Job Enlargement, Rotation And Enrichment

More modernized theories have been developed to explain motivation in the workplace. These theories are quite useful and strongly support Galt’s decision to pursue a flat rate system and are used to support our recommendation to Galt.

* Increased Stress - As employees are stretched to meet job requirements, their stress levels rise and they become incapable of maximizing their performance.

* Employees might decrease rate of production as demand decreases to create an impression of need and to preserve jobs

First, skills variety concerns about the capacity a person needs to complete a task; then, task identity defines the energy and enthusiasm a person needs to complete a job; task significance refers to the part of the job from where a worker learns new things; autonomy attribute deals with an individual’s independence; feedback refers to the part of the job where employees see their performance. In fact, there is a part of a given job that stimulates an employee’s mental condition, later mental condition influence a worker’s goals and objectives. There are three mental conditions that affect a person’s performance; primarily, knowledge of the given job and the importance of it, then, information on job results; third the gaining information, which refers to what the employee learns from the job. As a result, an employee increases interest in the job; he/she grows his/her self-esteem and productivity. In the same way, male and female differ on work motivation and job satisfaction. Managers and other professionals develop deep insights into the complexity of the individuals’ motivation and satisfaction of their work (Sultan,

Daniel Pink in his book titled Drive talks about the reasons to motivations and how people work to better themselves. There are different reasons to what keeps people motivated. For some it is mastery, to get better at what they do, while for others it may be the reward they are seeking at the end. Both in which have different mindsets mastery is when someone wants to get better at something for there own satisfaction, while for others it is to get satisfaction through their paycheck and profit. Motivation in work forces is money and profit. As long as people are getting what they want productivity continues, however once they stop receiving their rewards productivity decreases. This makes total sense people because as humans, people seek rewards

- So think title changes, promotions and raises as ways to compensate them for the increased workload.

By using job enrichment, I would be able to increase job satisfaction on multiple levels and help increase all levels of the core job dimensions. An enriched job organizes tasks to allow employees to finish a complete project, increasing the employee’s freedom and independence to make decisions, which in turn increases their responsibility, and provides direct feedback so employees can correct their own performance. Enriching a job touches all aspects of the core job dimensions and can lead to increased job satisfaction, reduced turnover, and

As mentioned above some of the outcomes of using job enrichment in the HIS departments were as Layman has described, “Risks to balance: Fragmentation, quantitative overload, qualitative overload, role ambiguity, role conflict, questionable acceptance in highly centralized organization, HR concerns about pay grade, risk management concerns about licensure and credentialing.”

Any work environment can have stressful aspects that can negatively affect the employees’ performance and may lead to burnout. Oftentimes when employees are stressed or burnout their commitment at the job may begin to weaken and they may lose satisfaction. Many organizations have recognized that workers burnout is the result of aggravated chronic work stressors and embodied by enervation and inefficacy. This author will discuss the impact of stress and worker burnout on organizations. Moreover, this author will consider the implication of stress and worker burnout on the employee, as well as the short- and long-term productivity of a business.

This would not only be advantageous for the employer but also the employee since it would result in higher wages. Due to this, the worker’s level of motivation and drive to do better would escalate leading to overall productivity of the organization (Salimath and Jones, 2011, p.88).

Motivation in the workplace is one of the major concerns that managers face when trying to encourage their employees to work harder and do what is expected of them on a day-to-day basis. According to Organizational Behavior by John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn the definition of motivation is "the individual forces that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person's effort expended at work." They go on to say that "motivation is a key concern in firms across the globe." Through the years there have been several theories as to what motivates employees to do their best at work. In order to better understand these theories we will apply them to a fictitious organization that has the following

Studies from different parts of the world made by different health organizations have showed that long working hours and pressured work lead to stress which affects the employees mentally and physically and leads indirectly to low productivity levels. Not only stress, but it can cause a lot more of health issues like extreme fatigue including sleepiness, poor concentration, and increased susceptibility to illness. These symptoms can a have a noticed effect on the general productivity of an organization.

3. Loading means the assignment of jobs to work or procession centers. Operations managers assign jobs to work centers so that costs, idle time, or completion times are kept to a minimum. Loading work centers takes two forms. One is oriented to capacity; the second is related to assignment

The relationship between job satisfaction, motivation, and efficiency or productivity is very important in the business industry as well as in personal life. Long term research has found that the single greatest predictor of longevity is work satisfaction. Work is one third to one half of a persons' lifetime, and if frustrated the mental and physical effects are very costly. Job characteristics including skill variety, task identity, and task significance lead to psychological conditions in which in turn leads to increased motivation, performance and job satisfaction. It is important to investigate this area in order to determine how much of an effect does

Lapiere's (1934) study shows a weak link at best between attitudes and behaviour. This would suggest that people who are satisfied with their work are not necessarily more productive than those workers who are unsatisfied with their work. A reason for this may be an employee’s limited ability. No matter how much an employee enjoys his job and wants to work hard, he may be limited to how much he can improve his performance as his ability restricts him. If this is the case, then this employee’s performance will not