John Copley and Benjamin West

Benjamin West was truly a remarkable artist who required no formal art education to learn how to

As there are similarities between these two great writers there are also differences. One difference is their cultural background. In 1761, Wheatley came into America as a young slave girl stolen

Janson, H W, Penelope J. E. Davies, and H W. Janson. Janson's History of Art: The Western Tradition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.

In the New World Bradford and Morton were both important men of our history. The stories of both great men give us an insight into the way religion and influence affected Puritan life.

Brett whiteley painted in places like Fiji, Italy, England and the united states because he love the landscape and the people there. He also painted the darling harbour and the opera because he lived in sydney.

Another important element these artists have in common is their similar composition and also their points of view.

The focus of the painting is based on the two soldiers passing the shell to each other and then into to the artillery to shoot against the German army. The gesture of working together in harsh realities carries the message of unity and self-sacrifice for the war. One soldier does not have his uniform on meaning no protective gear that characterizes unselfishness in the center of a great battle. Furthermore, there is a soldier, who has an injury on his hand, yet still continuing to fight. The wound shows contribution in the face of danger and heroism marked by the bandaged arm on his return to the conflict. It sets an example of selflessness and bravery and the artist shows that in war, sacrifice can be represented by their schedule of duty.

Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner's Art through the Ages: A Global History, Fourteenth Edition, Volume II.

He was known for his work with shells, vegetables, abstract nudes, natural rock and tree formations. His portraits were frequently framed filling and sharp. His photography seemed luxurious with abstract shapes and heavy contrast. Weston was considered a Modernist photographer as well as known for "straight photography" which was the renunciation of manipulation of the photographic procedure. He wanted to capture a realistic portrayal of life rather than take a more artistic, soft-focused route. Photos like those of Pictorialism, which was popular at that

Eventhough they differ heavily at the base level they are similar. Neither artist have an underlying symbol to thier work. They just want to entertain and invoke emotions through thier work. They also don't focus on anything in particular with thier work. Art is art in the end of the day and they both show elemnts in thier work. Both of them use this to create work that is interesting to

In this world there no two people who do something the exact same way. Poussin and Rubens are no exception. In fact their almost complete opposites there are several things that make them different. The first thing that makes the two paintings and artist differ is their believe of which part of the painting is the most important , while Rubens believes that the color is more important Poussin believes that the drawing is the more important part. The next subject that makes them different is their brush work while Rubens has Energetic brushwork Poussin has fluid and calm brushwork. The next difference is that while Rubens painting has a story and is about a myth Poussin painting is just a simple landscape painting with no story. The final difference I saw was that while Rubens painting was about a struggle

Cole focuses on the American landscape and mixes idealism and realism into his paintings to really get viewers to admire nature and its beauty. He believed that landscape painters needed to have strength determination, and courage to overcome Mother Nature’s more turbulent side.

He was active in the running of the Federal Art Project during the 1930s, he later became assistant professor of fine arts at the University of Iowa. Regarded as “chief philosopher and greatest teacher of representational U.S art,” he was also a vehement proponent of cultural nationalism. He asserted that “A work which does not make contact with the public is lost.”“All the really good ideas I’d ever had had come to me while I was milking a cow. So I went back to Iowa.” He believed artists should adopt a narrative style an create art based on what was unique to the American experience. He created a world where men and women worked collectively for the common good. As in American Gothic (see fi.3), the man and woman’s stern face expressions remind us of the puritan ancestors who worked hard and led a abstinent life. This painting was seen a depiction of the steadfast American pioneering spirit which would rekindle people’s pride in who they were and where they had come from. (Haskell) He created this fable of American resilience and strength when he found a cottage which was designed in the Gothic Revival style with a distinctive upper

Robert Greenleaf and James Hunter are both experts when it comes to leadership. Greenleaf coined the term “servant leadership” and published his first essay regarding this topic in 1970. Hunter is a world renowned author and speaker because of his leadership forte, and has worked with thousands of business executives on developing leadership skills that create successful businesses (Hunter 1998). Both of these men are distinguished professionals because of their philosophies and approaches to efficacious leadership, but they each have a different approach of how they present and represent these ideas.

There was one particular work of art that stroked me the most, perhaps for its simplicity: A Sergeant entering through the door, wearing his military uniform and a gun in his hand, it seems like it takes place in the late 60s maybe early 70s. In one of this pockets there is a folded note, could someone had died? Was that the notification of it? I questioned. There are a few rocks propping the door to a residence house, while the Sergeant’s attention is given entirely to his love interest, another man, who is sitting on a chair, covered with a blanket all the way from his hips to his feet; the Sergeant is embracing and kissing the man sitting. When I saw the painting I asked him the meaning of it and he replied: “Kid, it is not a conundrum. You give art your own interpretation. It means whatever you think it