Just City Essay Analysis

Drinking age is not a strange phrase in our lives. Every time when we go to club or buy some liquor, we have to show our photo ID to prove that we have already 21 and we are legal to drink wine. I think this is a really good method to control drinking problem. Before I read these two articles which are “The 21-Year-Old Drinking Age: I Voted for it, It Doesn’t Work” by Dr. Morris E. Chafetz and “The Drinking Age of 21 Saves Lives” by Toben F. Nelson and Traci L. Toomey, I only felt that when people grow up they will have self-control to hold their desire for drinking and could decide whether it is appropriate to drink at that moment. I didn’t collect any data or information to support my opinion,

Sanneh states, “A gentrification story often unspools as a morality play, with bohemians playing a central if ambiguous part: their arrival can signal that a neighborhood is undergoing gentrification, but so can their departure, as rising rents increasingly bring economic stratification” (Sanneh). This demonstrate gentrification is a social justice issue because it leads to economic stratification which refers to the grouping of people according to differences in income, occupation, power, privilege, manner of living, region where they live, age, gender or race. Martin Luther King defines injustice as, “any law that degrades human personality is unjust” (MLK 15). Many sociologists have researched how people, as they move from villages to cities, lose communal bonds and moral codes, which are essential to one’s psychological well-being. Many inner-city neighborhoods now constitute similarly vibrant communities, and leaving them can have profoundly negative consequences. To prevent such social dislocation, we need to lessen the incentives that are driving gentrification. We should increase the stock of housing, offer microcredit in poor neighborhoods, and provide legal protection against unscrupulous banks and real-estate agents. Otherwise, gentrification will continue to drive people from the places where they have

Presently, low-income occupiers are in deeper poverty because of the dislodgment caused by gentrification. Furthermore, a lack of resources plagues low-incomes families and forces them into shelters. Current actions taken by city officials are a step in the right direction. Nevertheless, by including more voices in urbanization of cities in the future, the advancement of cities can include all members rather than just the wealthy.

Task #1 : Analyse the impacts of at least two urban dynamics operating in a large city of the developed world.

New York City is the largest city in the United States with a population of more than 8 million people (NYC Planning, 2017). The city has been facing serious challenges since 2001, especially with the recession in 2008. Tough problems ranging from poverty, increased immigration, high crime, increase in drug activities, air and water pollution, and high population density, and so many more. These are just some of the many problems that have threatened the quality of life for New Yorkers. This paper seeks to examine three tough challenges; poverty, air and water pollution, and population density, which have faced the city of New York as well as pointing some possible solutions to these problems.

Cities are generators of economic life and source of changes in the world. Thereby, Jane Jacobs in her book The Death and Life of Great American Cities puts into relief the role of cities on the social and economic levels, while denouncing the disastrous consequences of urban renewal programs. To that extent, in chapters 2 and 3, she discusses "The Uses of Sidewalks”, arguing that over all people need safety and trust in their city. Therefore, first she claims the necessity of keeping streets and sidewalks safe because they are the “vital organs” of cities (29). Secondly, she argues that the functioning of cities should be organized in order to foster human interaction in which “casual public

In the ideal city, there is no value to personal freedom. Everyone is sorted into a specific class by the state without regard to what they would prefer. Considerations of the state outweigh any consideration of the self.

You would be surprised at the number of cities all over the world that experience gentrification, albeit gentrification follows the trend of taking place in urban areas. “Until about 2005, most planners and urban theorists regarded gentrification as a local issue. It was first described by Ruth Glass as a neighborhood-scale process of urban transformation. However, as whole cities and whole counties have become gentrified, the scale of the phenomenon now challenges the original concept (“Gentrification: now global! | UrbanPolicy.net”, 2018).” We can see examples of gentrification happening in places all over the globe, for example in places, Sydney, Vancouver, Amsterdam, and Johannesburg just to name a few. Yet as gentrification happens across the globe one thing remains the same there always seems to be an underlying political-economic-social cause of the change. One can begin to recognize this as a stark and undeniable truth when you begin to compare and contract cities miles apart or across the entire globe from each other. Places that you would never even think of being in the juxtaposition of one another. While there is no denying that gentrification has many fruitful gains the questions is who reaps the rewards is it just a select few or does the vast majority benefit? Another concern worth bringing up is the issue of sustainability. How does a

This method of urban planning initially produced an appealing impression from me. As I expanded my knowledge on this urban-planning trend, I realized there were many considerations to be taken in order to obtain a fair view. Growing up and living in Westchester County, New York for the majority of my life, the city was only a 40-minute drive from my hometown. New York City always intrigued me and I always had dreams of living in Manhattan or Brooklyn. I was fascinated by the strong economic reputation of the city and its increasingly beautiful boroughs. Similar to the Downtown Brooklyn Council’s intention of improving market attractions (“Downtown Brooklyn Development Plan”, 2016), the outcome of all these redevelopment plans influenced my attraction towards the city. I do believe that gentrification does make an area more appealing for others. Whenever I visit the city, the huge skyscrapers and variety of different businesses mesmerize me, however, I can’t help but feel a sense of invasion to another’s property. Knowing that a prevalent community of diverse cultures was kicked out for a small percentage of citizens who can actually afford to live here is unethical in my opinion (Yee, 2015). Even though I still plan on living in the city after I graduate, I don’t believe the little amount of consideration taken towards the original residents affected by gentrification is morally

Gentrification has been a controversial issue both in urban planning and politics primarily due to the displacement of poor people by the rich folks (Shaw & Hagemans, 2015). Many individuals have viewed gentrification as an illegal act that should be avoided at all costs. On the other hand, another group of people believe that gentrification is the way forward to promoting growth and development. With such contrasting ideas, this paper is going to take a look at gentrification from a positive and negative perspective, its effects, and how it can be prevented or contained. Apart from this, the paper will also address the following questions.

‘City Limits' analyzed Sydney and the other rest of the big cities, in Australia, through evidence based on statistics, case studies, and stories of individuals and families who experience their life in the city today. The authors describe that the city has been associated with opportunities, freedom, and social connection, which the pattern is shifted and infected by the disease of contested space and the absence of social connection. Consequently, the cities are segregating the public societies – between the status of economic, social, physical, and to be included or excluded in the public space.

Part two of Death and Life explains several conditions for city diversity based on the observations of different American cities and discusses in depth the four factors that Jacobs believe are critical for the development of a city. The basis for generating diversity lies in these conditions, and cannot be secludedly achieved by planning and designing. This part lays out the foundation and is the basis for the rest of the book. It shows urban planning and many possible remedies for creating equal diversity, and studies why these are not applied and the effects of it not being so.

The process of people moving into cities, which is called urbanisation, was happening around the world in past decades. It causes cities to have more labourers and resources than before. This makes a big contribution to the social development of cities. Thanks to these social developments, public services are becoming better in these areas. Citizens can enjoy a better life by access these public services such as better medical care, more education resources and well-built transport. It means an equitable society can be created. An equitable society means citizens can have more opportunities to access social resources and to live a better life. This essay will argue that

Designing a city from scratch is a remarkable thought experiment but ultimately fails at implementation because we always approach it from the perspective of “how can we create a new city that solves problems of existing cities.” It’s less a process driven by design and more by critique. Urban living has paved its way into modern society, yet the vision for a city has changed over time. Large settlements need planning to grow; yet differences in minds is what leads to the modifications of a city, in return makes a city so unique. Alterations in opinions are what thrives urban life, still these differences are what skews the view of how others see a city compared to myself. They say the eye of the beholder deems beauty; this could explain

“Life is not just about the good things or just about the bad things. It is both. It all depends on where you focus your attention.” Similarly, this quote taken from author Anne-Marie Aguilar emphasizes this paper’s argument that the concept of a smart city has positive, but also negative impacts, such as generating class division and social inequality. However, because attention is directed towards the positive effects, this often leads one to overlook the primarily negative influence of this phenomenon. To start with, we define a smart city "as a city in which ICT is merged with traditional infrastructures, coordinated and integrated using new digital technologies”, (Batty, 2012). A real world example of this would be India, where its “government has announced their ‘Smart Cities Mission’” ("2nd smart cities," 2015). Eventually this category of cities will lead to social inequality and exclusion, as companies, and cities focus on those who can pay to generate profits, while ignore the social benefit of the predominant lower class citizens of India. And finally, this exclusion, will add to the digital divide in India as a result of the unequal access to modern information, communication and technology, something a smart city revolves around. Furthermore a smart city’s focus is “to enable more efficient forms of urban management and service delivery”; however, this city leads to more than just that (Smith, 2015). Clearly, the model of a smart city holds factors which create