Judge's Decision Making Case Analysis

The Viore dire process brings jurors into court to look over a trial and hear what they have to say about it, they will asked questions by the attorney and judge throughout the time they are there. The Viore dire allows the attorney to focus on having a conservation with jurors. According to the book the viore dire is a preliminary examination of a potential juror to determine qualifications to serve as a juror; Preliminary examination of a witness to determine his or her competency to speak the truth. This very important because it provides a fair trail and also can be an advantage during the trial.

The two articles being critiqued are; “Judicial Selection: Part I. Reform: Are Campaign Contributions Compromising the Independent Judiciary?” and “Reform from Within: Positive Solutions for Elected Judiciaries.” Both articles by their titles give away exactly what the writers intend to speak about. The articles in question are opposed to the current method of selection for Judiciaries, that being an election based process in most states. They fear that money, political standpoints, and flashy advertising are getting in the way of Justice being appropriately and justly being administered. They believe that a merit based selection should be utilized in making an individual a Judiciary. The questions these articles aim to answer

Two federal courts, the United States Tax Court and the United States Court of Appeals, reached opposing conclusions regarding a decision classifying a Mr. John Menard’s 1998 compensation as purely salary or as combination salary and disguised dividend. For clarification, a “disguised dividend” is compensation given to a CEO, controlling shareholder, or president of a closely held corporation that is determined in excess of a reasonable salary for work completed.

This decision essentially allowed for the Judicial Branch to be on a more even level of power between the Legislative and Executive branches. John Marshall faced the court with an argument that stated some acts of Congress are unconstitutional which are not binded to the courts. The Judicial Branch has a priority to stand by the Constitution, which can be difficult at times for those members when Congress passed a law that was unconstitutional. John Adams and his Federalists colleagues did everything they could to stay in power. One idea to keep their power was to expand the number of judges in the Federal Judiciary. They passed The Midnight Judges Act which allowed for people to be a judge in the unreasonable hours of the night. Once Jefferson

I, Michelle Estrada, am presenting this letter to you -----the judge name----- to support my father Luis Raul Estrada and Stephanie Ciani Messick during this process of hardship. I am aware that my biological mother, Cindy Estrada, is demanding to have full custody of my two siblings, Christina Marie Estrada and Alex Anthony Estrada.

On Tuesday March 21, Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hearing took place. When asked about Citizens United, Gorsuch replied comically and also stated "approach the law as you find it." In addition, he was asked on his viewpoint on Gideon v. Wainright. He responded by saying that "disliking or liking the precedent is not his job" and "precedents deserve respect and has to be analyzed under the law of precedent." When asked about Roe v. Wade he explained that it is his responsibility to respect the precedent even if he does not agree with that precedent. His strongest disapproval of the president came when asked about Trump's attacks on the Judiciary. He called criticism of the judiciary "disheartening" and "demoralizing."

The first tier of the federal court system is the US District Court. There is a total of “94 district or trial courts” in the United States, “Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Marina Islands” (Court Role and Structure). The cases that are handled in the US District Courts are considered “criminal activity” by Congress and include but is not limited to, “interstate theft of an automobile, involvement in terrorist activities, illegal importation of narcotics” but for the last ten (10) years most have been cases like “embezzlement and fraud, larceny and theft” and “drug-related offenses” (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). Another case heard in the US District Court is that of robbery; which is a type of case that is “uniform in occurrence in each of the ninety-four U.S. judicial

The polarized politics of the Roberts Court article examines the Roberts Court and its relationship to the Obama’s government after the results of midterm elections in 2014. It starts by analyzing the structure of the Court during the past 40 years. The court has been structured by electoral politics and it has been seen to be more conservative, divided and polarized in its decision-making and this reflects the politics of the post-1968 electoral regime. The article also looks at the impact of the 2014 midterm election. The article shows that the control of the senate by Republican will lead to constrain to the president’s ability to shape the federal courts proceeding (Clayton and Salamone 739). There is likelihood of the Republican leaving the composition of the current Supreme Court intact and also leave Justice Kennedy as the pivotal swing vote. It will also elevate the Court as a campaign issue in the coming 2016 presidential elections.

The critical analysis of the jury decision was done with great reach done by Jakes crew. Jake descripts what we learned in class on how to select the jury and how to a trail begins and ends. They also talked about using expert witnesses to the stand like the psychiatrist for both sides which we talked about in class. We also learned in class that the public opinion has a strong connection to the cases with a lot of public pressure and how to deal with it.

Explain the difference between a cash basis and accrual basis measure of performance. Why, in most cases, does accrual basis net income provide a better measure of performance than net operating cash flow? Explain the purpose of adjusting entries as they relate to the difference between cash and accrual accounting.

attorneys were well aware that they needed to work together to help the defendant. Yet, after having talked to attorneys problem-solving courts it was evident that they were satisfied with the work they were doing. Despite the changes from law school and traditional courts, attorneys acted in a professional and efficient manner. They were happy with the work that they were doing and felt as if they were making a difference in the lives of defendants. Attorneys did not feel as if they had conflicting loyalties. My site visits have shown that Hendricks beliefs do not apply to problem-solving courts.

According to the measure, supreme court and intermediate appellate court judges must be appointed by the governor, confirmed by the Tennessee State Legislature, and face retention elections at the end of their terms. This provided the state legislature with some input into the process.Which lawyers are selected to be judges is determined by both informal and formal methods. Major Judges are selected by three different ways. The first way is judges are appointed by executives like governors and the president. The United States Constitution gives power to the President and Senate nominate who will become judges. The second way is they are elected by voters Judges are chosen by a legislative committee based on each potential judge's past performance. Some states hold "retention elections" to determine if the judge should continue to serve.

Another query needs to be resolved is whether drug courts are positive reforms to the criminal justice system. According to Sasha Abramsky, a journalist and a senior fellow at Demos, problem-solving court has the ability to attract defendant to incarceration. She indicates, “mentally ill offenders who completed treatment through the city’s Behavioral Health Court were 55 percent less likely to be charged with a new violent offense than were their peers who had not been through the program” (Abramsky 33) which proves that problem­ solving courts' treatment and rehabilitation tend to improve defendant's mental and physical. Since the system is effective and works really well by reducing people entering the jail and prison, there are more and

From the Atlantic, In the article “One Judge Makes the Case for Judgement”, the article discusses about how one Judge named John Coughenour rebelled against the sentencing guidelines. In great detail, the article talked about a case that Coughenour was working on and how an almost terrorist got thrown into jail for more time than needed. By the end of the case Coughenour’s points and validation about guidelines sentencing came through and the almost terrorist only got 22 years in jail, and not a lifetime. Now the judge travels around the United States visiting prisoners, who he has sentenced, discussing how life has been for them. Throughout the column only two sources were used to write the article,The New York Times and an essay from The

The purpose of this report is to evaluate the performance of the Hamilton county judges, in three different courts. The data is compiled from information gathered over a three year period and includes a total of 182,908 cases handled by 38 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court. The information presented should help determine how many cases have been appealed, reversed, or a combination of stated variables which will help determine the amount of errors made by judges. The judges will also be ranked in order of efficiency, as to how they appropriately handle each case. The information found is as follows: