John Roberts Research Paper

Robert Bork was nominated by President Ronald Regan on July 7, 1987 to replace Justice Lewis Powell Jr. who was retiring that year. Bork was rejected by the Senate and Anthony Kennedy replaced Justice Powell. He was defeated by 58 (against) to 42 (for), which is noted as the largest margin in history. There are many reasons why Bork was rejected because of his views on certain topics, his controversial articles, and other things.

The above facts and details of appointments serve as great strengths for Greenburg, but there are also weaknesses she failed to touch on and include in this book. Greenburg fails to consider how the same scare-tactic rhetoric used by democratic and liberal senators nearly every time a conservative justice is nominated as well she only glances and summarizes the events of Thomas’ confirmation hearing and the attempted filibuster of Samuel Alito’s nomination. These accounts would have provided more information and context for the book to give a more well-rounded account of these appointments

The United States president, Barack Obama, nominated a longtime federal judge Merrick Garland to take the position of the Supreme Court and replace the former justice, Antonin Scalia. Merrick Garland’s past decisions related to different issues had made him the talk of the town. Although Garland has a 19 year record on the U.S. court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, this does not lend him to a fast evaluation (Mcshane).

While our nation was founded on the principle of a balance of power, coming from the ideology of Baron de Montesquieu, the Judicial, unlike any other branch, does not have regular elections for its positions or terms like Presidency or Congress. Justices are nominated and confirmed for seats on the Supreme Court for life and have the option to leave whenever they choose to, not when they are voted out of office. An example of this is Justice Stanley F. Reed. He worked with the panels for the D.C. Circuit and

Judge Neil Gorsuch is President Donald Trump's selection to fill the Supreme Court seat that was left open a year ago by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Gorsuch graduated from Columbia, Harvard and Oxford, was a clerk for two Supreme Court justices and worked for a period of time at the Department of Justice. He attended Harvard Law with former President of the United States Barack Obama. Gorsuch has served on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Colorado since 2006.

President Clinton and President Obama did not pack the courts based on agenda and it was not for lack of interest. Clinton and Obama did not try to appoint those with a direct agenda. They had a different prospective to appointing justice, as neither one of Obama’s appointments

Many senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy numerous times in the past few weeks. My response is that the judicial role is one in which judges and justices must apply the law, and not make it. Judges and justices have a limited role and these members of the judicial branch should have humility, recognition that we operate within a system of precedent, and be as open as possible in the decisional process with colleagues who are striving to ensure fairness and equality in the constitutional rights for the individuals in America.

After practicing law for a few years in North Carolina, he took up a job as public prosecutor. And after another several years of practicing law, he

Robert Moses has become a controversial figure in urban planning. He has built many important buildings, roads, and parks that make New York City the special place it is today. However, he has destroyed many old neighborhoods and created a different sense of community. Do you think he will be remembered as a positive or negative influence on the growth and development of NYC?

Throughout the many cases that I settled as the Chief Justice of the Supreme court I always felt that I was making our country a better place by protecting its people and rights. This is a notion that I can stand by until my death. I have worked hard to get where I am even though it was not my original intention.

He wanted to further his ability to provide for his family. In 1961. Thurgood was nominated by President Kennedy to a new seat on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. (Dudziak, 2008, p. 101). Marshall was frustrated at how long the confirmation process took. He was given a recess appointment to sit as a judge along with several other nominees until the process was complete. This was a long year for Marshall. It took a year to get through all the red tape of FBI investigation into his background. In 1962 Thurgood was finally appointed and thrilled.

Burger was born in 1907 and his legal career started in 1931 after he graduated from St. Paul College of Law. The most important step in Burger’s life that would be most beneficial in leading him to his career as Chief Supreme Court Justice was becoming active in the Republican

Scalia would make his way into the private sector of practicing law for an international law firm called Jones Day. Even though, Scalia shined as a commercial attorney over the next 6 years, he realized that he had an indebtedness to teach law instead of practicing it, he would leave the private sector in 1967 to become a administrative law professor at the University of Virginia until 1971, where he would be appointed as general counsel for the Office of Telecommunication Policy for the late President Richard Nixon. Scalia’s primary duty would entail brainstorming federal policies for the expansion of cable television. From 1972 through 1974, Scalia would serve as chairman for U.S. Administration Conference,

Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., was sworn into the Supreme Court on September 29, 2005 and was nominated by President George W. Bush. John Roberts, Jr., took the place of Chief Justice William Renquist after he passed away and the seat became open. His political affiliation is Republican and he has worked for

Unlike congress where laws are passed under their influence, the court upholds laws or repeals laws based on constitutional interpretation. These forms of interpretation are applied with both judicial independence, and judicial impartiality. Judicial independence essentially refers to a principle that binds the courts and judges to the law and that their holdings and decision’s should be made without any political and governmental influences (Dammer, H., & Albanese, J. p.159). The Supreme Court, although chosen on a political spectrum, does practice such forms of independence. Such as the case with current chief justice John Roberts, who appointed by George W. Bush a conservative republican, voted for Obamacare’s constitutional validity, and was the deciding swing vote in the case (Tribe, L. H., & Matz, J. 2014). Judicial impartiality is closely related to judicial independence, however it notes that all parties in court be treated as equals (Dammer, H., & Albanese, J. p.159). In essence, while lower courts judges and prosecutors have been known to favor each