Introduction Jill Jones is a smart, loyal, and accomplished 45-year old woman faced with an ethical dilemma at work. She has spent the last 27 years working for a mid-sized, family-owned business, Candy Corporation, and has worked her way up to the position of Vice President of Sales. The company’s owner and CEO, William Potter, has announced that he is considering his oldest son, Henry, to take over the position of CEO. The change will move William to finally achieve the role of Chairman of the Board. Currently, Henry is a very successful branch manager for the company’s Miami office. However, the proposed change would make Henry her new boss. Jones has mixed emotions over the appointment of Henry to the CEO position since a number of years ago Henry sexually propositioned her and made her life miserable at the time. She had not disclosed the incident to anyone (Assignment #1 Making an Ethical Decision Scenario, 2015). The Ethical Dilemma To make the situation worse for Jones, William has disclosed to her that he cannot be objective about Henry and wants her to provide him with a critical evaluation and recommendations regarding the potential …show more content…
If she chose the Deontology approach, involving William in the past would cause more harm than good (Santa Clara University, n.d.). If she chose the Egoism approach, bringing up the past with Henry could prove to be confrontational and uncomfortable for both of them. It would appear that Jones can’t move forward and put the past behind her (Sadler, 2011). Jones should allow Henry to prove he has learned from his past and now makes better decisions that he did in the past. The fact that he is a successful branch manager for the Miami office is a good sign that he has matured and grown professionally (Assignment #1 Making an Ethical Decision Scenario,
The ethical and legal dilemmas that Ms. Burrows admitted to in the stipulation and final agency order were: billing insurance after taking payment for services, inadequate documentation and record keeping, and failure to have a signed mandatory disclosure (Stipulation Case No. 2013-938). When making reports to third parties such as insurance providers, counselors are required to be truthful and forthcoming (American Counseling Association, 2014). Taking cash payments and then billing an insurance company is not only untruthful, it is intentional fraud. Another fraudulent action committed by Ms. Burrows was billing under the depression codes but not having treatment plan connected to depression. Miscoding for the purposes of billing is insurance fraud (Lane, 2014).
Other ethical issues surrounding Henry exist as well. Conflicts of interest present as both Henry’s daughters are engineers and are working on opposing teams for the competition. One daughter is on GUIDEME’s team while the other is on Outocar. Henry knows the competition is rigged and that one of his daughters will get shortchanged.
Luke, an employee of ABC Company has an ethical issue that makes him go and look for advise at the Ethics Department of ABC Company. The department of Ethics Department is dedicated to advise employee and prevent any risks of losing their jobs because of unaware immoral decisions. Now that the company has decided to build an adult entertainment retail store, Luke has come across a big decision. The Department of Ethics needs to help Luke decide to whether, obey his commencement with ABC Company and keep confidentiality until they make it public, or to warn his brother, Owen (who lives in the neighborhood that would be affected) that his house would substantially depreciate and he may lose money if he does not sell the house now
According to this framework ethical/unethical decisions are controlled/moderated by three independent variables, which are individual factors, significant others in an organizational setting, and opportunity for action. According to Ferrell & Gresham the three variables can be further categorized into individual and organizational contingencies. Individual factors like attitudes, knowledge, values, and intentions are assumed to be interacting with organizational factors, such as significant others and opportunity factors to influence an individual involved in an ethical/unethical dilemma. In the following paragraphs we will analyze how these individual as well as organizational factors interplayed in Courtland Kelley’s situation at GM.
In 1998, Betty Vinson was promoted to a senior manager in the firm’s corporate accounting division. Two years later in her position she experienced a major ethical dilemma. The company WorldCom was a very successful company up until the middle of 2000 when the telecommunication industry entered a protracted slump. The company’s earnings were not Wall Street expectations, and it was saddled with unpaid bills. Vinson’s job was to repair the problem by doing some wrong accounting practices. The ethical dilemma is weather she should or shouldn’t do and the consequences if she does or doesn’t do. What ethical decision should Betty Vinson take?
Candy has a few slip-ups of her own, but she is for the most part maintaining sound ethical philosophy. The ethical issues in this case can relate to a number of ethical philosophies we discussed in class. Candy utilizes ethical judgment processes to guide her decision making. According to Managing Business Ethics, there are three branches of what’s needed to make a proper decision: ethical awareness, ethical judgment, and ethical action.
Ethics is the guiding force in any respectable organization. With a moral compass, especially in the leadership of organization, a company can become compromised and fall into a quagmire of legal issues, a tarnished reputation, and devaluation of company stock if it is a publically traded company. In pursuit of examine my own ethical lens I will analyze the ethical traits of an admired leader, my own traits as exhibited in the Ethical Lens Inventory, and how I make a decision concerning a particular ethical dilemma.
Mrs. Jones being nice to Roger made him change in many ways. It made him learn to trust people, including Mrs. Jones. She is REALLY nice to Roger, considering that he tried to mug her. If that was me I’d be stomped and turned in to the police. Roger is just lucky that he ran into a nice woman like her. Roger learned trust because when she took him back home, she turned with her back facing him and then they trusted each other. Then, she made dinner and made sure that he ate, that’s the niceness of her. She didn’t have to do any of that. She could’ve turned to the police. That’s why she is nice and that’s why Roger learned respect, trust, and honesty.
Everyday individuals are faced with issues associated with ethical dilemmas. Ethical dilemmas involve an individual’s behavior toward a moral standard, which may have been established from previous generations and passed along. In upholding the standards taught individual may be forced to take a particular action involving a decision when a behavior is considered non-ethical is when an ethical dilemma occurs. It can become difficult at times in making the correct decisions or solutions to the situation, which is why a code of ethics is established in the workplace. The code of ethics in the
It begins with the group of girls gossiping at work about their superior. One of them states how she heard the principle investigator became romantically involved with a student of his. This is not ethically acceptable for multiple reasons. One reason being this could be considered defamation of character. The other reason being if the statement is true, a sexual relationship with a student could be consider unethical from a variety of views. However, the dilemma with a choice afterward was this superior threatening an employee’s job if they do not like the possibility of an outcome. In this case the participant did not show up for their appointment. I chose the assistant should “suck it up and tell Dr. Haddard she was a no show.” After she informs him he does not say much then answers his cell phone. Part of responsible data management includes honesty about any missed appointments or dropouts. This is the best way to maintain the legitimacy of the research study’s
What should Cynthia do? What ideals, obligations, and effects should she take into account when asking her decision?
In today's business and personal world, ethical decisions are made on a daily basis. Most of these decisions are based on company ground rules. The others are based on personal ground rules. All decisions can have a number of ground rules that help us determine whether our decision is ethical or unethical. Each decision whether it is based on company or personal ground rules will have its own set of implications. In the following paragraphs I will discuss the impacts of ethics on decision-making, discuss the elements of an ethically defensible decision, define what the ground rules are; what they could be and what they should be, discuss
However, we will not end our analysis here; we will also evaluate this case by applying ethical considerations. Joe is in the clear from any ethical violations in this case. Mary, however, is another story altogether. She is fully aware of Joe’s concerns in regards to the performance of the computer system and she has chosen to ignore those concerns. In her response to Joe, she has questioned whether Joe can handle his responsibilities as District Manager, a direct threat to his employment with the company.
Ethics is more than legality and although there doesn’t appear to be any broken laws, or any broken yet, ethical standards in business are fundamental. Ethics goes beyond obeying laws to include abiding by moral standards accepted by society. Without good moral behavior, many more negative situations would develop like corruption, insider trading, extortion, embezzlement, and for students, plagiarism. Frank is put in a difficult situation because he conscientiously knows that the wrong decision wouldn’t only affect Michele, but will also affect him and his team. Not carrying out his supervisor’s request can eventually get him fired. Doing what he wants, will have unfavorable future outcomes for his team. Sometimes there is no easy alternative in such ethical dilemmas because you must choose between equally
Companies must rely on a solid foundation of ethics if they are to succeed and keep quality employees. Employees today are being ethically challenged every day. The pressure of business life clearly tests the personal morality of all individuals at all levels of the organization. As an employee, we should not automatically assume a questionable request is unethical. There is many types of ethical dilemmas in the workforce but relationships in the workplace may have the most effect on the company. There are a few types of relationships in the workplace; these types of relationships include romantic partnerships, family connections, and friendship, this can be a long-term friendship or one formed within the workplace. There are many different types of disadvantages for each, and each one weighs differently on the workplace.