Jolly Develops Himself As A Member Of Congress Essay

People tend to act more upon their emotions and what they are feeling so by using emotional appeals it helps Reagan pull in his audience. When using pathos he is usually talking about peace, war, Americans dying and poverty. He uses pathos to get the audience to feel not only sad but also mad. Reagan says “As for the peace we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this a peace that should be maintained indefinitely” (1). By incorporating the wife or mother of whose husband or son has died for peace into his statement, he is bringing an emotional aspect to what he is talking about. Reagan does a good job of using certain circumstances and words to really make his argument connect to the audience emotionally. On page 2 of his speech Reagan says “ If we lose freedom here, there’s no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth”. This statement sets a heavy tone within the audience. By stating this it is making the audience feel a deep feeling for what he saying, it is a real eye opener. He then goes on to talk about the assault of freedom and how much private property rights are impaired. Reagan says “In a program that takes from the needy and gives to the greedy…” (3). This statement can make the audience feel sorrowful as well as angry. Reagan believes

Bush uses appeals throughout his formal speech to help advance the argument he proposes. While doing this Bush takes his listeners on a roller coaster of emotion, appealing to pathos and to logos, then to ethos and back to

He likes to reference the 2008 presidential campaign and depending on the political opinions of the reader it can conjure up many different emotions in some reader. By using pathos he gets people more interested in the topic of the article by involving their emotions and making it easy to relate to through the use of recent events. He uses an example of John McCain choosing not respond to rumors which he later explains is the wrong way to go about combatting a rumor. In the article he writes,“When John McCain, during the 2000 Republican primaries, was plagued with rumors that he had fathered an illegitimate child, for the most part he opted not to engage with them at all” (513). The fact that this example can be agreed with or disagreed with can bring emotions along from the reader.

The rhetorical device, ethos, is used throughout “Bullhorn,” which is the persuasion of the audience through ethnic such as: their reputation, experience, and values the author exerts through the claim. President Bush contributes all appeals throughout his speech. As Melissa H. Weresh’s, a director of legal writing and professor of law at Duke University, asserts “…it is important to consider not only

Bush uses the first few paragraphs of his speech to introduce several of the people he is working with. The appeals he makes in these lines are excellent examples of ethos, the rhetorical appeal to character. Bush continuously comments on the character of the people around him. He speaks of them as if he knows them very well, almost like old friends. Through this appeal the audience became able to relate to these people and learn a little bit about their character. Some of the people mentioned have large families and are of an honest and selfless nature. Because the speaker’s purpose is to gain support from the constituents for the candidates represented, the appeal to the character of the candidates is a crucial tool that becomes extremely vital to the swaying of the audience to the purposes of the speaker.

He describes the aura of the situation during the Salem March by saying, “the air was thick with doubt, anticipation, and fear” (Obama). The addition of figurative language engages the audience and keeps them active in the argument. He persuades his audience to support his purpose not only by using rhetorical devices but also using a presentation style that engages the audience.

In this speech, the narrator gives an emotional message about dispossession. Not only does he discuss dispossession, but he also talks about the crowd following the law and needing to organize a leader. It was brought up due to a couple being evicted out of their apartment. This speech was a success because his words had a powerful effect on the audience and caused them to become angry. In addition, the narrator got the crowd to do what he wanted them to which was take back the belongings of the couple being evicted back into their apartment. In order for a speech to be effective, it must have a large impact on the people listening. He used an emotional appeal that made this speech the most effective and allowed for the crowd to actually listen. When ranting about the couple to the audience, the narrator states, “Should two old folks live in such junk, cooped up in a filthy room? It’s a great danger, a fire hazard! Old cracked dishes and broken-down chairs. Yes, yes, yes! Look at that old woman, somebody’s mother, somebody’s grandmother, maybe” (277). He is appealing to the crowd’s emotions in order for them to feel bad for the couple and have a strong feeling of displeasure at the occurrence. The narrator succeeded in doing so because the people were outraged and returned the couple’s belongings back into her home. The narrator says, “Look at them, not a shack to pray in or an alley to sing the blues! They’re facing a gun and we’re facing it with them. They don’t want the world, but only Jesus” (279). Furthermore, he used an emotional appeal to rile up the crowd. It was an effective speech for that reason. The narrator’s words were able to have an influence on the audience. Also, the eviction speech was a success because Brother Jack was very pleased with it and invited the narrator to join the Brotherhood. Evidently, it has been expressed that the eviction speech was most effective

He talks about how America is easily manipulated by images. They cannot differentiate between lies in the truth. Many people in America are illiterate or barely literate. They could read somewhere around a 6th grade level. This affects them when they have to vote since they do not make decisions off facts. Moreover, politicians are very aware of that. Their campaigns are made so they could get emotions out of the audience rather than go based off facts. “We prefer happy illusions. And it works because so much of the American electorate, including those who should know better, blindly cast ballots for slogans, smiles, the cheerful family tableaux, narratives and the perceived sincerity and the attractiveness of candidates. We confuse how we feel with knowledge” (Hedges). Politicians use the slogan such as “yes we can” and they would tell stories so we can sympathize in voting for them. They make fake that they will take care of all of your problems as healthcare, schooling, taxes and a nation united. Yet, when the candidate wins, they forget about promise that they made in the campaigns. Matt Taibbi’s article “How America Made Donald Trump Unstoppable” stated, “Like the actual circus, this is a roving business. Cash flows to campaigns from people and donors; campaigns buy ads; ads pay for journalists; journalists assess candidates…Nine out of 10 times in America, the candidate who raises the most money wins. And those candidates then owe the most favors” (Taibbi). This quote shows it does not matter if people vote or not, their votes are not a key factor in the campaigns it is the donors. When the campaigns are over, the illiterate have no voice once again. Politics is not about the ideas about the ideas

His use of trope, “Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate” explains America’s policies with handling negotiations with other countries. Using the phrase “both sides” as well as incorporating logos, he explains why it is logical to avoid war. The use of “both sides” suggest that he isn’t take any one sides part, but is looking at war as a whole, a war between two sides, looking through the eyes of each side and understanding what causes it. He wants us to unite and look at society and its changes positively: “where the strong are just, and the weak secure, and the peace preserved.” His plea for peace both within the country and around the world let the audience know that he genuinely is against war, a terror that they were sick and tired

Throughout the beginning of his argument, Green uses great amounts of emotional appeal to initially convince his audience to accept his ideas. Green understands that he first needs to show the audience that he understands their hesitations. Only then can he truly illustrate how passionate he is about their continued

Using rhetorical jujitsu, he reframes Republican arguments into a context that ensures that his own policies appear very strong. His opponents in the audience were often at a loss, never confident in whether or not they should applaud. Paul Ryan, visible throughout, makes it very hard to discern what policies he supports and opposes by basically having no reaction at all. He shifts uncomfortably in his chair throughout the speech, and barely claps for anything. Obama’s emphasis on a shared American identity (55:00) is ultimately a criticism against both right and left—against the sort of right-winger who sees Obama himself as a strange foreigner and the sort left-winger who sees ethnic or gender identity as the most important aspect of an individual’s identity. Obama’s rhetoric at odds with both of

As Ashley Espin wrote, "It is a catch 22 really, congress doesn't have the time to sort through the bills on their own." (Espin. Discussion 4). This is true that congress has an immense work load, and committees make the work load possible. From the fourth discussion, it is clear that many see committees as a necessary aspect with both good and bad to them like everything else, but many lean to too much power, such as Robert Dalpe who wrote, "If committees acting as gatekeepers are biased to a specific side, an important piece of legislation for the other side of the isle could be potentially get blocked."

The Bastards of the Party documentary was based upon the Crips and the Bloods who are the bastard offspring of the political parties such as the 1960’s. The Great Migration occurred upon African-American migrating from the south in order to escape racism and prejudice in the south as well as to seek industrial jobs. There was a train that would stop through every town but blacks could only depart at Central Avenue. We as blacks were limited to certain neighborhoods and places we could live and go for entertainment.

There is not one rhetorical strategy used in this speech as ethos, pathos, and logos are all seen. Obama appeals to emotion very successfully reaching people affected by racial issues. Obama successfully uses allusion and repetition, along with personal anecdotes to relate with the audience. Ethos is a rhetorical strategy used to appeal to

341). The specific PRWORA case study is used to demonstrate the importance of rhetoric when undergoing policy changes (Gring-Pemble, 2001). The article claims to advance the scholarly dialogue concerning “the negotiation and construction of public policy as a rhetorical process beginning with bill proposals, congressional hearings and congressional debates” (Gring-Pemble, 2001, p. 342).