John 17-17 Identify Them In The Truth Essay

Avoiding research bias in studies is important to the development of objective, reliable information that can be used by the public. Check all of the situations that are likely to indicate research bias:

I’ll begin with my journal articles. The first I’m going to bring up is the book. For this topic this book was not at all a good source it was a good find but it was during the wrong era but close topic! Then when I debated if this topic could have any arguments I realized that this source was once again wrong era so it didn’t matter anymore because this source was not viable. (Masuda, 2008) What this says about my topic is that there could be room to find a different topic if I s chose, and that it’s just part of the research processing you’re not always going to find what you need immediately! Next source I found was the Guideline for Infection Control in Healthcare Personnel, 1998. This source alone was extremely valuable and key. The guidelines give us insight into one of the leading companies who created sanitary rules & conditions in the Healthcare Field. Thus, it allows us to view what they thought was important and how they also took care of their own. It’s a fascinating read and I found it interesting was how small and how much jargon they used. In an emergency it’s not practical to root through the book if you get confused! Otherwise it’s about as boring of a journal from the CDC as I thought. As far as I could see there’s little room for arguments in the validity of this text. If there was this organization wouldn’t thrive so well and be held dear by the medical profession. (Infection

Three ways an individual can critically analyze sources to determine if they are scholarly and credible are authority, accuracy, and coverage. It is serious to tell the concepts you discover on a site to a specific writer, association, or corporate. A source of data is

h. Data from scientific literature – Depending on the population and behaviors being studied, it is possible to identify some of the health priorities of a population by reviewing literature. Although there may not be published data on your specific population, studies completed within similar settings may provide useful information. Identify five published studies that may be of use in your needs assessment.

Data collection methods- the researcher needs to pick how the information for this subject can be collected (observation, questionnaires, interviews) and so forth. Analysis and presentation of findings- the researcher needs to use reports and other information gathering it into one to present the hypothesis. Conclusion- what does the studies say about this topic, this is based on all the information that was gathered together to get the correct conclusion.

c. Evaluate the research sources: Finding good sources to support your study is not easy, despite the large volume of published material. As you gather the research material, evaluate each in terms of its content and bias.

Tool validity is an extremely important aspect when gathering information used in research. There are many different tools that can be used depending on what is being researched. “Trustworthiness of the data can only be as good as the instruments or tests used to collect the data” (Boswell & Cannon, 2014). Many healthcare providers use research to increase their knowledge to help make decisions for changes in policy and procedures and in ways to care for patients.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and is measurable. Some examples of quantitative data are cost, number of participants and time. This type of research is systematic and uses the more traditional scientific method of data collection and presentation. Qualitative research has data that is nonnumeric in nature and it is difficult to measure. As the root of the same suggests, it gives a quality description of the data being viewed. It can include descriptions or verbal responses. Qualitative data is subjective in the sense that the answer can be different amongst various people.

Begin examination by reviewing the author, as certain types of sources, such as scientific or medical journals, will require an author to hold credentials not necessary to other source types. A thorough vetting ensures an author stands up to scrutiny. Two key factors to evaluating content are date of material and potential biased. Medical, scientific and legal fields require up to date information with no biased whereas literature or historical sources need not always be the most current. Sourcing for literature or historical research must account for potential biased attitudes of the period. The intended audience of a source can also assist or diminish overall credibility. Sources reviewed and accepted by peer groups add authoritative weight to the source. Author, audience and content each represent a vital component to ensuring your source credibility.

Data collection can occur with surveys, interviews, observations, abstraction of data from existing records, or compilation of data from secondary sources (Rural Assistance Center, 2015). Health research can be part of program related evaluations or part of studies that lead to policy changes. This research can also affect the type of medical services available in rural areas or number of healthcare facilities available to rural populations (Rural Assistance Center,

Learning about how to obtain credible resources has been invaluable to my advancement so far. Using Metzger's criteria has helped me to detect information that is accurate, current, objective, credible and comprehensive (Swinburne Online, 2016). Metzger’s criteria have helped me to find references such as;

The definition of “legitimate” acts as the key term to define in the phrase “legitimate research source”. The term legitimate literally means “according to rule or principle,” so a legitimate research source would meet the standards

Primary and secondary sources are ways in which data can be retrieved. As Serakan (2006) stated, “Primary data refer to information obtained by the researcher on the variables of interest for the specific purpose of the study”. Various evidence suggesting to what methods of primary research can be conducted and which are most effective for the previously mentioned problem description are stated in this chapter.

2. Selection and reading of the sources to determine which ones are the most relevant and comprehensive 3. Finding opposing arguments to

Educators and scholars draw upon data from many sources and on different subjects to illuminate current issues and trends in educational institutions. These subjects may include data from demography, health, education, culture and environment as well as government institutions and national databases. Educators and scholars use various research methods to collect, analyse and critique their findings to support or refute the topic of inquiry they are undertaking. Many researchers will commonly use the published data of others in the same manor to reinforce/support or counter argue their standing in a subject area.