the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity to a limited extent, they are considered to be the guardians of their own interests to a much greater extent. More often than not, the Jacksonian Democrats used their claims as guardians of the common man to justify their actions on controversial topics.

The Age of Jackson was a period in American history filled with contradictions, especially regarding democracy. Although there was a vast period that saw an exponential increase in voter participation, nominating committees replaced caucuses, and electors began to be popularly elected. These changes were only observed in a small portion of the American society; White, Anglo-Saxon males. Meaning that despite White, Anglo-Saxon males gaining a significant amount of liberty and equality other minorities such as Indians, women, and immigrants received no such thing. Additionally as result of such high demands for cotton there was a rise in slave populations who lacked equality. Moreover, there was an imbalance of wealth throughout the American society. These contradictions represent America thought however, Jacksonian democrats viewed themselves as guardians of the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of opportunity. Therefore the question arises how was it that Jacksonian democrats viewed themselves as successful guardians of the nation yet such

U.S. president Andrew Jackson and his followers of the Democratic party created the political doctrine referred as Jacksonian Democracy, which is an expansion of Thomas Jefferson’s previous established democratic principles. Encouraging the strength of the executive branch, Jacksonian Democracy was set at the expense of the Congressional power. Democrats encouraged the idea of the common man and believed in the giving power to all white men rather than the prosperous nobles. Jackson and his followers believed in rotating many common men through office to allow active participation in government. Jackson’s presidency highlighted individualism disregarding persons’ background or education level. Jacksonian democrats viewed themselves as promoters

During the 1820 to 1830 white male suffrage took place and it was the first step towards the rise of the common people in politics. To increase this the rise Jackson supported two-party system which helped create a more democratic America and people with different/similar views could support and work together for one purpose. This also helped bring people together, which got them more involved in politics. Working men at first didn’t join because they were poorly treated by the aristocrats who controlled majority of the government, and the people felt as if there was no space for them to try in politics unless they were friends with a person in power. Jackson got people to pay more attention in politics due to his past of being a commoner who rose the ranks and also because of the many emotional speeches that he gave which impacted, and persuaded many Americans to pay attention to the government.

because Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson were very different people, and they both created the main beliefs in their own democracies. Although they are both thought of as very similar, their core beliefs were very different. These differing core beliefs, just to name a few, were their feeling on the powers of strong federal government, their stances on slavery, and their feelings on industrialism.

As democracy means the people of all kind run the government but Andrew Jackson only allowed white men to vote and

Jeffersonian and Jacksonian Democracies were the same in pretty much every aspect. Their perspectives and objectives as presidents were almost identical. Both were agreeable to the idea of the “common man should rule”, and they both felt that it is the ordinary citizens who ought to have the greatest impact on government, not the aristocrats or the wealthy people. They additionally reinforced states’ rights and felt that the government should not interfere with the states’ issues. However, the two presidents’ activities plainly demonstrated that the regular man does exclude minorities. Both Jackson's and Jefferson's activities and words are fundamentally the same as they both illustrated the similarities in their beliefs. Jackson used most

Foremost, Jackson demonstrated the era of the “common man” through the broadening of the term Democracy in America. Before Jackson the non-elites who did not own much land had finally

American politics was actually more restrictive, and more effectively controlled by national parties under the control of the Jacksonian Democracy. Jacksonian Democracy was first limited with its attitude to veto towards the national bank system. During Jackson`s administration, he manifested his democratic ideas by attacking the Second National Bank of the United States as a privileged monopoly and increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. He stated in the documentation that “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.