Joint Custody Research Paper

Per Reporter: Stephen (paternal grandfather) has custody of the children. A court order signed by Judge Alphonso (8/19/14) states that Timothy (victim’s father) & mother (unknown) should not have contact with the children. Jill spoke with Harrison County CPS who confirmed that the case has been closed. The mother lives in Indiana and is uninvolved. Timothy is a convicted felon and has been in and out of jail since the children were young. Timothy has returned to Stephen’s home less than a year ago. On the night of 9/28/17, Timothy slapped Brianna because she was smarting off to Stephen. Stephen and Brianna were arguing over homework. Brianna has a red bruise on her left cheek. Underneath Brianna’s left eye it’s red and bruised; however, the

The lawyers highly support a joint custody that would benefit the child. The lawyers argue the case on two different aspects.

5- Should a battered spouse who refuses or is unable to sever the relationship with the battered lost custody of children?

I completely disagree with your opinion of giving Marion full custody. The hardest thing for a parent to do is to sign away their rights for their child until they are capable of doing so themselves. There are parents who are homeless or severely mentally ill who refuse to give up their child. This act in itself shows he would never compromise his daughter by doing anything to harm her. Charlie is no longer an alcholic but a functioning law abiding citizen with gainful employment. I do not see any reason why he should be prevented from reuniting with his child. We all make mistakes it is the steps we take to rectify them.

Under the abandoned spouse rule an individual may file as head of household if he/she is separated, but still married if on the last day of the year (which is December 31st) he/she satisfies the requirements of an abandoned spouse-head of household required by the IRS.

In order for nonparents to gain custody of children, they must establish a child-parent relationship; they must be able to rebut the presumption that the legal parent acts in the best interest of the child. Or.Rev.Stat. §109.119 (2015). The nonparents can rebut this presumption by proving that the legal parent is either unwilling or unable to care for their child. Id. The petitioner for custody is or has been the child’s primary caretaker. Id. If relief is denied the circumstances will be detrimental for the child. Id. The legal parent has fostered, encouraged or consented to the relationship between the children. Id. Lastly, the legal parent must unreasonably deny or limit contact between the child and the petitioner. Id. The

I am writing to get you information about getting services started to regain custody of the children.

Thesis: According to utilitarianism, the most morally permissible solution to the debate between separated parents regarding the custody of their children is joint guardianship. According to numerous studies, shared custody, in comparison to sole custody, results in a healthier psychological state for both the parents and the children and provides more stable relationships between the family members, leading to the most overall benefits, making it the preferable choice according to the aforementioned moral theory.

If you think that all states in the United States have the same divorce laws, then you should definitely think again. Divorce laws actually differ from state to state, and they're different in several ways. They differ in terms of legal grounds, residency requirements, spousal support, child custody, and in many more areas.

Child custody disputes can be the most difficult, contentious element of any divorce, especially when the other party is using the child as leverage or a weapon. You may be convinced your former partner is an unfit parent, but without evidence, your allegations may not carry much weight in family court.

From my research when dealing with child custody there are four different types of issues and those four have incommon is that it’s a custody battle over a child or children. The first type is legal custody where the parent has the right to make decisions about the child's upbringing, The second type is physical custody where the parent has the right to

I decided to go through the courts to determine custody because of several reasons. The first reason was because my son’s father was on the birth certificate and, the police stated that if he took my son from me, it would be considered kidnapping. So, it was in essence to protect my son first. Secondly, it was part of the process of getting child support as well as my restraining order. The restraining order was done through the civil courts and, the originally gave me full custody temporarily until the actual custody process could begin. While, I was planning on going through the custody court at some time, I had to begin the process early because of several court standards. Before I was able to put my son on CCAP, I had to put his father on child support or else I would be noncompliant with their orders. Also, with the severity of the reasons for the restraining order, the judge believed that it was necessary for me to begin it immediately. But, going through the process, I understand why many young mothers like me do not go through the courts to deal with this manner.

Parents tend to think of child custody in terms of their right to spend time with, and make decisions for, their children, but in another respect the courts consider it an obligation. Your children have a right to expect support from both of their parents, in whatever form that may take, which is why the parent who does not receive full custody is usually required to pay child support.

time the fathers get primary custody, and forty-percent of the time parents get joint custody.

     The purpose of this paper was to give some insight into the vicious battles that take place over child custody. It is important to mention that raising children is difficult even with two parents, now when there is only one parent the difficultly increases by leaps and bounds. The idea of joint custody seems to sound like a good solution however, Smith (2003) stated