preview

Jim Casy In The Grapes Of Wrath

Decent Essays
Open Document

Characterization, a primary tool used by Steinbeck in The Grapes of Wrath; which is renowned for its memorable characters and their evolution thought the novel, a primary example of this is the story line of Jim Casy, a former preacher who has formulated a unique philosophy on life and its antics. To fully understand the evolution of Jim Casy’s philosophy one must trace his life and the stages of progression he takes as a character to cope with the altering state of the world and his position. This analyzation can be started by observing his earlier life as a corrupt preacher, followed by the base of a new philosophy which has been formulated by the time Tom Joad meets him again, and lastly by analyzing the dramatic shift in the activism of …show more content…

Most notably, the difference of the frequency of acting for all humans in the roles they play. Overall the message stays the same that all humans are connected and contribute to one massive soul and spirit, and the acts they do have an effect on the spirit for everyone. Early in the novel Casy has few dramatic acts due to the fact he believes that the way to deal with this soul is to let it happen around him with no interference; but, in the end of the novel he realizes that he must act and participate. Changing his philosophy into its final form, that everyone shares a soul and everyone must constantly act out to benefit it and ultimately everyone else. An example of Casy following this is when he volunteers to go to prison in order to protect the Joads, he exclaims, "Somebody got to take the blame. I got no kids. They'll jus' put me in jail, an' I ain't doin' nothin' but set aroun'." (Steinbeck 363). Therefore, the meaning of life according Casy is fulfilled allowing his untimely demise to become less heart breaking, because the reader knows he accomplished what he would have wanted before death. With the ending chapters the reader also gets some added features to the philosophy as being the definitions of what is good and evil; good is doing an action to help the human spirit unlike evil in which you do a malicious act harming the overall spirit. Elaborated on when Casy states, “There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do. It's all part of the same thing. And some of the things folks do is nice, and some ain't nice, but that's as far as any man got a right to say.” (Steinbeck 32) Therefore, one can be a good person by doing good which helps everyone overall, as done by the majority of the main cast within the novel, which ultimately results in things starting to be relived as the novel

Get Access