Julius Caesar Research Paper

The fall of the Roman Republic was caused by the expansion of Rome, and it’s class tension, the ruling of Julius Caesar, and all things that followed Julius Caesar’s

Finally the roman republic and the roman empire were similar in their downfall and collapse. In the roman republic landed aristocrats took over state owned land and bought out small peasant owners to develop large estates (latifundia). Because the number of small farmers decreased the number of men available for the military decreased as well. This then led to the army recruiting poor that hadn't owned property. When they decided to take advantage of this military system a civil war broke out... 35 years later Caesar was stood as dictator of Rome. He ruled for three years but was quickly

From the fall of the last king of Rome, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, in 509 BCE, to the beginning of the principate in 27 BCE, the Roman Republic thrived as a strong and relatively stable government. This was despite its two major issues that eventually led to its downfall- the class struggle between plebeians and patricians as well as the autonomy the military had that allowed for armies to become loyal to its commander rather than the Roman state. For centuries, these issues were kept under control and the Republic was able to grow throughout the Western world. However, starting with more radical figures such as Tiberius and Gaius Gracchi and continuing to Sulla, Pompey, and Caesar, these

On March 15, 44 BCE, Julius Caesar was attacked by a group of conspirators and died within minutes due to multiple stab wounds. Before he was murdered, he was an adored consul of Rome, though some people believed he was gaining too much control and had to be stopped. While there were many conspirators and it is difficult to pin the blame on any specific person, the Casca brothers delivered the fatal blow. Therefore, they are responsible for the death of Julius Caesar.

Rome was growing and it was becoming incredibly wealthy after the Punic wars, but the republic was facing serious problems during this time. Many Roman politicians took bribes and they would encourage the forming violent mobs to aid them in rising to power. Soldiers returning home from the wars were unable to find employment because wealthy landlords were utilizing slaves to get work done instead of hiring Romans. During this period of time the republic was part of several civil wars. Many of the Romans wanted a strong leader to take them to glory; therefore, the way was paved for Julius Caesar.

The Roman Republic was a “democratic” republic, which allowed first citizens to vote, and to choose their governors in the senate (Hence, their consuls). However, it was a nation ruled by its aristocracy, and, consequently, the entire Republic`s power was concentrated in a few individuals. Furthermore, the Senate was controlled by Patricians, which directed the government by using wealth to buy control and power over the decisions of the senate and the consuls. This situation aroused the inconformity of the people; as result, a civil war took place in the Republic (destroying it), and then the Roman Empire was born.

Summary: “Achievement of Julius Caesar in Ancient Rome” by Baivab Ghosh explains how the Roman felt about Caesar and his time in Rome. Julius Caesar became well known in the Roman society whenever he joined forced with Pompey and Crassus to create a Triumvirate. After they had their plan of rule Caesar was appointed 40,000 troops to begin his expeditions. After Julius Caesar lead his soldier through many different countries conquering each one his soldiers came to view him very highly as their leader. Later, Crassus died in war leaving Pompey and Caesar to rule alone. Eventually Caesar and Pompey came to have a civil war with one another which ended with the defeat of Pompey

In the civil war of 49 BC Pompey and Caesar, both strong military leaders, went head to head in order to achieve the absolute power. Caesar appeared exclusively focused to defeat his political and military opponents rather than truly take in consideration the problem the Republic was going through. By Ceasar’s consolidation of power things truly started to differ from their original and traditional roots. During his power from 49 BC to 45 BC, the republic had undergone through a series of civil war, and following Caesar’s final victory, indicated him as a combination between a dictator and a consul. The senate negatively perceived his disregard for tradition, his arrogance, and his violent pursuit for personal realization. He appears as being too occupied planning new territory conquests rather than consolidate his position within the Republic. Right before he was killed, he was planning to go against the Parthians. As he was discussing his tactics with the senate, on march 15, 44 BC the dictator for life, Julius Caesar, was silenced once and for all with twenty-three stab wounds from members of the senate. The people of Rome were not satisfied with how the Senate had

Emperor Augustus, born Gaius Octavius, on the 23 September, 63 BCE. He was the adoptive nephew of Julius Caesar, and so, inherited a large portion of Julius Caesar’s wealth and property, when Julius Caesar was murdered by members of the Roman senate in 44 BCE. Augustus, using the wealth left to him by Caesar, began his journey to becoming the Roman Empire’s first Emperor. From the age of 18, Augustus masterfully navigated Rome’s political arena, eliminating any who tried to rival him, until finally in 27 BCE, he was finally in full control of the Roman Empire.

For 350 years the Roman Republic had grown, retracted, and grown again, surviving and thrived. Through it all the Romans never turned away from their basic founding principle that no king shall rein in Rome. Every year men stood for election and every year free ballots were cast by free citizens. The winner won and the looser lost, and power was transferred between them. It was a remarkable run and the republic’s track record was and is the case of much justifiable envy. The Roman’s success would be the undoing of the Roman republic. Over the years the republic had survived for two major reason, the lower class had not been so impoverished that they

There are two specific men that want to kill Caesar. These two men are very different and here’s why, The two men are Brutus and Cassius. Brutus is a much loved man, while Cassius is not. They also live in Rome. My thesis is that Cassius plans to take out Caesar and he is very fain about tit.

In the midst of a failing republic, Rome was the epitome of chaos. Leaders acquired power by demanding loyalty among their troops, and yielded power through bribery and flawed checks and balances. It was a scene of populist fervor and patrician setback, marked with multiple civil wars. Mainly, conspiracies, sedition, and revolution plagued the years from the Gracchi into Caesar’s death. The sources of contention included the rampant inequality between the plebeians and patricians, the previous of which were discontent with the little social mobility and mistreatment by laws.

One important event was that Caesar had adopted his grandnephew Gaius Octavius (or Octavian, 63 B.C.E.–14 C.E.), then a young man of eighteen (Cole Symes, & Stacey, 2012, p. 120). Caesar was assassinated. Octavius ran for election in office even though he was young (Cole Symes, & Stacey, 2012, p. 120). I think that Octavius loved and respected his uncle, which resulted in him working hard to outlaw and punish the men who killed Caesar. He knew that justice had to be served. To avoid confusion,historians therefore refer to this phase of Rome’s history as the Principate, from the title Augustus himself preferred: princeps, or “first man.” (Cole Symes, & Stacey, 2012, p. 124).

Roma Taranto Essay outline: How is death presented in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar? Thesis statement: In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the presentation of death is determined by personality, as characters with devious natures receive merciful deaths, while those with honest natures suffer violent deaths. Paragraph idea one: Imagery of devious character’s death (compare with honest character) Evidence a) “... when my face is covered, as ‘tis now, / Guide thou the sword…” Act 5, scene 3, lines 48-49 → Cassius’ peaceful death.

Gaius Julius Caesar Octavian hereinafter referred to “Augustus”, was given the title of imperium by age of 19, to gain this, he amassed a private army and marched on the Senate in Revenge for his adopted father’s murder. Augustus developed a peaceful and cultural Ancient Rome . In contrast, both Caesar and Sulla before him, were appointed to dictator under the Lex Valeria (Valerian law) , both had ultimate goals of monarchy, but where Caesar, used the people to ascertain if this would be accepted , Sulla ruled with an iron fist.