Jung Typology Test

When taking the Jung typology test the profile I received was INFJ. In this profile, “I” stands for introvert. What this means is that I tend to be more introverted, rather than extraverted. An example of this is, a friend of mine was having a party and asked me to go. Since it was my friend’s birthday I decided to go. When I got to the party I realized that I wouldn’t be able to talk to her very much because of all the people there. I spent most of the night being very quiet and not starting up any conversations. Whenever someone started talking to me, I would keep the conversation going of course. After about an hour of uncomfortable socializing I decided to step out on her back porch for some peace and quiet. I often find that when I am

The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test provided me with unexpected results. The test showed me that I am more of an extravert over introvert, I have a “slight preference of sensing over intuition”, I have “no preference of thinking over feeling”, and I have “slight preference of judging over perceiving.” These results surprised me slightly while also telling me things I already expected.

As requested, I took the Jung Typology Assessment. The results revealed my personality to be ISFJ (Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging). The first characteristic listed is the desires to serve others. An ISFJ is loyal, sometimes taken for granted, bad at delegating, but produces superior quality work. Methodical, accurate, and possess an excellent memory are more characteristics of the ISFJ personality type. They work well in a small group and make reliable coworkers; however, they tend to be awkward in a supervisory capacity. Not only is an ISFJ a great employee but they are extremely family oriented and dedicated to their intimate group of friends. If a friend or family member is in need of emotional support an ISFJ is by their side without

According to the Jung Typology Test, my four letter personality type is ISFJ. I was not surprised with my results at all and found them to be very accurate and represent me as a person. As an introvert, “I often prefer doing things alone or with one or two people (CITE). As a student, being an introvert is a disadvantage for me because I do not work well with large study groups and instead rather lock myself in a room and study alone. With sensing, “I learn best when I see how to use what I’m learning” (CITE) and only complete things using what I know from experience. By only using my experience when completing assignments or school work hinders my experience as a student by limiting my ability to learn new material. Through feeling, I tend

Hello, I’m Joshua Dudley and the results I got for my Jung Typology Test was on point for the kind of person I am. In the Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test my letters were ENFJ. ENFJs are the benevolent 'pedagogues' of humanity. They have tremendous charisma by which many are drawn into their nurturant tutelage and/or grand schemes. Many ENFJs have tremendous power to manipulate others with their phenomenal interpersonal skills and unique salesmanship (butt). All of the letters have different meanings. (E)- Extravert (34%), (N)- iNtuitive (9%), (F)- Feeling (19%), and (J)- Judging (28%) and these for letters ENFJ make up the type of person I am. I also had to find a two letter temperament for my personality. The two Letters I think that fit me is (NF)- “The Idealists” which my primary

The Jung Personality Test, was a test, trying to figure out about what kind of person I am. The test had many different questions it was asking and I would answer them truthfully. Through this test, I learned I was extroverted, sensitive, a thinker/feeler and perceiving.

In my research on the reliability and validity of the Jung Typology Test, I found that the Jung Typology Test has been validated on a test sample of 1000 individuals, ranging in ages from 18 to 70 (Humanmetrics, 2016). The validity statement did not provide information on the gender or ethnicity of the individual respondents, which could affect the test validity. The majority of the reliability correlation coefficients (including Test-Retest and Split-Half) are over .70, indicating an average to good level. In regards to type frequency, ISFJ (Introverted, Sensing, Feeling, Judging) held the highest estimate at 13.8% and INFJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Judging) was the lowest at 1.5%—it is considered among the rarest types in the general

Recently, I have taken the Jung typology personality test. It showed that I was ISTJ. This acronym stands for introvert, sensing, thinking, and judging. I feel as though the results were thoroughly correct. Introvert perfectly explains the type of person I have been throughout my life. I have always liked working by myself instead of in groups and I have very few close relationships with people. The sensing category was also true of my character because i tend to notice small details and I am a very practical, realistic type of person. As far as the thinking category, I always judge things rationally and

The online Jung Typology Test was a very interesting exercise. The test pointed out certain things about my personality type that I will be examining in the course of this class. It may give me some important insights into my personal and professional decisions about family, career and life. I have worked in municipal government for over 38 years. I have done budgets, human resources, and day to day supervision of several city departments. The majority of that time has been within management of two major international airports. In that time I managed employees, and I was managed by executive level leadership. Employee supervision was a great learning experience. I supervised employees who came to work to do their jobs, and other subordinates

Jung typology test has become something that organizations have been using in order to assist with determining the different personality types where individuals are concerned. While this is not the first time I have engaged in this kind of personality assessment, there is a welcomed refreshment to be reminded about who I am. The results from the human-metrics typology test by Jung revealed that I am the INTJ type. In breaking down the letters and the categories this is the result.

My Jungian Typology is INFP. INFP means that I am an introvert, intuitive, feeling, and perceiving. Introvert means that I have a source of energy mainly in my own internal world. Intuitive means that I believe the information that I receive from the internal or imaginative world. Feeling means that I exercise my emotions while processing information. Perceiving means that I am inclined to improvise and explore alternative options. This just means that I am extra shy and to myself than others might be. Also that I receive information from myself. I use my emotions in my learning. I improvise in my work. I feel like this fits me extremely well.

One of the two self-assessment test that I’ve taken is the “Jung Typology test”, and it gives me my results back about my personalities. Those results are ESEP (Extraverted, Sensing, Feeling, Perceiving) and these results are very accurate, because most of the time I’m very apprehensive when it comes to reality that is superficial through senses. By feelings, decision-making in concentration of individual beings, is supplementary to sensing. By thinking, prepare to pursue authorization of the unassailability of problematical making decisions. These types are the key for easy communication such as, coming up with trusting relationships and having a group of connections. The second test that I’ve taken was the Interest Profiler, and my results came out to be Social and Investigative. Social is being a helper, enjoy helping people, working in groups with others, and have verbal and communication skills come naturally. Investigative is being a thinker, enjoy learning, and prefer working on my own pace. These results are accurate, because even though I like working

I found this paper to be very insightful. My personality type showed me to be a person that is an ISFJ, an introverted, sensing, feeling and also judgmental person. I agreed with the findings and research of this personality type except for the judgmental aspect. After learning about my own personality I explored some of the components of personalities.

I was very happy to have been given the opportunity to take these self-assessment tests. I always had an idea as far as what my personality is defined as, but it’s interesting to see where my strengths and weaknesses are. With the Jungian Typology test I scored 59% Introvert, 34% Sensing, 19% Thinking, and 31% Judging. After receiving this score and reading how each is defined, none of this surprised me. Sharing the results with my mother, her response was, “No surprise there!” I have always tried having some understanding of my personality in hopes of finding the right career path for me. I must admit that this has opened my eyes to how detail oriented and focused I can be, especially if it’s something I care about. This can be both good

Jung. The test constructed by Myers (1962). Purpose of this test is determining which psychological functions are used by individual to understand, perceive the world. In the test, there four dimensions with two opposite polars; Introversion - Extraversion (EI), Sensation - Intuition (SN), Thinking - Feeling (TF) and Judging - Perceiving (JP). JP dimension measures individual's way of dealing with outer world. EI, SN and TF dimensions of the test are independent from each other but JP dimension, which is not a part of theory of Jung's typology, is related to SN and TF dimensions. ( Sticker & Ross, 1963). When the results from each dimension summed up, MBTI determines type of the individual. Also series of studies are conducted in order to identify whether MBTI is supporting the important factors Jungian typology or not. This studies show us except a few results there are no significant support for the factors ( e.g. stability of attitudes and functions) (Sticker & Ross, 1964).