Jury Strengths And Weaknesses

A jury is a person who is un-qualified and not paid who is selected at random to participate in the court hearing. To be

These statements display that the 8th Juror, as an individual, know exactly what he has to do as a jury member and is also honest, moral and trustworthy enough to lead the other jurors. For that reason, we observer the 8th Juror stepping forward to become a ‘saviour’ of the jury system.

The role of the jury in criminal

Juries exists in the criminal trial to listen to the case presented to them and, as a third, non-bias party, decide beyond reasonable doubt if the accused is guilty. For the use of a trial by juror to be effective, no bias should exists in the jurors judgments, the jurors should understand clearly their role and key legal terms, and the jury system should represent the communities standards and views whilst upholding the rights of the accused and society and remain cost and time effective.

The first phase of a criminal jury trial is focused on selecting specific jurors, which is accomplished through a process referred to as 'voir dire' which is a screening of potential jurors. In the criminal trial involving an offense categorized as a felony "12 jurors and up to six alternate jurors may be chosen." (3rd Judicial District, ) Voir dire of the jury involves the prosecuting and defense attorneys questioning the potential jurors and

A jury trial is made up of twelve citizens of the community who have been randomly selected to serve on the jury. The jury had been given the authority to judge the facts of the case, and them apply the law that was given by the judge to those facts, and render a verdict of guilty or not guilty.

For this criteria I will be producing a written evaluation of the effectiveness of magistrates and juries in the administration of justice in the English legal system.

Have you ever been to a trial or have you seen a trial on the television? Have you ever saw that group of people that were sitting in a box? Or have you ever heard someone say they have to go do jury duty? You may wondered what jury duty is. Well jury duty is service as a member of a jury in a court of law. You may say well what is a jury? A jury is a body of people sworn to give to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. In this paper we will talk about three counties and how their jury system goes. And if they don’t have one we will talk about what they do for their judicial system. Jury system makes the court’s trial easier and fair.

It is recognised that Australia’s System of decision making in the court is in need of reform, if the

Justice Evatt delivered a paper to the Australian Legal Convention which entitled “The Jury System in Australia” in 1936 . Justice Evatt’s thesis of Jury trials was that “in modern day society the jury system is regarded as an essential feature of real democracy”. Jury trials in the nineteenth century were found way before in four colonies Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia . When Trial by Judge alone was first introduced in South Australian thirty eight were held in the Supreme Court between 1989 and 1993, meaning all annual percentage of all criminal trials in the court ranged between 3.9% and 8.9% . The Juries Act SA 1927 was amended many times making some major changes. In 1966, women were introduced in the South Australian Jury system as only men were capable of serving on Juries. An increase to the number of jurors available to contribute in a criminal trial was amended in 2004 . It now states in the Juries Act 1927 under section 6A that if court agrees there are good reasons to add additional jurors of 2 or 3 it can be empanelled for a criminal trial .

The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial This assignment focuses on how a jury is selected and its role in a

You have been charged with an either way offence this means that you will get the choice as to whether you trial your case at the Magistrates or Crown Court. In this report I will evaluate the effectiveness of lay people presenting their advantages and disadvantages. I will also evaluate the jury system. As I have explained either way offences can either be very serious or very minor, which is why they are tried at the Crown Court or Magistrates’.

As these lists have grown the number of cases that are tried by a jury

It could be said that there are many advantages to having a jury in the English legal system and it must be considered that li is the English legal system has adopted juries into their judiciary system for over 1000 years therefore it must be considered that it must have weighty benefits. It could be said that public participation is one of the main focal point for having a jury in the English legal system. A jury allows ordinary people to participate in the administration of

The system of trial by jury has changed considerably since it was first introduced into thirteenth century England to replace the old system of trial by physical ordeal. In recent years, there has been an intense debate about whether the jury system should be further changed or even abolished altogether. Criticism of trial by jury often arises after a decision in a particular controversial case, in a climate where rational discussion about the general merits of the system is unlikely to occur. In such circumstances, logical arguments are often reduced to simple slogans for the media. The aim of this paper is not to argue the case one way or the other, but simply to give some structure to the arguments for and against the jury system and to