Judge Law And Common Law System

The judge is the referee between the Crown and the defence who aim to prove their side of the story. The judge ensures both the prosecution and the defence meet the rules of evidence. Consequently, he decides whether the evidence provided

The judiciary system is defined by Article III in the Constitution and Section 2 describes the powers and limitations that court system has. The purpose of the judiciary is to handle interpretations of the laws created by the constitution and any disputes that arises between parties, cases may be brought to the court, the court cannot create cases. There are 3 levels in the court system, which is true for the state judiciary as well as the Federal level. The two lower levels attempt resolve issues while lessoning the burden on the supreme courts. The lowest level of court is the district court aka trial courts,

There is the Constitutional Court, which upholds the integrity of the constitution, decide how constitutional a law is, and to make amendments to it. The Superior Judicial Council’s job is to solve disputes between the other courts. Its judges are chosen by the other three courts and serve for an eight-year term. The Council of State is the highest court for civil law, and its judges are chosen from a selection of judges chosen by the Superior Judicial Council. The fourth and final court is the Supreme Court of Justice and is the highest criminal court, the judges are chosen the same as the Council of State and both groups of judges serve for four-year terms. All of the courts are as coequal as possible and intertwined as one can see in how they choose their judges.

Judges are public officers chosen to rule and administer the law in a court of justice. Whether it comes to cases that have to do with criminal prosecutions or civil lawsuits, the job of the judiciary is to serve as a fair and unprejudiced judge. Judicial power is given in order to

The judge presides in the courtroom. The judge rules on points of law and instructs the jury, about the law that governs each case. Protecting the jury from outside influences is one of the important of the judge’s tasks at trial. The

According to Bohm and Haley (2011) a judge has several different responsibilities in the criminal justice field. Non-court duties begin with determining probable cause, signing search and arrest warrants, informing suspects of their constitutional rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. One of the main responsibilities of a judge is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in accordance with due process. Other responsibilities judges have outside the court room is they are responsible for their court staff, and in some situations could be responsible for entire court houses. In jury trials judges are responsible for allowing the jury a fair

Judges are the referees of the legal system. Judges preside over the court to insure the law is applied correctly and to make sure the legal process flows smoothly. Most judges have to research legal issues, listen to and read arguments by opposing parties, determine whether or not the information provided supports the charges, claims, or disputes, apply laws, regulations, or precedents to reach judgments, conclusions, or agreements, and write decisions or instructions to the jury regarding the claim, case, or dispute. Judges may also impose sentencing in criminal cases and award relief to the victorious parties in civil cases (What is a Judge, n.d.). Judges must make sure both sides follow the rules of the court. They must apply the law without regard to which side is favored, without regard to what what popular

Before going into further discussion I would like to briefly explain the basic conception. Judicial system is designed to punish those people that committed crimes through the system of jury

Most criminal and civil cases are heard in a court room without a jury. Once the case has been heard, the appointed judge with rule a verdict and impose a sentence on the offender. A judge is responsible for ensuring all parties follow the rules of the court. They

Everyone have a specific duty that they are responsible for to help keep the court system going efficiently. There would not be a court system in place if it was not for the staff and the individual people that help run the courts. Unites States court system is responsible for overhearing federal, state, and local jurisdiction complaints. This overview of the players in the world of courts; from the prosecutors, defense attorney, to the judge himself, it discussed their own specific duties that they have from a prior interview, and shed light on the process from the time the defendant is arrested up until the court date to see a

In the american court room there are several people involved. Some of the most important and lawful figures include: the judge, who is the main authority and the one responsible for justice. The prosecuting attorney, responsible for presenting the case against the defendant. The defense counsel, who is in

The Court System in the United States and across the globe are tasked with settling disputes in society. Many different groups of people come together in a courthouse to make sure the legal proceedings run as smoothly as possible. From judges to lawyers, to the people who work behind the scenes, such as paralegals and legal scholars, these individuals are the ones who work diligently to bring closure to any matters that could not be settled outside of a courtroom. And in this paper, we will cover how the court system are organized in what are known as the “model countries”, countries that are well known for their approach to the legal system. These countries are the United States, England, France, Germany, China, Saudi Arabia, and Japan.

A judge interpret the law, assess all the evidence that's presented and also they control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. The most important role that any judge plays are impartial decision makers in the pursuit of justice. Whenever evidence is presented in court the judge is considered to be the "trier of fact" in which he/she must decide if the evidence is credible and determine which witnesses are telling the truth. During this time the judge would then apply the law based on the facts, and determine if its going to be a civil claim on a balance of probabilities or is there proof beyond a reasonable doubt in which the suspect is guilty. If a trial involves a jury, "the jurors become the triers of fact and assess the evidence while the judge takes on the role of legal advisor, explaining the law to the jurors (Roche 2016). During trial the jury must ensure that they are paying close attention to the evidence that is admitted and determine questions of facts that's presented to them in the jury instructions which comes from the

“Judges typically complete the following every day, which is to research legal issues, judges also read and evaluate information from important documents such as motions”. Judges determine if the information presented to the court is correct and is proven to be true to support the the charge or claim. Judges makes a decision on cases that is shown in court and decide if the ruling is being conducted correctly according to rules of law.(“United States pg.

Distinction of roles between judges and juries is a further fundamental difference between the adversarial and inquisitorial systems. In an adversarial system, there is a division of work between a judge and jury. The role of the judge is to adjudicate the issue of law and to ensure that the trial proceeds comply with the procedural and substantial laws, while the role of the jury is to adjudicate the issue of facts as served by the opposing parties based on the law given by judges. Generally, a judge will not interfere in jury’s decision making, but this approach varies subject to matters being decided in the criminal or civil cases. In civil cases, a judge has a power to set aside a decision taken by jury if such decision was not made in accordance with the applicable law. However, in criminal cases a judge does not