Julius Caesar Should Have All The Power

As you know, Julius Caesar has recently been assassinated. Ever since then our great nation has been spiraling out of control. There is no structure to our government. Our republic is not working. We desperately need something new, a democracy. But in order for this to work, we need principles, we need a format. What we need is a limited government, a rule of law, a due process, majority rule and minority rights, along with civic duties. I will explain each principle. This new government will make sure that every citizen, will have their voice heard.

“Veni, vidi, vici” (I came, I saw, I conquered) (Source1). This Julius Caesar quote can be used to describe his rise to power in the Roman Republic and destruction of it in the process. Caesar was an extremely influential, yet controversial figure in Rome’s history. He had all the power any Roman could dream of but he abused it. Julius Caesar was a destroyer of the Roman Republic because his arrogance made the government benefit only him, his ruthlessness endangered others, and he undermined the authority of the Roman Senate.

"Do not imagine that the good you intend will balance the evil you perform. "-Norman Macdonald. In the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Antony begins playing a larger role after his death. Thi has caused debate about whether he was a concerned friend of Caesar or whether he was a political power seeker.

As Julius Caesar gained political power and popularity as the governor of the Roman province of Gaul, his growing status made him a major threat to the Roman Senate and the current leader of the Roman Republic, Pompey. They offered him a choice, to resign his command and disband his army or to be declared an “enemy of the state.” In the face of these unfavorable circumstances, Caesar made one of the most pivotal decisions in ancient history. In January 49 B.C.E., Julius Caesar led his troops across the Rubicon, disregarding the Senate’s rule and kick-starting the Roman Civil War that would change the state of Rome forever. In Plutarch’s, “Caesar” in Roman Lives, Suetonius’s, Lives of the Caesars, and Julius Caesar’s, The Civil Wars, each

When asked about the subject of human nature, most would not be able to describe how people naturally tend to be, because the subject is too vague; plus, individuals all think of themselves as unique and different. Although, are humans all similar when it comes to having or dealing with excessive power? One may argue that if they were to obtain a ton of power, that they would not change. This will seem as false because as seen throughout human history and as interpreted in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, humans tend to deal with excessive power; with arrogance, selfishness, and increase in desire for power.

Suetonius and Plutarch’s works describe Julius Caesar’s life through his rulership and his triumphs that occurred. According to Suetonius and Plutarch’s evidence they show that Caesar was a great leader, who was faithful to Rome and her people until the day he died. They have many pieces of evidence they present to show why Caesar was a fearless and valiant leader. Suetonius and Plutarch’s evidence show that Caesar was a hero of Rome, who was wrongly assassinated by the senate, who were jealous of his popularity with the people of Rome and they felt like he wielded too much power for a consul. Suetonius and Plutarch also show how his people loved him, how he loved the people, how he loved Rome, and how he was faithful to Rome until death.

Imagine if only one person had all the power in the world. That would be a bad place, wouldn’t it? That one person that has all the control can do bad things without having to ask anyone. For instance, Julius Caesar was assassinated because others believed that he had too much power. They believed this because he used his power in a wrong way. So, if power was split among many different people equally, it will ensure that whoever has the power uses it safely and wisely.

There were many reasons for people to kill Caesar but few were used. Their reasons can be seen as self evident when 33 senators kill a prospective strongman dictator and then devolve into civil war. As logical or moral the arguments are they are at least somewhat diverse if not particularly well phrased.

Julius Caesar: this name holds the identity of a powerful Roman leader, with influence over people of the years shortly before Jesus. Caesar lived from 100 BC to his assassination in 44 BC. After victory in battle, Caesar’s power continued to sprout and receiving a crown to be named King became a possibility, causing some to develop fear towards Caesar. Some like his friend Brutus, a public figure in the nation, feared what might come from Caesar if he promoted to king. This fear created a war within Brutus’ spirit: would his love for Rome cause him to fall against his love for Caesar? Brutus knew decided for himself that reigning power would alter Caesar, and not for good.

On March 15 or the Ides of March Julius Caesar, Rome’s best leader in centuries, was assassinated. The attack took place in the center of Pompey’s theatre, Pompey was the ruler Caesar overpowered to become the leader of Rome.

The Dangers of Power Abraham Lincoln once stated “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” A key term Lincoln uses in his statement is character, which means respectable and ethical qualities. In addition, Lincoln’s statement includes the term power which is defined as possession or control over others. Taken as a whole, Lincoln means that some people can overcome hardships but authority and power can cause their honor and ethics to change. Moreover, Lincoln implies in his statement that it is easy for the powerless to be gentle, however, power can alter one’s honor and morals.

Julius Caesar was a man that ended the rough time period in Rome. He was in Egypt and Asia before he returned to Rome to rule for his people. When he came to power, these were some of the rules that he set,

Power is a natural desire for humans. It is what structures society, makes the world turn, and to get more of it, people will do almost anything. Yet society often follows whoever is in power without a second thought. Because the Romans follow whoever is in power without considering that person’s morals and ideals, they are responsible for the anarchy that ensues after Caesar’s death.

Act Three, Scene One of William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is infamously known to be the scene in which Caesar is stabbed by the many conspirators of the senate against him. This scene must always be performed in a fashion that is as powerful and compelling as the original text. The 1953 film, Julius Caesar, accomplishes this hard to do task in the scene depicting Julius Caesar's death as a whole. The dramatic music and camera techniques of the film assist the strong casting. Louis Calhern, as Julius Caesar, and the superb cast behind him create a fascinating performance in the notorious death scene of Julius Caesar.

Cassius, As a young man he studied philosophy in Greece and was known for his opposition against despotism. Gaius Cassius, in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, reflects the hopes, fears and the expectations of the Ancient Greek Culture because he is easily threatened like the Greeks.