Judicial Administration Essay

Individual states do not need to follow all interpretations of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of criminal procedure. The states must only abide by what the Supreme Court sets as minimum thresholds for constitutional guarantees. The states are not precluded from developing workable rules governing arrest, searches and seizures to meet “the practical demands of effective criminal investigation and law enforcement.”

The United States government consists of three main branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. Within the contents of this essay, the judicial branch will be examined. The judicial branch of the United States government oversees justice throughout the country by expounding and applying laws by means of a court system.1 This system functions by hearing and determining the legality of such cases.2 Sitting at the top of the United States court system is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of the United States encompasses the federal judiciary, explicitly the judicial branch. This court is comprised of life-long serving Justices who are selected by the President of the United States and approved by the Senate.3 Cooperatively,

A federal court's power to hear any case where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and no plaintiff shares a state of citizenship with any defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Diversity jurisdiction is one of the two main types of subject-matter jurisdiction in federal court.

Search the Internet to find at least one news item about this lawsuit, preferably from a news source in the state in which the incident occurred.

The Federal Court System is one of the most essential and significant functions to help settle a matter. Much work is involved in the application of a body of rules and principals of rulings. The path the Federal Courts have to take in order to be heard by the Supreme Court is a lengthy process. Given millions of disputes every year, it becomes impossible for the Federal Courts to be heard by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has jurisdictions that limit the variety of cases that are clearly defined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has developed specific rules that within the jurisdictions will and will not hear. The Federal Court must show they have extreme and substantial evidence in the outcome of the case. In mootness, the Federal

Federal and state are the main court cases in the United States. Juries are required in federal court, and are used in less than once percent of civil cases are decided by juries. Almost all of the states, however in certain cases, can have a civil jury trail. The United States is one of the very little amount

After three failed attempts at finding a civil case at Howard County Circuit Court about a business related and another two failed attempts at the Baltimore County District Court, I was finally able to attend a civil docket at Baltimore County District Court. The court is located at 900 Walker Avenue, Catonsville, 21228 in Maryland. Most of the cases, I saw when I came at 9: 00 a.m. on November 3rd, 2014 for the morning docket were contract or tort cases and Judge Marsha L. Russell was presiding it as well as encouraged five sets of group to talk Plaintiff Brian DMD Moore vs Defendant Wilbur Lucas, Plaintiff BQ Management, LLC vs Defendant Dameka Carroll, Plaintiff Mercy Medical Center vs. Defendant Melvin R. Cook, Plaintiff Apartment Services vs Bethea J Scherrie and Plaintiff Regional Management vs Defendant Cynthia M Crook. The case numbers for the five cases are 0004632-2014, 0020559-2014, 0020690-2014, 0020636-2014, and 0011960-2014. Another case was dismissed the Plaintiff Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. vs Harvey Singleton and case number 0020400-2014. One other case was continued for another day Plaintiff Damian Banks vs George Sturton/ Alexis Brown.

Some of these cases include Lyng vs Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, Cantwell vs Connecticut, Sherbert vs Verner and Jacobson vs

The American federal court system is broken up into three tiers: District, circuit, and supreme. When it comes to the court system they are broken down into several tiers in both federal and state level. When it comes to federal court vs a state court, they jurisdictional. The united states district court is the lowest level in the federal court system. In the U.S district court, they hold the original jurisdiction (where crime took place). In this court they will hear a criminal case where a federal crime has been committed. Therefore, they are heard in federal court. The district will also hear federal civil cases where someone is suing a government agency for example. If someone is unhappy with the outcome, they can bring it to the court

with each individual case and whether or not criminal chargers were appropriate or not. Before

In there, the citizens can go and ask for help and also file their cases. They resolve disputes by applying the law to the facts of particular cases independently and impartially. When the law is applied to the facts in courts, every party has the absolute right to an arbiter who is independent of the parties to that case and their advocates. One of its downsides is that it can get overloaded by criminal cases and it can take months for a civil or a criminal case to make it to trial. Texans are subjected to the jurisdiction of both federal and state.

This is where the order is given and federal courts have jurisdiction over civil cases between citizens of different states, which is present in the Confusion statute.

When the Founding Fathers constructed up the Constitution, they made it very clear that there would be three distinct branches of the government. These three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, would all play different roles and have to work together in order to make our country run. While the legislative and executive branches clearly uphold a representative democracy, it has been argued that the judicial branch, containing only unelected officers does not, failing to be anything close to democratic. Even though the Judicial Branch is the least democratic, it plays a vital role in preserving democracy.

The two basic types of courts in the United States are trial courts and appellate courts. These two types of courts have two entirely different functions. The job of a trial courts is to determine questions of fact. Appeals courts, on the other hand, must determine questions of law. Appellate courts have the right to overrule jury verdicts and judges decisions due to the fact that an appellate court typically concerns itself solely with issues of law. An appeal is not the time to retry the case or to reargue the facts. In civil matters, either party can appeal the decision of the trial court. Usually in criminal matters, however, only the defendant may appeal a criminal conviction and the state is not

Federal Courts manage their cases by utilizing the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system. This is accessed through a computer and manages pleadings, motions, petitions and other court documents. The access to this system is mainly for attorneys, U.S. Trustees, and bankruptcy case trustees. This can help the court clerk stream line the process of receiving documents, calendaring, and reduce the time spent on filing and looking for documents. The process will make it easier for the court clerk to watch time lines and make sure cases are scheduled appropriately. The CM/ECF should allow more time for the clerk to spend on the docket (U.S. Courts, 2015). The use of CM/ECF will make the process of calendaring and