Jose Ignacio Lopez de Arriortua Case Essay

In the Spring of 1984, May 23rd, felling like San Antonio v. Rodriguez was an unacceptable decision, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund filed a suit against William Kirby, the commissioner of education, in behalf of the Edgewood Independent School District. MALDEF’s main concern was the way Texas funds public school, they pointed out the fact that he poorest districts in the state, had $38,854 in property wealth per student, while the Alamo Heights ISD, which is in the same county, had $570,109 per student. (TSHA, 2017) Furthermore, property-poor districts had a higher set tax rate that would amount to an average 74.5 cents per $100 a valuation to generate $2,987 per pupil, while richer districts, with a tax rate of half

Buckley v. Valeo: Buckley v. Valeo was a court case where the judges held limits on how much could be spend on elections. This was unconstitutional to what the count case came out to be

I the writer V. De La Garza was assigned to 1P21 at the Bayshore district unit. I was informed by dispatch to quickly respond to a 911 call. The victim advised her that she was being attacked by her husband at 1234 13th St. Bacliff Texas. Dispatch then hears multiple gunshots and no further response from the victim. Dispatch hears the suspect reload a magazine and continue to fire. Dispatch sends EMS and animal control, after hearing aggressive dog barking turns into the dog squealing as if it was shot or injured.

Jose, who like to be called Joey is a 34 yeares old male who live with his mother Yvonne Romer and step father Luis. He has not contact with his biological father. Jose grew up in New York and lived their until 2006. Jose and his family relocated to the Poconos and lived in the Ranchlands Development in Bushkill since. Jose states that he lkes living in Pennslyvinia, but he missed all the fun activitities at the workshop he used to attend in New York.

Teaching cases are written reports, observations, or strategies that describes a specific example, exploring critical issues and develops a solution. Teaching cases may not always be generalized, however certain aspects within the teaching case can provide the reader with valuable learning tools that the reader can apply to similar situations (Taylor & Whittaker, 2003). Discussing cases is an important way that teachers learn and grow within their profession. Taylor & Whittaker ‘believe that creativity and engagement that case discussions demand will help you be better teachers, not just better storytellers’. This report is written to analyze The Case of Jesus Gonzales. When analyzing a case Taylor & Whittaker describe five key components to consider. They are recognizing the problem, reframing the problem, search for alternatives, developing and implementing a plan of action and evaluating the progress.

In the case of Manny, a seventeen-year-old Hispanic male living in a very rough neighborhood in San Jose, California. We are looking at a gang beating on a local family. This beating included Manny and two other Norteno gang members and four men who were brutally beaten with two of them being stabbed. Also, a woman that was six months pregnant who was hit multiple times in the stomach with a baseball bat. Manny was arrested on four counts of attempted murder. The prosecutor is pushing for him to be tried as an adult. Despite facts leading people to believe that he did not hit the woman, he was found unfit on the last criteria, the seriousness of the crime. He was able to stay in juvenile hall until his adult hearing. He was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to. Do I agree with the sentence? Yes, I do. He was involved in a very violent beating of five people. At age fourteen he pled guilty to rape, this leads me to believe that he will continue to live a life of crime. He lived a rough life without a father and started having violent outbreaks as early as the fourth grade. He was even running around on the streets that young as well. These are obvious signs that he could be involved in violence when he gets older. These are signs that if his guardian would have payed attention to, Manny may not have turned into a criminal. Manny was tried as an adult and rightfully so, with a rape charge on his record and the gang affiliation and the trouble in the household. Along

General Motors, the “mother company” has faced many troubles in the past, and surfaced. A research by the National Research Council in the United States has revealed in 1992 that there had many impacts and future impacts in the automotive industry, indeed; it would affect the jobs and the internal economy. However, General Motors understood the threat potential that this and established strategic plans to revert the trend. Furthermore, whether General Motor Company was able to change the trend, and it saw the internal and external factors, prepared a strategic plan, Holden being the first brand in Australia, with at least just the 10 % of the population compared with the USA, the way to get a plan looks easier. In addition, it is easier to see a trend in countries with low population and good policymakers. In 2008 General Motors faced again the limit to bankruptcy. A fierce plan to develop and a new business association with FIAT made that GM avoid the dissolution. Even do all Europe have had a similar crisis( Boudette & Choudhury,

This case is an interesting one to delve into, because it is difficult to determine what Ceballos did wrong. Ceballos was asked by a supervisor to look over a case that appeared to have been mishandled by the Sheriff’s Office, which after reading Ceballos agreed that it had been. Ceballos followed up by sending a memo to a supervisor and recommended that this case not go forward, however, his supervisors went forward with the case. Ultimately, Ceballos was called to testify for the defense, which led to Ceballos being passed up for promotions and moved to a different location, being the object of retaliation. I believe this case makes it clear that as a public employee, you really have to be careful about what you are saying and how you

Cars are necessities for daily transportation in a modern society. Cars have been part of almost everyone’s lives since the 1930s, when Henry Ford invented the Model T (History.com). Many people are accustomed to a lifestyle with cars. Without them, many cannot get anything done. Every day, cars are getting better and more affordable. Two of the many nations that mass produce cars are Japan and the United States. Both country’s cars have their own strengths and weaknesses. With that being said, Japanese cars are better than American cars because of their reliability, engineering, and price.

In the hyper competitive world of today’s mega corporations controlled by the sway of the stock market, giant old industrial era companies rule over the automobile market in the United States as well as large parts of the global automobile market. Companies such as General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford were at the center of it until the economic crisis now known as the Great Recession of the late 2000s. The whole market was declining in sales with General Motors and Chrysler taking the biggest hits while Ford only suffered decline comparable to foreign automakers’, Honda and Toyota, levels due to restructuring in prior years. However, the tipping point was edging closer to bankruptcy with General Motors and Chrysler that ultimately

Toyota and Honda succeeded in constructing effective supplier relationships because of the methods they used for it. In article they were the following:

In this world of technology and innovation even Ford Motor Company is investing in new technologies in order to improvised their supply chain management, build an environment with interaction between each department as well as suppliers in order to reduce the bridging gap between them. As it is a leader in auto market segment, needs to update and coop with time and technology periodically but due to huge competition from the Japanese auto makers like Toyota, Honda, and Nissan, Suzuki etc., who are strong and powerful with references to the supply chain process management due to which Ford market share dip compared to others as well as the sales also declined. During this time, Ford analysed the situation and thought positively and started improvement in the supply chain management.

1908 was the year William C. Durant founded the General Motors Company in the heart of Detroit, Michigan. Throughout the ups and downs of General Motors, they still prove to be one of the leading companies in automotive production. From the founding of GM in 1908 till present day; General Motors has made strong investments, and joint ventures regarding their company 's’ success. Much of GM’s early investments were to acquire the assistance of other companies, whether it be producing steering wheels at Dayton, Ohio in 1923 to manufacturing differentials and gears in Syracuse, New York. It wasn’t until 1926 when GM started to make a name for itself, leading to subsidiaries in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Egypt, Uruguay, and Argentina. With ultimately General Motors establishing GM Europe, GM Chile, GM Malaysia, GM South Africa, GM Philippines, GM Mexico, GM Peru, and many more in years to come. It wasn 't until 2009 that “old General Motors” filed for chapter eleven recognition, in other words it filed for bankruptcy, but a corporation as vast as GM was able to propose a plan of reorganization to keep its business alive. After inevitable years of losses, declining market shares, and more importantly a plunge in sales the decision was conclusively made; of course this settlement comes with the responsibility of paying its creditors over time.

The Ford Motor Company’s Supply Chain Management ABSTRACT The influx of foreign automobiles that flood the United States market is higher than ever before and American companies are struggling to adapt to this decrease in market share. Ford is one of the organizations that has restructured its supply chain strategy to better integrate suppliers into their system reducing cost and

One factor that adds to the success of Toyota’s supply chain is their relationship with their suppliers and how they do business with those suppliers. Toyota does not simply give their supply contracts to the highest bidder; instead they work incredibly closely with their suppliers so that they can get the highest quality products possible. Toyota uses long-term, just-in-time contracts with all of their suppliers (Winfield & Hay, 1997). Toyota does not engage in any kind of mutual contracts, such as buy-back or revenue-sharing; however, they do take multiple steps to ensure a mutual benefit when they pair up with a supplier. Toyota invests in their suppliers to help them develop products (Liker & Choi, 2004). They also ensure that they share information with their suppliers in a structured fashion. They believe that targeted information leads to results and they ensure that specific communication is relayed to their suppliers at set times and in set ways (Liker & Choi, 2004). Perhaps the most unique aspect of Toyota’s relationships with their suppliers is that they embark on joint improvement ventures together. They set up study groups with suppliers to help both parties learn how to improve operations and send executives and engineers to the supply plants to help them improve processes (Liker & Choi, 2004). These kinds of benefits are described in the contracts Toyota keeps with their suppliers (Toyota Supplier, 2011). The close relationships that