Julie Fisher Case Summary

In this case, there was a Physician-Patient relationship. The patient requested the treatment and the physician agreed to render to treat John Smith. Unfortunately, the physician terminated the relationship improperly when he dismissed the patients' complaints and caused harm to the patient making himself liable for a lawsuit. The theories supporting this lawsuit include medical negligence, medical abandonment, res ipsa loquitur.

I spoke with Ms. Valerie on July 31, 2017, at 6:58 p.m over the phone. Ms. Valerie stated that the client Bryce Linder verbalized that an advocate Leslie McKeown slapped him in the face. Then later she stated that the advocate Catina Hampton slapped him on the left side of his face during a group session, held at the HCAP office Located at 4120 Directors Row Suite D. Ms. Valerie stated that Bryce informed her that Catina verbalized to the client, “I have to slap you because you were being disrespectful during group.” Ms. Valerie also mentioned that Catina filed a CPS report on the family because Bryce stated that his former therapist molested him in the past and no one reported the incident. The advocate went out of town for a family emergency the week of July 24 –July 30. Ms. Valerie stated that Catina Hampton asked her if it was ok to take care of her two dogs during the time that she was out. Ms. Valerie stated that one of the dogs died from overheating and the other dog was stuck under the house.

The case study of Crowe v. Provost, 374 S. W. 2d. 645 (Tenn. 1963), was a highly-anticipated court case for the 1960’s. The following list pertaining to the example of what went wrong and by whom. The first patient appointment opens a file with the patient’s basic information and any allergies including medication(s). This would typically be done with the receptionist. If this was not the doctor’s first time seeing this patient, then the physician should have checked the chart to see if there were any allergies to anything including medication, such as, Penicillin and Cosa-Terrabon. Referring to the Crowe vs. Provost, the child was then rushed back into the doctor’s office with worsening symptoms, the nurse should have listened to the mother. The nurse, could have instructed the mother to take the worsening child to the nearest Emergency Department. The nurse advising the doctor, “That she thought the child was about the same as when the physician saw him earlier in the day” (Flight, M., 2011, page 5-6) was not a good idea. The doctor could have been brought in for an examination of the ailing patient. The receptionist returning from her lunch should not have been a signal for the nurse to leave for any reason with the patient getting worse. Again, the patient and mother should have been instructed to go to the nearest emergency room. The receptionist should not have been left alone with an ailing patient. Mistakenly, the receptionist calling the doctor first and

M was taking a look at his leg that was injured but seemed to be healing. All was thought to be well until one office visit the doctor went across the hall to check on another patient who seemed to have an infected leg. The doctor left the door open where confidentiality here was obviously not being taking into consideration for the patient he was seeing as well as others who were able to hear them. Since the door was open, his parents noticed that he did not change his gloves while entering that other room and came back to check on their son with no gloves on. Dr. M was concerned about Jacobs leg and told him to come back the following week while treating it with antibiotics. The following week he comes back only to see that he has developed osteomyelitis. This was the same infection that the other patient developed while under the care of his supervision. Jacobs delay in his recover cost him the opportunity to play football and a college scholarship. Jacobs’s parents then resorted to suing Dr. M because of his negligence and lack of medical

The organizational ties that the Lees had to the hospital and its staff were characterized by miscommunication, condescension on part of many of the professionals, and mistrust on both sides. That the Lees distrusted the doctors in spite of their training offended the doctors, and the lack of assurance

Beneficence compounded by nurse-physician communication created ethical problems in this case. Mainly, Joanna’s assessment of Mrs. Kelly being ignored by the resident physician and the nursing supervisor. Joanna worked within the scope and standards of practice, she assessed, evaluated, and monitored her patient’s condition. She then reported her findings to the resident twice, and also sought nursing support from her shift supervisor. After Joanna’s first call to the resident, and her continued concern she needed to advocate in a proactive manner. Continuing her assessment of Mrs. Kelly to include palpation and auscultation could have offered additional clinical information enabling her to articulate the problem to the resident and nursing supervisor.

The case was based on plaintiff claims that they were engaged in protected activity of investigating potential false claims submitted by the hospital to the government. According to the suit filed, a doctor on site was involved in a kickback agreement with the hospital anesthesiologist, Dr. Brad Barth, the husband of one of the plaintiffs in the case.

I am a second year nursing student in my third week of the practicum placement on a surgical ward with my co-student and the morning shift registered nurses. We had just finished analysing the patients handover report (Levett-Jones & Bourgeois, 2015) and I had been assigned to work with the registered nurse. I was looking after Mrs. Brown (pseudonym) is 82 years old New Zealander was admitted to surgical ward on the 08/06/16 for multiple SCC removals from L) hand and L) foot with skin grafts.

Mary’s Honor CTR. Melvin Hicks did not have any prior mishaps with this organization. Melvin Hicks jobs characteristics started to suffer from an unknown reason, which optimally lead to his dismissal. Melvin Hicks had a satisfactory work history with St. Mary’s, however, I believe a change of commands caused some miss communication between the 3. Melvin Hicks started to miss rules violation of his commanding officers. Melvin Hicks was not properly doing his job. In the month of March, there was a fight that broke out while he was on shift. He was to complete a incident report, however, Melvin Hicks did not do such thing. Melvin Hicks was promoted since he was not properly logging all information that was happening while at work. Optimally, in June of 1984, Melvin Hicks was discharged for threatening John Powell during an argument. These are 3 incidents that happened all around the same time period, however, was it enough for Melvin Hicks to loose his job? This is the question that every is curious about. What does it take for an individual to loose their job? Does it take 3 strikes in order for the company to say, “your not longer trustworthy?” This cause was very interesting on what happened with the discharge of Melvin Hicks. I have some judgments on what should have happened, however, I am not sure if was enough for him to keep his

Also, Mrs. Glynn informed the doctor that he was hurting her and he told her that it was because she wanted to save tooth # 32 which it was just a wisdom tooth. T he following day which it was Saturday, September 17 in our facility in the North, another issued took place with another patient her name is Jimenez Saida was schedule for extraction 16, 18 and 19, but on this day Dr. Sadati only performed extraction on tooth # 18 because while he was extracting this tooth Dr. Sadati yelled to the patient “Open your fucking mouth” this patient speaks English and Spanish and she understood. Furiously Mrs. Jimenez got up from the chair and walked to the front area and complaint about how rude and disrespectful how she was treated by the doctor. In this occasion our dental assistant Dwight was assisting the Dr. and he witness this incident. Both of this patient’s have not come back to our office due to the fact that they were not treated with respect, but I am sure that they would be willing to testify these

She called requesting to speak with Dr. Rosenblatt , to give a formal complaint about Dr. Cano . The patient was upset that Dr. Cano verbally told her before he went on vacation, he was going to place iron infusion order for this week.

RT informed writer that she had an appointment on 5/9/16 with the nurse for a genetic testing but she wasn't able to come into the office because RT claimed that was not feeling well. RT stated that she had "body pain"; Therefore RT showed up today 5/10/16 to meet with RN Chandani and to meet with CM Sanny. Due to the fact that Sanny was absent, writer was told by Supervisor Marly Jourdain to meet with RT. Writer did inquire about RT's health and how she was feeling and RT ensured writer that she is feeling much better but still feel a "little drowsy". However, RT said that she is taking her medication and eating well. RT communicated well and was thankful to writer for meeting with her.

Another incident that occurred with Bishop involved was on December 19, 1994, Dr. Paul Rosenburg and his wife returned home to Newton, Massachusetts after a Caribbean vacation, Dr. Rosenburg started

The worker also complained of being issued with numerous warnings, and that his supervisor persistently put pressure on him to return to his original issues. Dr Ewer noted that the worker felt that his supervisor gave him difficult duties to try to get him to resign. He perceived this treatment as unfair and unwarranted and he believed that he was given the warnings because he had made a claim for workers

She stated the diagnosis was incorrect; any internet forum or WebMD will concur that her son’s symptoms are in relation to a concussion. Further into our conversation it became apparent the mother was more upset about the duration Dr. Yadla spent with the patient. She informed me the resolve of her complaint was to bring it to a higher authority and express her concern with the quality of care, or lack of care at the Hampton Cove facility. I stated to the mother that we will look in to the encounter and I apologize for any inconvenience, and I hope to see her return to our facility. After speaking with the mother, I talked to Dr. Yadla – She made it clear that there were no symptoms to confidently diagnosis the patient with a concussion, and