preview

John Locke: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

Decent Essays

Critical Reflection 4 John Locke: Essay Concerning Human Understanding David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Immanuel Kant: Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals The purpose of the passage is to discuss the reasons why Locke is right in terms of disagreeing with the notions of innate. The way I will achieve this is by agreeing with points made by Locke against the principles of innate. According, to the innate human beings have specific knowledge when they are born that is they are born with some inborn knowledge. And according to Locke’s view point this is not true. He says that man gains knowledge and skills from his experience. I also agree with him, because a newborn infant does not know how to perform certain functions. He is fully dependent on his mother. And when he grows he learns everything from his …show more content…

The way I will achieve this is by sharing the reasons of agreement with points made by David Hume. His writing was not difficult to understand, he clearly mentioned the two types of philosophical thinking and distinguished them with strong viewpoints. As stated above, I agree with his best opposition made against the second philosophical thinking, according to him this type of thinking is not related to science. Philosophers like, Aristotle and Locke have made their points confusing, only some points could be related to science. In today’s time everything is science so, the points which are vague should be left and now the worth and understandable principles should be studied carefully, as mentioned by Hume. I feel that the principles or the theories given by philosophers which are proved correct by the science, should be encouraged. This way there would be less to study, but will be more meaningful and significant. So, I wholeheartedly endorse what David Hume has stated in his

Get Access