Jodi Arias Should Receive the Death Penalty

Jodi Arias was arrested in July of 2008 and charged with the first-degree murder of Travis Alexander. Prior to her arrest, detectives performed an investigation and questioned Arias. Ideally, the investigative process and questioning should be completed within the shortest time possible to avoid problems with witnesses and evidence alteration (Gerstenfeld, 2008). Once the investigation and questioning concluded, the defendant was arrested and charged. Shortly thereafter, the defendant would be reviewed for bail. In the case of Arias, bail was denied due to the heinous nature of the crime and in the interest of public safety.

loss of a loved one is not enough for a family to deal with, Bundy remained on death row

A very popular debate goes on between people on whether or not capital punishment should exist or not. “A Death in Texas” was wrote by Steve Earle, and the main subject is capital punishment. The death penalty should not be allowed, and should not even exist, because it’s murder itself, people can change, and we don’t have the right to take another human beings life.

The article, ‘Judge: Cop Killer Brandon Daniel competent can dismiss lawyers’ published in July of 2015, talks about Daniel’s case—overall punishment. This article is about a twenty-six year old man, Brandon Daniel, who murdered an Austin, Texas police officer. The police officer, Jaime Padron, received a call involving shoplifting at a Wal-Mart in the north side of town. Both, Brandon Daniel and Padron were wrestling on the floor when the officer was shot dead. In this situation, this murder is considered capital murder. When an individual is sentenced with capital murder, they are sentenced execution or in other words the death penalty. Texas is known for having the highest number of death penalties since 1976. However in this case,

Casey Anthony should have had the death penalty for murder because of what she did

Casey Anthony should have gone to jail for the murder of her daughter of two years. The

The prosecutors on the trial refused Roof’s offer to life in prison, he was found guilty of 33 counts of federal charges including murder and hate crimes. On December 16, 2016, a jury consisting of nine white and three black people determined in three hours (“Dylann Roof convicted”) that Roof was to be sentenced to death by lethal injection. Prosecutors supported this decision by saying that Roof deserved to die due to the meticulous planning of his attack, his lack of remorse for killing nine innocent people, and his intentions of provoking more violence. The savagery of Roof’s actions made those who oppose the death penalty reconsider their view, many saying that if this was not a case that called for capital punishment, what would

murder.Arias bloody palm print with a piece of her hair was on Alexander’s wall”( Holder).

Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? These are all questions evolving from the recent Miranda V Arizona court case. Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his home on March 13th, 1963 and brought to a police station. They had reason to believe he had connection to a kidnapping and rape, along with theft and armed robbery. The victim of the kidnapping could not recognize Miranda as her attacker, so the police escorted Miranda to an interrogation room. Miranda was interrogated for two hours, and during these two hours the police acquired a written confession to the crime from Miranda. Of course, Miranda went to trial for his actions, but during the trial, Miranda’s attorney argued in court that since the police admitted to not explaining Miranda’s rights to him, this was a violation of his fifth amendment rights. Even with all of this Miranda’s written confession was still used as evidence against him in court.

Travis Alexander’s mutilated body was discovered on June 9, 2008 in the shower of his home in Mesa, Arizona by his friends after not hearing from him for several days. The body had multiple knife wounds, a slit throat, and a gunshot wound to the head, which were inflicted five days prior to his discovery. The perpetrator, Jodi Arias, age 32, was charged with Travis’ murder on July 9, 2008 and put on trial in early January of the following year. Before her trial, Ms. Arias originally denied having any involvement with the crime, which she changed to claiming they were attacked by two intruders who let her live after they killed Travis. While on trial, she then stated that she had ‘killed Travis out of self-defense’ when she was attacked by him

All the jury must agree on a verdict, if this is not possible then the

Arias and Alexander met at a conference in Las Vegas in 2006. After meeting they entered into a relationship and Arias’ obsessive tendencies started to show. Alexander was a Mormon and in order to become his ideal wife Arias converted and became a member of the Mormon Church. Later Arias moved to Arizona to be closer to him. As Arias’ jealousy and obsessiveness over Alexander began to grow, their relationship of nearly two years fell apart. Arias proved how obsessive and jealous she was when she went as far as to check his email and spying through the doggie door of

Finally,Sending somebody who did something legal murder to be punished as someone who did an illegal murder thing is not rightful. I Greatly understand how horrible to be arrested for murder

For the ten years this man sat upon death row and the three years prior to which he was sentenced to his punishment, he never regretted not taking the plea he was offered. He refused because he knew he was innocent. He never killed his wife, but the evidence, most of which was circumstantial, racked against him and even his attorney was defenseless. There was no convincing the jury of his innocence, despite the fact that he would never harm his wife. The federal government just spent millions of dollars to kill this man, making it even more impossible than it already is to pay off their trillions of dollars in national debt. The family members who knew he was innocent are grieving his absence and the injustice they face. Most importantly, however, the amount of wrongfully convicted people who faced capital punishment just increased.

My claim is that Sasha should not be going to court. Sasha has always had that criminal mind and hasn't been taught different. I believe that if you start out as a criminal and there was no one to show you the right way all you'll know is theft, robbery, etc. There are times for when it’s just plain