Journal Article Analysis Paper

The human resources process has to accompany both the employee and employer in regard to safety issues. An employee wants the assurance of safe and healthy working conditions; anything less exposes danger to their own wellbeing. In addition employees must take heed to precautions design by the organization. However an employer wants to avoid expenditures in overhead by cutting cost or corners often putting their employees at harmful risk. In addition, organizations also have a lawful obligation in which they have to provide a safe workplace by preventing accidents, hazards, serious injuries or accident-related deaths. Negligence on either behalf can result in determination, fines, citations, work-related

Due to the high rate of illnesses, accidents and injuries in the industry, the organization further developed a hazard recognition program. This was greatly supported by the directives and the standards the organization drafted. The organization also set a safety and health program. This mainly depended on the credibility of management’s involvement in the program. This program provided for the inclusion of the employees in the program. The program also provided for the inclusion of the employees in the different decision making processes such as the safety and health decisions. The employees were also to be included in the decisions that involved change in the work site practices and conditions. The program addressed hazards despite failure by the government standard to regulate it (Brain Mass, 2010).

This reduce in road traffic accidents would also largely reduce other societal costs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that in the US in 2012, crash injuries totalled costs of $18 billion and $33bn in work lost (CDC, 2014). In the UK, the Department for Transport suggests that, allowing for accidents that have not been reported to police, the total value of the prevention of road accidents was £34.3 billion in 2012 (DFT, 2012). This shows that road accidents

Work-related injury is a major public health problem and a worker’s recovery can be shaped by their interactions with employers, healthcare providers and the workers’ compensation system.8 The ideal solution to the real problem is for senior management to commit to a written, proactive, cost-effective, accountable safety, fully funded, and health process that focuses on applied ergonomics and over cost containment. Workers’ compensation is not the problem, but the problem is workplace injuries and illness.9 On average, workers’ compensation covers about less than 25% of the $250 billion estimated yearly cost of occupational injuries, fatalities, and

There is a financial cost to an organization for workplace injuries. Work related injuries have an average cost of $38,000 for wages, lost productivity, and medical expenses.2 Those are just the direct costs. There are also indirect costs. Indirect costs include having to train replacement employees, investigation of the accident/incident, implementation of the corrective actions designed to prevent the accident from happening again, the cost to repair any damaged equipment, lower employee morale and higher employee turnover. Also, having workplace injuries will cause a rise in the organization’s workman’s compensation insurance for several years. Oftentimes the indirect expenses for injuries are more than the direct

Alberge, Dayla. “Concert Hall Simulator Helps Musicians Prepare To Perform.” The Guardian, March 22, 2015.

This part is about what I learned from the OU Library, challenges I faced and how I took notes.

This report has multiple strengths. One such strength is that the report is made to be as accessible as possible, illustrated by “Acronyms and Abbreviations” section. By adding this section, readers can constantly refer back to it when they encounter an abbreviation they do not understand. The report also gives a thorough background of all subjects involved with this incident, including the company and the factory involved in the accident. Specifically, much information is given about parts of the facility, as well as the emergency response. The incident analysis itself was strong and gave insight about how this accident may have happened, along with plenty of evidence. The recommendations are strong and provide sensible strategies to avoid

According to Geller, the perceived best approach to safety in the workplace might not always be the right one. Most organization seek to have the quickest and cheapest approach to improving safety, while others adopt an approach that offers the most benefit but with the least effort (Geller, 2000). While both approaches to safety

The Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012-2022 identifies several priority industries. Priority industries are identified as having a high number of injury and / or fatalities or hazardous in nature (Safe Work Australia, 2012). The foundation of risk management is to prevent incidents from occurring. Accident causation theory are models or tools that are used to assist in investigating incidents in order to prevent recurrence (Boyle, 2012).

As a result of healthcare reform initiatives organizations are emphasizing outcomes-based programs in order to reduce costs and litigation while increasing access to quality care for injured workers within the workers’ compensation system. Although organizations spend substantial amounts of money on Workers ' Compensation insurance, there are fundamentals organizations can consider where appropriate to drive down Workers ' Compensation costs while improving employee health and safety.

The amount of money the worker receives will depend on his or her salary prior to the accident as well as the severity of the injury.

Direct cost tend to be those associated with the treatment of the injury and any unique compensation offered to workers as a consequence of being injured and are covered by workmen’s compensation insurance premiums. Indirect costs which are borne by contractors include reduced productivity for both the returned worker(s) and the crew or workforce; clean up costs; replacement costs; cost resulting from delays; supervision costs; cost related to rescheduling; transportation, and wages paid while the injured is idle (Hinze, 1994). Recent research conducted in the United Kingdom (UK) determined indirect costs to be 11 times the direct costs 11:1 (Health & Safety Executive, 1997). Research conducted in South Africa determined the indirect cost to be 14.2 times the direct costs (Smallwood, 2000). Research conducted in the United States of America indicates the total cost of accidents to constitute, inter alia, 6.5% of the value of completed construction (The Business Roundtable, 1995) and in the UK approximately 8.5% of tender price (Anderson, 1997). However, the issue relative to the COA is that ultimately clients incur the cost thereof. Given that designers are concerned with the optimization of value they should endeavour to contribute to efforts to mitigate accidents.

A critical analysis of a journal article SIEGEL, D. S. (2014). RESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP. Academy Of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 221-223.

In Canada each year, the 28th of April is dedicated to the remembrance of those who lost their lives, suffered injury or illness on the job or due to work-related tragedy (Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, 2017). Beyond the scope of tragedy and injury, what are the effects of these occurrences? According to Legal Professional Brent D. George (2014), the impact of on-the-job accidents can be categorized into financial costs, physical effects, psychological effects and effect on the employer-employee relationship. Perhaps the most obvious would be the financial costs arising from salary expenditure, medical expenses, compensation benefits and productivity losses. One cannot deny the overall impact that this would have on the economy if organizations have to allocate substantial amounts of their financial resources towards the needs of employees arising from health and safety breaches. This affects business owners’ hiring practices as well as their ability to pay wages and provide benefits (Dessler & Chhinzer, 2016, p. 16) which are key elements that attract and retain talented employees. For those workplace accidents that are not fatal, there are also physical effects to be considered which normally include loss of mobility, retirement due to permanent injury and persistent headaches and pains. For the remaining coworkers, there are psychological effects