Jonathan Marks Convincing Quotes

If Phillip Malloy had sued the schools the school would have won. There were plenty of witnesses telling of what Philip did, and plenty of examples of why Philip was wrong.

In his nonfiction text, The Great Influenza, John M. Barry explains that scientific research is an uncertain process. Barry supports this explanation by using rhetorical strategies such as repetition and a metaphor. Barry’s purpose is to prove scientific research is a confident process that allows one to be courageous on the side of uncertainty. Barry uses formal tone with his audience that goes beyond researchers.

John M. Barry, the author of The Great Influenza, writes about scientists and the obstacles they face. He claims that scientists are explorers in the wilderness that is science. There is no charted path to go down and no one to follow. Scientists will always be uncertain, however scientists should possess certain characteristics to overcome the doubt. He appeals to our emotions to explain the necessary characteristics a scientist has to posses. John M. Barry uses anaphoras, motifs, and pathos in his definition of what scientists do.

Within the article titled “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande, the article is a written document of an address at the California Institute of Technology and describes the connection of science to every single human on Earth. This is done because the presenter defines science as “a systematic way of thinking” since science allows humans to contemplate beyond the information being given to them at any time, such as the questions may follow of how, when, where, why, and how? The presenter states the opinion that, no matter what major you are declared as or the type of occupation you hold, science is embedded into the way you are living, despite you not having any knowledge of certain science topics.

Attention Getting Device: John Barry, in his writing The Great Influenza, he states, “To be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage. It is not the courage to venture into the unknown. It is the courage to accept — indeed, embrace — uncertainty.” (Barry 2). During all eras of time, scientists have endured enormous amounts of adversity. Scientists have to maintain a wide variety of skills in several different are to assist them in different circumstances that they endure. Scientists must have persistence due to their main activity being trial and error. This meaning that once they have failed, they most certainly have to being willing to try it again. A scientist also must posses acceptance, as there will be times when they receive results that are not their predictions. Scientist must obtain acceptance to come to terms with the results found in their laboratory. In John Barry’s The Great Influenza, he utilizes metonymy and rhetorical questioning to characterize scientific research.

Attention Getting Device: John Barry, in his writing, The Great Influenza, he states, “To be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage. It is not the courage to venture into the unknown. It is the courage to accept — indeed, embrace — uncertainty” (Barry 2). During all eras of time, scientists have endured enormous amounts of adversity. Scientists have had to maintain a wide variety of skills in several different areas to assist them in different circumstances that they endure. Scientists must have persistence, due to their main activity being trial and error. This means that once they have failed, they most certainly have to be willing to try it again. A scientist also must posses acceptance, as there will be times when they receive results that are not their predictions. Scientist must obtain acceptance to come to terms with the results found in their laboratory. In John Barry’s The Great Influenza, he utilizes metonymy and rhetorical questioning to characterize scientific research.

Who am I you ask? I’m Marcus your neighborhood menace. I grew up a good kid, on the honor roll, playing sports, all that good stuff until my dad came back into my life when I was 11 and messed that all up. Pops was gang member he and was a notorious Drug dealer to the city…. Scratch that he was international. Pops showed me and my big bro Johnny how to hustle, as soon as I started making fast money I knew school wasn’t for me so I dropped out in the 7th grade. My mama sweet Ms. Darlene, may she rest in peace, was killed when I was 8 and ever since I been staying with my grandparents because Pops lifestyle wasn’t stable for an 8 year old.

Mark Malloy was working his normal day job in the office, when suddenly he was given an assignment to a person who went missing with 5.6 million dollars that was from the law firm’s secret bank account. Mark acquiesced to the terms, but really he had no choice if he wanted to the mission or not. In Pleading Guilty, they send Mark to find Bert, the person missing. They want him found so he can retribution the money back he stole. While reading the novel I found three key settings in the book, which is the office Mark works in, the bar, and the court.

In Stuart Firestein’s manuscript, Ignorance: How It Drives Science, he argues that ignorance is unquestionable characteristic of scientific success. He delineates ignorance not as blatant idiocy, but rather as “a communal gap in knowledge” and even postulates that it fosters the greatest research in science, because it is comprised of the dynamic energy required in the journey for scientific innovation (Firestein 7, 15). Moreover, he articulates that ignorance in academia can exhibit itself in various ways, including “the incentive of possibility”, and most importantly, exploration driven by the unknown; it asks scientists to choose “a particular place of darkness” to investigate (Firestein 62). In contrast to his strong trust in these “dark

In the episode “Scientific Studies” on the tv show “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver”, he employs a plethora of rhetorical strategies to depict his point that not all “science” is necessarily science as most might assume; and how we as a people have become blinded and misled because these scientists are contradicting each other's’ findings. He does so by using humor, making comments that some people might be able to relate to, and by presenting basic logic and common knowledge.

2. Page 28 – “Draper capitalized “science” elevating its status from the outset. His point is clear: thinking people choose science; simpletons choose faith.”

The scientific method is followed in pursuit of knowledge by more than the scientific community. Following the methods principles and procedures in a field of study in a well-documented manner can help qualify that field as scientific. The scientific method can be described as a systematic pursuit of knowledge. In Guns Germs and Steel, Jarod Diamond’s argument for historical science is admittedly weak, but credit is due to him for striving towards a more systematic approach to understanding human history. When a soft science for example, political science is compared to a hard science like chemistry, applying the scientific

After reading this book, I was not familiar with many things. For example, Stuart mentioned that science is a matter of taking educated guess which is basically forming a hypothesis. Once your hypothesis is tested over time, it becomes a theory. I was not familiar with that. Secondly, Stuart stated that people put too much standard in facts which is not the true aim of science, but the access to developing new questions which essentially contact the ignorance. I did not know that scientist starts at facts and search beyond the factual statement. I guess when facts fail, that is when they actually start thinking. Thirdly, scientists create a lot of questions instead of answers; I thought they have the answers most of the time.

The current cultural and political environment demands high-quality, meaningful science communication. Trust in experts appears to be under fire with many commentators suggesting that ‘facts’ are losing out in their battle with ‘opinion’. It is clear then that scientists must take a purposeful approach when developing communication plans and disseminating findings. The

The ethos of science was always been about seeking for the truth. Ptolemy wanted to know what was in the heavens. Newton wanted to know about motion and force. Einstein wanted to know about protons and relativity. These scientists and many others have always had that pure desire of wanting to learn the truth about what they were interested. However, if we were to examine the present, scientists today are struggling not because of their truth-seeking journeys but because of the need to produce results so that they can still have the opportunity of keeping their jobs researching the subjects that they have researching for the past few years. In today’s lab, we see researchers scrounging around for grant money and yelling on the phone with