preview

Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond

Decent Essays
Open Document

While sources normally would be considered credible, should the source be considered credible whenever the source has been acting and literally living as a different person for a role in a movie? Much less a movie about an unusual, not very mentally stable person. At that point, are they speaking for themselves, or the person they are portraying? How “crazy” does method acting make people, if “crazy” at all? In the documentary, Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond, it illustrates the possible damaging effects of method acting and people not being reliable or even themselves. Even when starting the movie, not even Jim Carrey knows where to begin. In a documentary that revolves around the mental state of Jim Carrey portraying a role revolving around …show more content…

As if he was literally Andy Kaufman, and in Jim’s mind, he was. Jim described it as Andy saying, “Sit down I’ll be doing my movie”. Jim was becoming Andy. He even went as far as to say, “What happened next was out of my control”. Perhaps this is him being dedicated to the idea of method acting, but then again, has him portraying Andy affected his mental state? Is he fit to answer certain questions regarding the movie and the time of filming? This question is especially pertinent because current Jim is the only real source in the documentary. During that time, Jim referred to himself as “not on Earth.” Does that make him reliable? Does that come from his perspective. It is debatable who is talking and whose thoughts are coming …show more content…

People like Danny Devito questioned Carrey and the legitimacy of his state of mind at the time. At first Danny said, “It’s really great. He’s exactly the way Andy was. Exactly” but as time goes on, Devito begins to become less appreciative and more concerned. For that reason, which source would people trust more? Someone who believes that someone is out of their mind or someone perhaps overly dedicated to their job. Jim knew he was not dealing with just some other comedian when he accepted the role of Andy. Andy was definitely his own type of person. One man even said, “how do you describe Andy [Kaufman] to a person who has never seen him?” Just acting like Andy for a movie method acting or not - regardless could be damaging. He certainly was not the stereotypical comedian. He was not so much concerned about making the audience laugh, but rather leaving them confused. His logic, or lack of, was getting attention any way he could, and he certainly got people’s

Get Access