preview

John Donne's The Flea

Decent Essays

The comparison of sex to a flea is quite the unexpected plot of a love poem, but John Donne’s “The Flea” is not the usual love poem. In the poem, the speaker addresses a lady who he is attempting to convince to participate in unnamed sexual actions with him. She, apparently sticking to the appropriate tradition of her time by maintaining her virginity, cannot be convinced. The speaker uses ridiculous arguments, which he switches stance on a couple of times, and the device of conceit,or an exaggerated metaphor, to explain the need for the woman to take part in his desires. The speaker begins his argument by drawing the attention of the lady to the flea. He tells her to “mark,” or notice, the flea (line 1). He then uses the size of the flea to …show more content…

Seeing that his previous argument had no effect on the lady, the speaker tries a new approach. The speaker says, “Oh stay, three lives in one flea spare,” delaying the death of the flea and telling the woman if she kills the flea, she will be killing the both of them as well (line 10). He is so desperate to be with her that he will do whatever it takes to convince her. At this point in the poem, he begins giving the impression that the mixture of their bodily fluids within the tiny flea is sacred. In fact, he says that in the body of the flea, they are “more than married” (line 11). He even says that the great thing about the mixture of their blood inside the tiny body of the flea is that no one can do anything about it: “Though parents grudge, and you, w’are met,/And cloister’d in these living walls of jet” (lines 14-15). The speaker has, at the drop of a hat, completely turned his argument around. He now makes this out to be the biggest deal, even telling the woman that the flea “is you and I” and that killing it would be “sacrilege” (line 12, 18). But even with the speaker’s twisted logic at work, the lady is just as persistently sticking to her morals and denying the speaker his …show more content…

She then claims that she “find’st not [her]self, nor [him] the weaker now” (line 24). Basically, she has disproved the speaker’s theory of their figurative lives within the flea. The speaker, still determined to change the woman’s mind, just decides to use this to his advantage. Once again, changing his argument, he claims that the flea is guilty of nothing and that she thinks she has “triumph’st” (line 23). If this is so, he argues that what the flea has done is nothing, then really, she should not fear any sexual contact with him because this sexual contact would also be nothing. He claims that her reluctance is solely based on “false fears” (line 25). If she would just give up her virginity to him, yes, it is possible her honor “will waste”, but that honor is worthless, just as the life of the flea (line 27). Now that the speaker is back to his “no big deal” argument, he insists she would do no more harm to herself than she did when she killed the flea (line 27). Considering the ridiculously stretched logic used in the speaker’s arguments, one can reasonably assume that he never convinced the woman to take part in his sexual wants. It is clear that he never provided strong enough evidence to change her mind, and it is hard to believe that the speaker could have been expected to be taken seriously with his poor justifications. Though he

Get Access