Julius Caesar And Brutus Rhetorical Analysis

Both Brutus and Antony from the play “Julius Caesar” have compelling speeches at Caesar’s funeral that move the crowd emotionally. They were able to do this by using 3 things ethos, pathos, and logos. All three of these things have different meanings and confronts an individual’s emotions a certain way.

In Shakespeare's tragedy Julius Caesar, Portia uses repetition, rhetorical questions, and parallelism in order to persuade Brutus to tell his secret. Portia uses repetition to get Brutus’ attention and to show him how much she wants to know the secret. Pleading, Portia urges, “I should not need, if you were gentle Brutus. / Within the bond of marriage, tell me, Brutus” (2.1.301,302). By using repetition she gets Brutus’ attention so he knows she is talking to him. If Portia did not repeat his name, Brutus would not be as inclined to listen to her. With Portia stating his name more than once he is focused on her and knows that what she is saying is vital. In this part of Portia’s speech she uses pathos. She persuades Brutus by bringing up their

Words are more powerful than swords, but what makes this true. In these speeches Antony and Brutus’ pathos logos and ethos to portray Shakespeare belief that logos in combination with pathos wins arguments.

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, an honorable man, Brutus, is planning to overthrow the soon to be king, Julius Caesar. Brutus is persuaded by Cassius that Caesar is a liar, too ambitious, weak, and not fit to be Rome’s king. Brutus soon believed Cassius, and they and the conspirators made a plan to kill Caesar. After Caesar’s death, Brutus planned to justify his actions of killing Caesar at his funeral in his speech to the people. After Brutus’s speech, the citizens of Rome were all in agreement that Brutus did the right thing for Rome. Brutus then decides to allow Caesar’s best friend, Antony, to speak in honor of Caesar. Antony speaks, and he convinces the citizens that Brutus’s actions were unjust and turned the people against Brutus.

Many people know that Julius Caesar was betrayed and killed by many people who he had thought to be his friends. Some less common knowledge is that he did still have friends and others who stayed loyal to him. One man named Mark Antony was the most loyal of them all, even after Caesar’s death. When he found out Caesar had been killed, he began plotting to get on the traitor’s good sides and make it seem as if he had joined them so that he could convince the citizens to fight against them with him. He deceived the traitors and convinced them to let him speak at Caesar’s funeral, and in this speech he turned the citizens against them using very powerful rhetorical skills. After he had drove the traitors from the city, he took control of the city and led them to victory in a war against the conspirator’s armies. These are three telling examples that prove Antony’s skill and potential as a leader.

Brutus is the first one to speak at the funeral and explains why he killed Caesar. Explaining to the crowd how “[Caesar] was valiant [and he] honor[s] him” for that,“[Caesar] was [too] ambitious,” which is his reason for killing his so-called beloved friend (III.ii.25-26). Brutus sounds logical in his speech, but there are no real facts supporting Brutus’ reason for how ambitious Caesar was. Still, according to Brutus, since Caesar was dangerously ambitious there was “death for [for him being ambition]” (III.ii.26). Brutus’ tone suggest that it was an obvious decision to kill Caesar, yet, again, he fails to prove his words without any facts. Similarly, Anthony uses logos, too, but he is more successful with the use of it. Antony disagrees that Caesar was ambitious and continually questions why Brutus believed that. Antony recalls an event when Caesar had “brought many captives home to Rome” giving a large amount of wealth to Rome, which makes the crowd’s preference change about Caesar (III.ii.86). Antony has proven his statement on how Caesar was not ambitious and what a great deed he actually did for Rome. Antony uses logos in his speech the correct way, by supporting his words with facts. Brutus and Antony both had convincing speeches; Antony ultimately is more successful by presenting real facts in his speech, while Brutus only sounded

In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the two characters known as Brutus and Mark Antony delivered two very different speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus' speech was delivered while using the appeal to logos which shows how his character relied on logic and reasoning rather than using his emotional point of view. Mark Antony's speech had an appeal to pathos as he used emotion and pity to prove his point and influence the audience. These two speeches show how Brutus relies on an appeal to logos and Mark Antony relies on an appeal to pathos.

Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to articulate the points of many characters. More explicitly the use of different rhetorical strategies can be seen after the death of Caesar. Preceding Caesar's death speeches were given by Mark Antony and Brutus. In these speeches Brutus tried to justify Ceaser death with vague answers, while Mark Antony came to the support of Caesar and questioned why he really had to die. Brutus and Mark Antony's use of logos, pathos and ethos, allowed them both to give effective speeches. Although Brutus gave a strong speech, Mark Antony exceptional use of pathos and ethos provided him a slight edge over Brutus.

He does not want Caesar to be crowned king. Power meant more to Brutus than being noble to Caesar. The actions of Brutus do not reflect his intentions of being a nobleman. Contemplating the assassination, Brutus invokes the familiar Elizabethan analogy between the body politic and the body natural. In so doing he invokes the symbolic framework which establishes the relationships among the diverse issues and actions of the play and provides, in this case, an implicit refutation of the position he is about to take. For Brutus' political miscalculations, rather than being the almost inexplicable mistakes of a supremely virtuous character, are the manifestations of a clearly defined moral failing. Brutus, of course, misses the point of his analogy. Sensible of the hideousness of the "Insurrection" within the "little Kingdome" to which he likens himself, he does not go on to deduce, as he might be expected to, that "Rebels [ought] by the Justice of the law to be suppressed, even as the

The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

During the funeral scene, Brutus and Marc Antony included pathos in their speeches to evoke pity and sadness for the people of Rome. Brutus applies some examples of pathos throughout his speech. In lines 23 -25 Brutus says, “I weep for him. As he was valiant, I honor him.” This quote implies that Brutus did not kill Caesar out of hate. It demonstrated to the crowd that Brutus really did love Caesar. Brutus also said “there is tears for his love,” meaning that he is sad that Caesar is gone. While Brutus included some pathos in his speech, Antony’s entire speech appealed to emotion. Antony used pathos to find a connection with the audience. In his speech, he says “My heart is there in the coffin with Caesar.” This showed the crowd that Antony

In the tragic play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the ruler of Rome, Julius Caesar, is stabbed to death by some of his so-called friends. Brutus, one of Caesar's best friends, is approached by some of the other senators to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar. Brutus weighs his options and decides to join the conspirators for the good of Rome. At Caesars's funeral, Brutus gives a speech to convince the citizens that the conspirators were right to kill Caesar. In contrast, Antony gives a speech to convince the Romans that there was no real reason to kill Caesar. Both characters try to persuade the audience, but they achieve different tones using literary and rhetorical devices. The tone of Brutus' speech is prideful, while the tone of Antony's speech is dramatic and inflammatory.

Roman politician and popular figure in the Roman Republic, Mark Antony, uses the rhetorical devices of pathos, logos, and ethos in his funeral oration for Julius Caesar, in order to deem the assassination of Caesar by Cassius, Brutus, and their conspirators, wrong. The speech conducted by Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar’s, has a sorrowful tone due to the fact that Mark Antony wants the crowds of Romans to agree with him. Antony conducts his speech in such a way to strike pity and regret in the assassinators and conspirators of Julius Caesar. Usage of pathos, ethos, and logos is essential in winning over the plebeians trust and respect.

The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome. In Brutus’s speech, he uses devices such as rhetorical question and antithesis to convince the Romans that he and the conpirators did a good deed by killing Caesar. In Mark Antony’s speech, he sways them to believe that Caesar did not deserve to die, and that the conpirators were the real enemies by using rhetorical devices like rhetorical question and apostrophe. Both speeches were very