Jill 's Warrant For Arrest

The YMR shared that her mother was in jail for about 2 months, and YMR and her 7 month-old baby sister are with foster parents. YMR explained that her mother got out of jail a week ago, but the YMR has not seen her. YMR tried to talk to her mother, but she did not answer the phone, last Tuesday the client was able to talk to her mother and she told YMR that she (mother) was going to ask the judge to have only the custody of her baby sister and not YMR. YMR's mom explained her that is because YMR told the social worker that she has seen some missed phone calls in her mother's cell phone and the number seemed to be from her country), there was also a message with the words that the mother's partner usually uses. The YMR shared that her mother told her that she should not have told that to the social worker. The YMR also shared that she has had headaches for the last three days. YMR stated that she feels guilty. YMR stated that she cut her left arm on Tuesday, the cuts are small and form the word in Spanish "te odio" (translation: I hate you) and the capital "M", the client could not explain if that feeling of hate is to herself or somebody

I have a loved one, who was forced to go to rehab to help lessen her punishment for a charge she received for fighting in school. As a fifteen year old, rehab isn’t the top on the to-do list. So they do whatever they can to get out the fastest they can. Once they’re out, all is good for about a month, and that’s usually when the old habits start to kick back in. The old friends start to come around, bringing the same drugs around as well, not to feel peer pressured, but let’s be real for a second, no fifteen year old is going to pass up a good time with a long lost friend. So, the downward spiral begins again. But this time, probation is a key factor, because the rehab gig was court ordered. So now when she fails her next drug test, they give her a warning and add an extra month onto probation. And the next? Not quite, she’s arrested and put in the back of a squad car and sent to York County Detention Center for Juveniles. For thirty whole days and then back to rehab for thirty more. When we got family visitations, of course she is so emotional, ready to change and come home to make everything right. But can we really believe her this time? She’s lied, stolen and manipulated all of her loved ones so many times, it’s of course hard to trust her word. Luckily for us, lockup and rehab helped her. She realized she let the ones who love her the most down, but we never left her side and she’s more appreciative than ever. She’s now

Your client Sue is a Social Work Assistant. In your last session she disclosed that she is concerned that on a recent home visit, herself and a senior colleague did not follow the necessary policies and procedures. They had visited a family with a history of neglect and domestic violence and did not ask to see the child or enter the home, both these actions are prescribed as appropriate as part of their work.

The client’s name is Keisha, she is a female, single, sixteen years old, African American, high school student. She was transferred recently to a nontraditional high school, to complete the required credits needed to receive her high school diploma. According to her transcripts she is passing her classes satisfactorily. Keisha is scheduled to graduate on time by the summer of 2018. The client was referred to mental health counseling by her grandmother because she appears to be depressed. The grandmother stated that “student lost her mother when she was seven years old, and thinks she is sad about that” .The school psychiatric social worker referred the client to me in order to conduct a mental health assessment. Per her

The department’s intervention plan was to remove the child from the home and place her in a safer environment. My client’s response to this intervention at first was very angry and resentful towards the department. Father especially angry with the department and did not understand why he couldn’t keep his daughter since mother had the drug issue. I realized how difficult it would be to build rapport with them after removing their child. I ensured them that I was there to help; I was very empathic and showed them that I cared about their case. I worked with the parents and helped them to

Crystal was a 43-year-old waitress from three forks. Her husband is a convenience store manager and she currently has her own 2 teenage children living with her as well as a nephew, all of who depend on her and her husband. Thus far she had been in custody for 6 weeks. Crystal had been a lifetime user, when asked what her drug of choice was she gave the response “anything and everything”. Crystal admitted to using meth, coke, weed, pain pills, and heroin intravenously. Her first drug offense happened while living in Missoula at the age of 28 where she started prison almost twelve years ago. Following that sentence Crystal had been sober for six years, until she had to have a hip surgery that led her back down the path of drug abuse. She has many prior offenses and recently served 4 years in prison of a ten year suspended sentence. Had crystal not agreed to drug court there was a possibility that the 10 year sentence by Lewis and Clark county would have been reinstated and she would have gone back to prison for the 6 remaining years of that sentence. After treatment court and her current situation and options had been explained to her Crystal signed a contract and was therefore accepted into the treatment court program. It was explained to her that she must comply with all the requirements of drug court, and she was provided with a backpack containing an alarm clock, day planner, meeting schedule, bus route and schedule, as well as the blue book. The backpack is courtesy of the friends of treatment court, a local group of citizens who want to see participants succeed and return to a normal life. Crystal’s goals after the completion of Treatment court are to finish her degree, and become a productive member of

Counselor red flagged pt. and requested that he meet for brief TX intervention to discuss his current counseling non-compliance status and explaining the risk of discharge from the program if he fails to do an individual session by 1/22/17. AMS receptionist told this writer that pt. is asking why he needs to meet with this writer. This writer told him to inform him that if he fails to complete one hour individual session by 1/22/17 he will be subject for a TX discharge. Pt. refused to meet with this writer and he failed to schedule an individual session on the above date.

CPSW did a home visit to meet with Ms. Berner and to discuss about her safety plan since the children are moving with her on10/29/16 from the foster provider. Ms. Berner was late for her appointment and CPSW waited a 40 minutes for Ms. Berner. Ms. Berner apologized for being late. CPSW explained Ms. About safety plan. Ms. Berner understood and she signed them. Ms. Berner stated that she will be doing a house arrest for two weeks and the recommendation of her criminal court is to obey law and continue taking her medication on time and seeing her therapist. Also, cooperating with her PO and CPSW. CPSW consulted with the supervisor and she has approved both children to move back with Ms. Berner. Goal 1-2

He reports the patient’s roommate was subsequently evicted from his home after the landlord inquired about the ambulance visiting. He reports he contacted her father concerning the patient residing within the family home, but the father has said no. In addition, he reports he has attempted to contact her uncle but has been unable to make contact with him. He reports he has attempted to make contact with her said friend who is considering allowing her the opportunity to reside with her but she has not answered her phone and he has been unable to leave a voice message. He reports no one wants her in their home, and the patient has “burned her bridges” with family members. He reports her family would benefit from counseling. In addition, he reports her family has high expectations of CPS. He reports her current case was not going to close within 12 days of 06/30/2017. In addition, the case will not

This officer has had contact via face to face and phone with the mother, Ms. Evelyn Edwards. Discussions have taken place with her regarding Marquel’s Comprehensive Re-Entry Case Plan. She has participated in a video conference with Marquel since his commitment. She is aware of his placement in the Virginia Beach CPP Program. She has not visited him at the facility, but she has had contact with him via phone. She is currently unemployed. Upon Marquel’s release from DJJ, the anticipated parole plan (CRCP) will be for him to return to her home with intensive supportive services via 294 funding. Additionally, in the event this placement is no longer available, an alternative placement will be sought via 294 funding for a group home placement or

The client met with his counselor for his 1x1 session to completed his Exit plan. The client has completed and turned in his second step and has went over it with his counselor. the client seems to be interested staying clean and sober and appears to be seeking understand as to how to stay sober. The client has learned to let go of some of his resentment but needs to work in letting the resentment he has against himself. The client reported that he follow through with the King of Kings sober living stipulation as to having to attend three meeting a week there at there program to prove that he wants to go into their sober living program once an open becomes available. the client reported as well that he will be spending more time with his

As a counselor works with clients, one may have to work with a client that are taking psychotropic medication. A client named Kimberly disclosed in a session that she has Bipolar Disorder. She is a 19 year old African American woman. Kimberly has been experiencing symptoms of Bipolar Disorder for three years. Before beginning to take lithium, Kimberly has run away from home, displays erratic behaviors, has using marijuana to relieve symptoms, and attempting suicide when experiencing severe depression. Kimberly has also attempted suicide. Kimberly’s mental illness has affected her relationship with her mother and put a financial strain on the household. Kimberly was arrested and charged with the possession of marijuana.

Mr. Smith’s phone records are protected under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This Court has held that, the text of the Fourth Amendment does not explicitly state when a search warrant must be obtained. Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 2173 (2016). It has been conceded though, that a warrant must typically be secured prior to conducting a search. Id. The Nodlin Police must have been aware of this requirement as they took the proper steps in acquiring a search warrant to access the data contained in the Memory Hole app. The police waited until after the search warrant expired before contacting AO for their records. R-4. The fact that AO complied with the expired warrant does not permit the police from obtaining these records without a warrant.

The client is a 14-year-old Hispanic female in a residential substance abuse treatment rehabilitation center. The client participated in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy anger management group. The client was admitted to the residential program in July of 2016 for her cannabis use. She was referred by Drug Court due to her failure to comply with the program rules. The client has a past of domestic violence and defiant behavior towards her mother and not abiding by curfew.

Due to the laws in the Bill of Rights, no officer has the right to arrest any individual unless they have probable cause. Two ways an officer can make an arrest include, arrests with a warrant and arrests without a warrant (Peak, 2015). A warrant arrest occurs when an officer can justify that he or she has enough probable cause to a neutral magistrate, who will then decide if enough evidence is present to warrant an arrest. (Peak, 2015). Once a warrant is obtained, an officer has the right to take the suspect into custody to answer the charges. While a warrant arrest is preferred, street cops often do not have time to get a warrant. If time does not permit a warrant, an officer has the right to conduct a warrantless arrest (Peak, 2015).