Jeremy Bloom Against The Ncaa

With college basketball and football originating in the 1800’s, the game has had much time to adapt. Over the years, the sports have become more and more popular, gaining a bigger fan base, which has resulted in substantial profits from the sale of merchandise representing the teams and players. There is one thing that has not changed; all of the athletes are still not being paid. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, is an organization that regulates most aspects of

In his article “The Shame of College Sports,” Taylor Branch (2011) describes how universities are focused on advancing and receiving money from major athletics and having star athletes, but how the universities are not caring for the “student athlete.” The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has made college sports into an unmerited business. However, as years progress more athletes are getting smart and are taking the NCAA to court. The more students that challenges the rules by the NCAA and take them to court, the secrets and undermining values of the NCAA come out and the closer the NCAA comes to an end.

Nevertheless, the revenue made by the NCAA from ticket sales, marketing and television deals is not used for education or research. According to Mark Schlabach, ESPN Senior Writer, 20 % of the money goes back to the involved schools but it does not go directly to the classrooms of the university. The profits are shared between the coaches, administrators and the rest of the staff as well as money to the athletic program to maintain it. According to NCAA.org “$199.6 million was Distributed to Division I schools to help fund NCAA sports and provide scholarships for college athletes” out of 996 million raised. In some cases money is taken from the school department to fund the athletic programs, for example the University of Tennessee took $18

Every year, thousands of student athletes across the world sign the NCAA’s 08-3A Form, also called the “Student-Athlete” form, which waives their right to receive money for the use of their name and image. Like many of us in this class, these college athletes devote their time to their academics while spending additional hours with training and practices throughout the day and receive no stipend in return. This 08-3A form defines college athletes as amateurs, who cannot receive payment for playing their desired sport. While their schools and coaches may make millions of dollars in salaries and endorsement deals and are the highest-paid public employees in many states due to their performances in their desired sport, these “amateurs” can never

For example Josh Huff a former wide receiver at the university of Oregon, states, “it’s ok for the NCAA to make money off my name and likeness, but once I go charge people to get in my party it’s a problem.” COLLEGIATE ATHLETES: THE CONFLICT BETWEEN NCAA AMATEURISM AND A STUDENT ATHLETE'S RIGHT OF PUBLICITY is an article that explains the unfairness in this situation. Because of his displeasure with the non-compensated and amateurism rule, josh began to shed light on the truth of that student athlete’s right are being violated. The NCAA alone makes millions of revenue of the hard work of these student athletes, names and participation in collegiate athletics. While the only thing justifies the decision, keeping them from being paid is that they already are receiving free education as well as college stipend. Looking at the meaning of amateurism and its purpose this article is to back up student athletes and recognize that their work and role in the NCAA is a little deeper than amateur status. Universities are making money of these students hard work and while the names on the team roster are what generate the demand, the ones in the backgrounds get compensated very handsomely. As stated in this article “The NCAA’s purpose is to maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body and, by so doing, retain a clear line of demarcation between intercollegiate athletics and professional sports.” But this clear line is already crossed when universities allow their students to become personal sales pitches and promotional puppets. See a lot of schools athletic revenue thrives of the backs of these students, literally using the names of these students and their success to uplift their school

Donald Delahaye, a kicker for UCF you may have heard of him. Lost his NCAA eligibility for making and profiting of his YouTube videos. Another name you may know LiAngelo Ball. Couldn’t profit or promote his family made business of Big Baller Brand (BBB) because of NCAA eligibility rules. His little brother LaMelo Ball could lose his NCAA eligibility for making and profiting off his own signature shoe. These athletes all have something in common. All these athletes, these people have either had their eligibility taken or in jeopardy because they were profiting off their image, content, or likeness. College coaches, programs, and schools make millions off their student athletes and the NCAA billions off the student athletes. As more people

In the article titled, Why College Athletes Should Be Paid , Tyson Hartnett discusses how the NCAA signed a 14 year deal with CBS for 10.8 billion dollars. As a result, the NCAA has

Abstract:  Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.

Billions and billions of dollars going... where? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes almost 11 billion dollars a year from college athletics but where does that money go? Well, the money for sure does not end up in the hands of these collegiate student-athletes, those men, and women who make them all that money in the first place. These billionaires want all the money for themselves. They are selfish. They are self-centered. They are money-hungry. They are part of the problem with college athletics. They are scared to lose just a small portion of this exorbitant pile of riches that they make to pay these hard working, devoted athletes. How could this problem be solved? You should be 100 percent sure of what you would do in this situation. They are putting themselves on the line just to make the NCAA money and not get any in return. Just take a minute and process what these athletes are doing and how they are not getting repaid by these networks mostly NCAA.

But something doesn't add up here. None of this money is possible without the athletes playing. So why do the overpaid coaches, the overpaid administrators, and the overpaid people that work for the NCAA get the money instead of the athletes playing in the game? So much money is being passed around and nothing goes to the

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decides that the NCAA’s payment rules do not allow college athletes to obtain the money they deserve. The court also ruled that the antitrust law states that the NCAA allows the school to only pay for the athlete’s tuition. A New Orleans business reporter did an article over a basketball player, named Ed O’Bannon, who believed that he was being robbed of money that he rightfully deserved. In 2009, O’Bannon, who played basketball for the University in California at Los Angeles, sued the National Collegiate American Association for using his name and image on television and in video games. A group of other students joined O’Bannon in trying to fight the NCAA. They challenged that the amateurism rules were not fair to athletes because other people were profiting off of their name and actions. The NCAA then stated that the players signed a waiver stating the NCAA would be allowed to use the player’s name and image. O’Bannon’s legal team then argued that the players are forced to sign that waiver in order to play college sports (“Federal Appeals”).

As a nonprofit the NCAA is often not compared to large companies even it makes comparable revenue. All television and video game revenue, as well as ticket, jersey, and souvenir sales made from college athletics all go to the NCAA, the conferences, the athletic departments, and the coaches. In fact, one study suggests, “Men’s basketball and football combine for $6 billion alone” (Mondello, Piquero, Piquero, Gertz & Bratton, 2013). None of that revenue goes directly to the student athlete even though the NCAA surely has enough money to do so if it chooses. USA Today writer Bruce Horovitz states in his article, March Madness Evokes Marketer Madness that, “The NCAA men’s basketball tournament generated $1.15 billion in television ads in 2013, well beyond the revenue generated by the NFL and NBA playoffs, according to ESPN” (Horovitz, 2014). Marc Edelman, a professor at City University of New York takes it a bit farther in his article The Case for Paying College Athletes, and claims, “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million” (Edelman, 2014). In contrast, during the 2014-2015 season the NBA grossed about $5.18 billion in revenues according to Forbes Magazine, which was a league record high. The NCAA revenue money is also not evenly distributed among the schools, as top tiered athletic programs tend to make more money

O’Bannon argued that he and other past NCAA players deserve money due to the NCAA playing past games which they had played in and generated money through it. O’Bannon suggested that a form of royalty was necessary as it technically fulfilled the requirements. Also O’Bannon argued that, because of the NCAA using their “avatars” in their games they should be given compensation, but the NCAA argued that they were not the same person, even though they were visually identical. Due to the NCAA making money off of their past performances in the games it was argued that they should be paying money to the previous athletes for compensation. While current student athletes are obviously reimbursed with a multitude of benefits former athletes are given no revenue the moment they leave. O’Bannon thought this to be unfair which led him to accuse the NCAA. This case is a good example of legal formation as each perspective was challenged on the basis of the laws themselves. However this specific case was dropped, it has inspired new conflicts like “Should College/University athletes be paid

Imagine sitting down in the comforts of your home, relaxing on the couch, and eating your favorite junk food while playing your favorite video game. What if you 're actually playing as yourself on the newest NCAA football or basketball game. Wouldn 't that be awesome? Believe it or not it didn 't seem that awesome when Ed O 'Bannon, a former UCLA power forward, had a realization. O 'Bannon wondered why he wasn 't getting any compensation for being on the video game who had duplicated his image onto the game. As time went on and more athletes, past and present, were added as plaintiffs the case started to evolve. Not only did the case involve the NCAA video games, but the NCAA brand as a whole. Colleges make a fortune off athletes who in turn play in hopes of a professional career; however, even though athletes who play in college are granted a scholarship many struggle to pay for things such as laundry or food. Although the court ruled that NCAA violated it 's anti-trust laws in making the video games, the court still ruled in favor of amateurism in sports after the appeal of granting $5,000 payments to athletes. So the question still remains, should college athletes be paid to play? I propose that college athletes get a percentage of the profit directly from the Colleges based upon how much the specific sport profits within the Association.

The NCAA’s greatest fear about paying student athletes is the money itself. They worry it will be spread thin between all the sports departments, but with all the money circulating around the college sports industry, they should not have any concerns. The two most popular college sports, football and men’s basketball, generate over $6 billion in annual revenue combined; more than the amount the National