Judicial Branch Interpret The Constitution

The Judicial Branch is the balancing factor of the Government. It is the listener of the people of the US and it decides on all matters regarding the people. It "interprets the nation's law" (World Book 141). Being able to interpret the law gives the Judicial branch a special kind of power. One of which the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch do not possess. The Judicial branch decides when a law has been broken, to what extent, and how to punish the criminal act. And that is what makes it the strongest branch.

The Judicial branch is the court system that interprets the laws in route to being passed. In the United States, the judicial branch of government incorporates the Supreme Court and the lower courts which are made up by members of Congress. Article 3 describes the Judicial Branch and how the Judicial system includes one supreme court. When there is a case that is really important and they cannot agree upon a single decision, then the case is passed on to the supreme court.

Judicial Branch is established under Article III of the Constitution. It was created to be the weakest of all three branches of government. Each branch has its own characteristics, but what distinguishes this branch from other two is that Judiciary is passive. It cannot act until someone brings case in front of them. Even if some law or act is unconstitutional, courts are powerless to do anything on their own. Contrary to Judiciary, other two branches are active, and have power to attack other subjects.

The judicial branch, or the judiciary, is basically the court system for the United States. Their main purpose is to make sure all laws passed are in accordance with the Constitution, and to resolve any disagreements. The decisions in the courtroom are either ruled constitutional or unconstitutional. They also have judicial review which is the ability to declare laws unconstitutional. The head of the judiciary is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is made up of nine judges, one of which is called the chief justice. The judges are appointed by the President and supported by the Senate if they are in agreement. These judges do not

The Judicial Branch has opened up opportunities for the country of the United States of America in many ways. The Judicial Branch has found new ways to affect our society. They are meant to interpret the laws for our country. They do this to ensure our country is being protected by the

The judicial branch of U.S. government is comprised of the court system; their task is to resolve legal issues and interpret the law.

In the Judicial Branch, the Supreme Court has the power to disregard the Constitution or listen and go along with the Constitution. The Supreme Court also has the power to do the opposite and decide which case goes with the law and ignore the Constitution. This document shows the powers between the Legislative and Judicial Branch. By the system of Checks and Balances between the Legislative and Judicial Branch, The Judicial Branch has the power to reject laws that are unconstitutional from the Legislative Branch. But in turn, the Legislative Branch has the power to approve appointments of Supreme Court Justices from the Judicial Branch. (Page 162 9.2, DBQ Document

This is an informative paper to go over the three branches of the United States government and the role each of these perform to … Each year there are numerous bills that are brought to the judicial branch in the hopes that they can become a law. These laws can help health care to reform, protect patients, and to promote patient health and wellness….to bring awareness to how the United States Government works, and the impact it has on the patient population. There are three branches of the US government that include the executive branch, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch. Each of which is very important to the help the country run and maintain order within the country. Every branch has a specific job, and help to maintain

When the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they created a new system which has lasted and still works today. This system is known as the checks and balances system. For years, this country has used this system to survive. It relies on each branch of government to do evaluations on the other branches. The power of the judicial branch has come into question over the course of history. One example of this was during the case of Marbury vs Madison, where the supreme court decided that their power is to assess whether laws are constitutional.

The judicial branches main power is to limit the powers of the other branches of government. The Supreme Court's power to do this is its power of judicial review, where it determines which laws and policies are constitutional, or allowable, and which are not. the main way the judicial branch is part of the checks and balances system is that they decided whether laws constitutional or unconstitutional this is a part of the checks and balances system because they decided whether or not the law justifies fairness between all people or all parties because if they let any law pass people in the judicial branch could become very over powerful and take control of thing they are not supposed to have control over.

This is the last branch of the three, giving them the ability to make changes or strike down any law, or declaring an act unconstitutional if they wanted. This branch is able to interpret laws into many different perspectives. For example, interpreting laws through judicial review. The judicial branch has the power to review the decisions and acts that both the legislative and executive branches make, then they may determine if they are constitutional or not. Checks and balances is an example of judicial review. The procedures of judicial review may vary from state to state. Marbury v Madison, the case that set up judicial review, is another example of how the judicial branch explained the laws. This case was very complicated. In a view, Adam's appointed judges that supported his party before he left office. Jefferson ordered James Madison not to deliver Marbury's commission. Marbury agreed to bring this problem to court and made a request for Jefferson to deliver his commission. John Marshall, the chief justice, made the decision that the Supreme Court has no approval to order Jefferson to deliver Marbury's commission. This then set up the principle of judicial

The Constitution of 1787 describes powers of the three branches of government, the Legislative Branch, the Judicial Branch, and the Executive branch. Many believe that these branches are equal in power, and equally keep each other in check. This is not the case. Outlined in the Constitution is a case that the Legislative Branch is superior to every other branch. This is not to undermine the legitimacy of the other branches; the Judicial and Executive branches still need to interpret and enforce, respectively, the laws congress creates. This is evident from the very first Article of the Constitution.

The Judicial branch is in charge of reviewing decisions and understanding federal laws. It is in charge of explaining the laws and having the power to decide if the laws are constitutional (Brand). The Judicial Branch is different from the other branches because, the members are appointed by the president and then approved by the Senate. This branch provides a comfort for the citizens to understand that the branches are dedicated to maintain equality and make sure they are fair laws. Even though, the judicial branch doesn’t have much power, it is just as important as the other two branches.

Court which is consisted of nine justices. The judicial branch decides on the meanings of the laws and whether laws break the rules of the constitution. The judicial checks on executive and legislative. The judicial can check executive by declaring executive actions unconstitutional and one example of a federal court in Pennsylvania declared aspects of President Obama’s executive actions on immigration policy unconstitutional. The judicial can also check on legislative branch by declaring acts of Congress unconstitutional. One example is

Stare decisis is the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent. Some judges believe it is important to follow the principles of stare decisis, because it helps guide their decisions based upon similar issues that have already happened. However, some judges do not agree with always following the principles of precedent. Precedent can become discriminating when someone is being judged for another person’s similar actions. That is why it is important for judges to have the option of discarding precedent. There are different ways of selecting judges, such as the popular election and the Missouri plan. Another way is through the judicial selection, where State Governors or Legislatures will personally choose them.