Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

The use of the persuasion elements of pathos,logos, and ethos by the characters of julius caesar was very important in terms of the series of events that occurred. The most persuasive characters in the book are brutus, antony, and cassius. Each of these three characters used pathos,logos and ethos throughout the book But each of them only really stood out with their use of one of the three. The ability of Marc to persuade the people of Rome who were against him to believe in his point of view showed incredible use of pathos. While, Cassius’s use of ethical appeal in his dialogue to brutus showed a fascinating usage of three elements but mainly ethos. And finally, brutus showed the best use of logos with his speech to cassius and the conspirators.

In Roman history, some elite men held certain values that they felt strong enough to take their life in order to defend it. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there are certain characters portrayed to show how a person’s values or ideas can change their behavior and influence some significant decisions. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus, supports this thought by having an idealistic view on the world and by showing his patriotism toward Rome. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus as an honorable, idealistic man in order to show the depth that a high-class Roman man will go through in order to defend his honor.

In the tragedy Caesar was the emperor of Rome until his own senators killed him. The senators claimed they had to kill him because he was getting to ambitious and it was getting worse. They had to save the citizens before they start to get hurt by Caesar’s actions. The most ethos, pathos, and logos takes place at the funeral when Brutus and Antony talk about why Caesar had to die. Ethos, Pathos, and logos are all used in the tragedy of Julius Caesar’s funeral scene, some more effectively than others but they are all used to persuade the crowd one way or another.

To start his speech, Antony opens with some kind words about Caesar. Antony uses ethos by speaking kindly of Caesar and saying, “He was my friend, he was faithful and just to me” (line 81). Antony appears to be a honest and humble man mourning for his friend. By saying “Brutus is an honorable man” (line 83), Antony places himself on the crowd’s side because up to this point the crowd is in favor of Brutus. Antony has made himself seem more trustworthy which also utilizes ethos. He then continues to speak of Caesar’s great deeds that do not support Brutus’s claim of Caesar’s ambition. For example, Antony tells of Caesar saying, “He brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms brought wealth to the city” (line 83). This is all Brutus wants Antony to say but Antony continues and asks the crowd, “Is this the work of an ambitious man” (line 89)? Antony is using logos to influence the Roman people because he provides a counterexample to the claims of Caesar’s ambition. Furthermore, Antony places doubt in Brutus by saying, “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (lines 91-92). This use of logos allows Antony to prove Brutus wrong, even if he does not say it out loud.

Brutus steps out to the capitol and informs them about Caesars death and proceeds to give them an explanation on the reasoning of his death. During Brutus’s speech he appeals to the audiences emotions by stating “There is tears for his love, joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition.” Brutus uses the strategy Pathos because this statement appealed to the audiences emotions and more than likely made them feel sad or maybe mad. Brutus also states that “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men.” By saying this Brutus is trying to explain to the crowd that if Caesar was to had stayed alive then

The plebeians loved Caesar before his murder and praised Brutus after it. Antony was trying to remind the citizens about the great accomplishments Caesar had done for Rome before he passed because the citizens turned on him. In (III,II,CI) Antony cries "What causes withholds you then to mourn for him?" The citizens seemed to forget how generous Caesar was and stopped praising him. Brutus's use of pathos was more of him trying to convince the citizens that Rome would go downhill if Caesar ruled. In (III,II,XXII) he says "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" He wanted to make himself out as a hero by saying that killing Caesar was best for the community of Rome. Antony's use of pathos was more convincing that Brutus's because it sounded more as if it was coming from the

The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

One way Brutus uses ethos is when he says, “Believe me. I’m a good guy, I’m one of you.” He is using his words to get the audience to see that he made a noble decision by killing Julius Caesar because Brutus has the same morals and values of other Romans. Brutus uses logos when he describes Romans being enslaved if he had let Julius Caesar live, he tells truth that he was right to kill Julius Caesar. Brutus is willing to do anything for Rome, he expresses his loyalty and love for Rome throughout his whole speech, by using pathos to connect with the audience on an emotional level. A rhetorical question is when Brutus asks, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men.” He uses the rhetorical question to show that Caesar was a tyrant and was treating them all

In Mark Antony's funeral speech for Caesar he uses pathos to convince the plebeians that the death of Caesar is a tragedy for the people of Rome. By using Brutus’s betrayal of Caesar, “And as he plucked his cursèd steel away,Mark how the blood of Caesar followed it, As rushing out of doors, to be resolved If Brutus so unkindly knocked, or no….” emits sympathy from the Romans that “Caesar’s angel.”,Brutus, helped kill him. To convince the Romans more Antony

Brutus Rhetorical Analysis Essay William Shakespeare, a writer regarded as the greatest poet in history, wrote the play Julius Caesar about the first Roman dictator Julius Caesar in 1599. The play largely describes the struggle for power in the aftermath of Julius Caesar’s assassination; a Roman senator named Brutus, who was a leading contributor to the death of Caesar, aims to seize power of Rome by justifying his past actions (his murder of Caesar) and gaining the support of the Roman people. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus uses the rhetoric techniques of pathos, logos, and ethos to attempt to persuade the audience that his murder of Caesar was not traitorous; additionally, he seeks the crowd’s support for his leadership of Rome. Brutus utilizes the rhetorical appeal of ethos, as defined by the greek philosopher Aristotle, to persuade the audience of his credibility, when declaring that he killed Caesar for Rome. During the funeral speech, Brutus explains why he killed Caesar by proclaiming “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”

In Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", rhetorical devices are used when Brutus and Antony express their statements throughout the play. Brutus is one of the conspirators who fears Caesar for having too much power over Rome and its citizens. As a result, he assassinates Caesar. In comparison, Marc Antony is a close and loyal friend to Caesar who persuades the people of Rome against conspirators for killing Caesar. After Caesar’s death, the Conspirators make a visit to Rome and explain why they killed Caesar. Brutus appeals to Logos, to justify his actions at Caesar’s funeral, with the intentions to free Rome from Caesar's ambition. Antony appeals to pathos, to persuade the feelings of the audience and seek justice upon the Conspirators, and to reveal that Brutus and the others unjustly killed Caesar.

He uses logos and pathos in remarks, such as when he asks the audience that if they loved Caesar once, for good reason, why they are not mourning them now. Just like Brutus, Antony is now trying to guilt trip the audience, through another point of view. He adds that Brutus’s claims that Caesar was ambitious were untrue, using logical examples such as his refusal of the crown, that he was not. All while disproving Brutus’s ideas, he mocks him as well by sarcastically adding to his statements that, “but of course this could not be true, be cause Brutus said it wasn’t, and he was an honorable man…” in order to lessen his credibility in the eyes of the audience. He also praises Caesar throughout with testimonies like “he was my friend, faithful and just to me…” and says that men (indirectly pointed towards Brutus) have become brutish beasts, a metaphor that is meant to make the audience agree because they likely don’t consider themselves

Brutus attempts to use pathos in his speech, but it is less effective than Antony’s. He asserts, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him. There is tears for his love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition.” Brutus empathizes his emotion of sorrow for his part in the assassination of Caesar and his pure unconditional love for him. The use of pathos is less convincing than in Antony’s because Brutus displays his emotions on Caesar's death rather than manipulating the audience's emotions. By revealing his strong emotions and his feelings, he disables the ability to sway the emotions of the audience because they cannot develop their own emotions. This prevents Brutus to from altering the crowd moods and therefore he is less effective

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a Shakespeare play written around 1599. Shakespeare wrote the tragedy based on the real-life story of the Roman history. In act three, the author concentrates on Marc Antony’s funeral oration and the ideal concepts in the brutal murder which occurs in the society. In the same chapter, Brutus dominates the play as the title character and promotes the central psychological drama. Furthermore, the funeral oration focuses on the struggle of Antony as he strives to meet the conflicting demand ranging from honor, friendship, and patriotism. In his speech, Antony highlights how Brutus conspires with other people to kill Caesar who is about to be crown as a Roman leader. Similarly, Antony discredits Brutus’ speech to the audience to convince them that killing of Caesar is for the benefit of Rome. On the contrary, Antony makes a rhetorical speech but still able to convince the public opinion against the assassins. The paper analyzes the rhetorical value and effectiveness of Antony’s oration regarding the death of Caesar.

Marcus Brutus is the first to speak at Caesar’s funeral. He tries (and succeeds, though only temporarily) to convince the people of Rome that he had good intentions when he murdered Caesar. Throughout his speech, he uses the rhetorical device, logos, to persuade the Roman Citizens. He lists reasons such as Caesar’s ambition. Due to Caesar’s ambition, Brutus argues that Caesar would have become a tyrant who would have enslaved the people of Rome, therefore he needed to be eliminated. Pathos comes into play as Brutus states, “I weep for him” and again when he says,