Essay On Jury Nullification

Jury Nullification- Is when a jury reaches a verdict that is opposing to that of all the evidence presented.

The news is riddled with salacious stories about the criminal activities across the nation. It can seem like these events are taking place in another world, very far from your own. But when you find yourself being charged with a criminal act, the situation hits much closer to home, literally. There is a great amount of detail and skill involved in successfully telling your side of the story to the judge and the jury. Though some defendants choose to represent themselves at trial, this is never recommended! Your defense attorney should provide the court with a biased version of your story, meaning they should present you in a good light, emphasize the events that will lessen the chances of you being found guilty, and make the jury see you as someone who is innocent.

The role of the jury is to decide whether or not the accused is guilty or not. They have the responsibility of deciding if the relevant facts of the trials are true. The jury consist of 12 members of the public. One juror is selected as a foreman by the jury before the case starts. They then act as an informal chairperson and spokesman for the jury.

making them invisible in this whole process. A jury cannot truly understand the extent of the damage done if a victim, or victim’s family member/loved one, cannot explain it to them (Davis). In every state there was an absence of laws that required the victim or victim’s family to be keep properly and timely updated about the case. For example, if the offender was released on bail, if charges were changed or dropped, if there were any parole hearings, etc., the victim was usually not being notified of these changes, and if they were notified, it was after a significant amount of times passed. Which aids in the reasoning behind making it under law that the victim is to be notified in a timely manner (Davis). These undeserving people who become

The use of a jury is the traditional method within the common law for deciding the facts in any dispute between parties. The role of a jury is to determine question of fact. The jury is in a powerful method because ultimately, it determines whether a person is guilty or innocent. In civil cases, the main function of the jury is to find the facts having regard to the evidence, and assess damages. The number of jurors used in a civil trial is less than that used in a criminal trial. Another important difference is that the verdict does not have to be unanimous, meaning that a judge will accept a majority decision of a civil jury.

A venire is the selected jury panel which has to be established prior to systematically setting forth in the sixth amendment. Jury selection has evolved beyond seeking impartial, unbiased jurors. During the voir dire process, both sides also attempt to exclude jurors who may be detrimental to their case and to retain those who may be beneficial. Jury selection experts have created a science of what to ask and look for during this process, leading to justifiable inquiries about whether it truly is about only impartiality. Although each side has a certain number of peremptory challenges they may assert to remove a potential juror for any reason whatsoever, the use of such peremptory dismissals to create a jury unfairly composed of a group likely

First, jury nullification fulfills the exact intention of a trial by jury, through allowing a cross-section of society to weigh all matters presented to them and determine if an action

In the United States, prenatal substance use continues to be a widespread problem with the addictive substances used during pregnancy; the risk factors, and the long-term effects a baby can have. When a pregnant woman uses drugs, she and her unborn child face serious health problems. Long-term effects of drugs on babies can include behavioral problems as they grow older. They can also be born addicted to the drugs used to treat the mother’s addiction. The task at hand is to make sure that we view all drugs of abuse through a common lens, regardless of legal status, so that their impact on child outcome can be adequately assessed leading to appropriate policy

Over the past years, drugs have been taking over more lives than we could have imagined. It seems that drugs have become more “popular”, even though they have been around us our whole lives. Kids starting at age 11 are now doing drugs, which is pretty upsetting knowing your little brother could be doing drugs without you even knowing. A more upsetting topic is babies being born addicted to drugs. A study has shown in 2004 seven babies in every 1000 were born addicted to drugs, by 2013 27 in every 1000 babies have been born addicted (Staufenberg, J. (2015, September 7). Huge increase in babies born addicted to drugs in US. Retrieved October 1, 2015.). I know it’s hard, thinking how such precious little humans can be born suffering from withdrawal. Poor babies have to suffer due to their mother’s mistake, ever wonder how baby withdrawal can stop? A topic that has a lot of controversy around it is, should all pregnant women be drug tested? My opinion before I survey 100 people is, I believe they should be drug tested in order to protect the baby. In fact Tennessee has made a law to arrest mother who give birth to drug addicted babies. The legislation gives moms of babies who are born dependent on drugs two choices: Face a misdemeanor charge or go to drug court where they will be put through an 18-month treatment program. (Tenn. Moms Can Now Be Arrested for 'drug Babies ' | HLNtv.com." HLNtv.com. 1 May 2014. Web. 12 Oct. 2015.) The effects of babies born to drugs could be

Conor McKinley noticed the jurors arriving back into their box, each taking their designated seat. However, something got his attention when he observed one obviously straight Juror sitting with a stain of cum on his pants.

In the United States of America, the criminal justice system is based on the adversarial system or common law system. An adversarial trial allows the accused or defendant to be given a fair chance to prove his or her innocence. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the defendant is to be given a fair chance to oppose the prosecution, have witnesses to help with his or her defense, face and question the complainant, and for his or her case to be heard by a group of people who are unbiased and impartial. This group is known as the trial jury.

In the early 1980s, with the rising abuse of “crack-cocaine” and major concerns about it’s effect on children exposed in utero, there was a big push to put legislation in place regarding reporting of illegal drug use during pregnancy, considering it as a form of child abuse (Behnke et al., 2013). The Keeping Children and Families Safe Act was passed in 2003, requiring health care providers to notify Child Protective Services of any infant experiencing drug withdrawal or recognized to be affected by illegal drugs at birth. The effects of maternal alcohol and tobacco use on

I am in receipt of your Jury Summons letter requesting that I attend Courtroom #3 on August 1, 2018 for jury selection. Although, I realize that being a juror is a civic responsibility, I am writing to respectfully request that I be excused from jury selection at this time, for the following reasons:

Because jurors are selected at random from different locations, the jury system allows for more types of citizens to get involved in the justice/political process of their communities and creates a representative justice system. There also is a strong correlation among past jurors and increased voting percentage, indicating that the experience likely prompted them to feel more connected with their government. The jury experience is also is an educational tool for the citizens, who learn more about how the justice system works throughout the entire process.

The jury is the finder of fact, and they are placed in a position that is responsible for deciding the truth to the story in the courtroom. When the jury returns a verdict of “Not Guilty” even though the defendant is guilty of the crime that they committed is called jury nullification. This is where the fate is in the jury’s hands, and the jury believes that a law that the defendant was charged with is either immoral or the law was wrongly applied to the defendant, so the jury effectively nullifies the verdict. The power to nullify a verdict is clearly given to the jurors and once a jury returns a verdict of “Not Guilty.” The verdict that the jury rendered cannot be changed or questioned by the courts, and there cannot be a retrial under the