preview

Jung-Typology Personality Assessment

Decent Essays

Reflection on the Jung-Typology Personality Assessment and DISC Leadership Assessment
While both the Jung-Typology and the DISC’s assessment varies, mostly the characteristics it read were seemingly similar. Both tests seem to find my personality to be more introverted and cautious than extroverted and daring. I believe that these tests are mostly accurate, but have some flaws intertwined within.
Through the Jung-Typology assessment, my results were not surprising and mostly accurate. My results came back as ISFJ, meaning I am more introverted than extroverted, more sensing than intuitive, more feeling than sensing, and more judging than perceiving. D. Kiersey mentions that ISFJ’s are “protectors”, this is a valid statement as I feel that often times I think about everyone else before …show more content…

The DISC assessment, similar to the Jung-Typology, I felt was not as accurate and I found more to disagree with. The DISC was more in depth, I thought. The DISC said that I was less decisive, moderately interactive, highly stable, and extremely cautious. Once again the DISC assessment also said I would prefer a stable work environment, and I still disagree with that one.
However, I believe it was spot-on when it says that I like to analyze a situation before I act on a decision and I am normally the quiet person in a heated debate. In the interactive category, I was almost directly in the middle. However, the only true thing in this category is the fact that I prefer to work alone, the rest were close, but I felt that they were not as explicit at the Jung-
Typology. For the stability category, I had a pretty high score, which was not very surprising to me. This category was pretty accurate, saying that I am patient with a wide variety of people and that I’m not great at letting things go. The cautious category was the highest score (99). This was almost 100% accurate based on my personality. The only flaw I found was that it said I have

Get Access