Justice : Attainable Or Just Another Illusion?

            A misrepresentation is a statement made that is not unified with the truth. There are two categories that misrepresentation can fall under: either innocent or fraudulent. When a misrepresentation is innocent it was made not intentionally to deceive the other party. A fraudulent misrepresentation is made with the intent to deceive with knowledge that it is false. Tommy wants to pursue legal action against Royal 16 Theater on the basis that they conducted fraudulent misrepresentation.

A misrepresentation is a statement or a claim made by one to another that can either be misleading or false. This can happen not only is written contracts or contracts but also verbally, it can be as simple as when a person is talking to another and has provided them with information that is incorrect. For a business it is illegal or unlawful to be involved or make any statements in matters that can be mislead or misinformed or is likely to be mislead or misinformed to its customers or other businesses. The following can be classified as being misleading, the failure to disclose relevant information, predictions, opinions and promises. The conducts for the misleading or miss informing whether by action or statement includes advertising, any form of statements, promotions, quotations and by any representation made by a person.2 A form of misleading information or deceptiveness can be in the form

The United States of America is a powerful nation built upon laws and justice; however, without these laws, the nation would fall apart and chaos would result. For example, it is crucial for citizens to respect the court’s decisions in public trials. Unfortunately, no system is flawless and some guilty people are sent free; however, the guilt those people feel is justice itself. Although some people may argue immoral people do not feel guilt, society’s reception of these immoral people serves as justice. Therefore, citizens of the United States of America should not have the right to take justice into their own hands.

A question that pervades every modern culture when it comes to their system of justice is whether, “Is our justice based on an inalienable plane that cannot be changed by humans or nature?” That is to say, is justice universal and never changing? For over two millennia since civilizations have existed, civilizations have conveniently supported their justice system as universal through their religion. Thomas Hobbes will suggest an alternative to this explanation of justice, that justice is not universal among all men, but it takes another element to decide what justice is. This would seem to discount the thought of an universal justice that exists in everyday life. However, what arises is another question that needs to be answered, “Is there universal justice in nature?” Nature being the plane of existence that everyone in this universe exists in. Nature is the stimuli and experiences that all humans and creatures alike encounter in their life. If Hobbes is correct in saying that there is no universal law that dictates how man may live, is there a law of nature that dictates how man may react to his surroundings? When that question is answered, Hobbes then throws another question that builds off of that answer. If there does exist a universal law of justice in nature, then what is just and what is not just? While we may be satisfied in whatever conclusion we draw, Hobbes throws a wrench into our satisfaction by stating that, “just and unjust have no place prior to the

The current political agenda in regards to criminal justice policy in the modern conservative Canadian government is a “tough on crime” approach. This right-wing conservative view on the correctional system is very much similar to that of the United States in how justice should be served. This approach is a very detrimental form of justice, as it only focuses on punishment and has no consideration for utilitarian goals for society to create a greater good for the future. With this right wing conservative approach to corrections, the government appears to have a political agenda to move away from a rehabilitative approach to a more retributivist approach that exemplifies that of just deserts theory. With this type of philosophy, the government ignores the importance of rehabilitation and the impact it has for the future of offenders and society as a whole. This paper will discuss the importance of rehabilitation model in correctional policy and how it can improve the lives of offenders and increase public safety for the long-term. With rehabilitation, it is important to focus on practices and programming that are proven with empirical evidence to actually work and make a difference. It is evident with increasingly high rate of crime, high rates of recidivism, the California three strikes rule, and the “tough on crime” Republican Policy in

Justice is not rigid and unchanging like so many want to believe. For the Ancient Greeks in the 8th century, blood justice is the only way to settle disputes. By the mid-400s BCE, there are glimpses of what will later become a trial by jury in a democratic judicial system. Aeschylus’ plays show a distinct shift from blood justice to a more democratic system. Even Homer, when writing his epic works, seems to hint at a better way to resolve conflict than the “eye for an eye” mentality. The Iliad acts as book ends to the transformation of blood justice to a trial by jury as presented by The Oresteia; and that transformation positively influences how Western culture deals with justice.

What does liberty and justice mean to you? Liberty is the right to act and do things without punishment. Justice is being fair and right. For example a person that lives here in the united states has the freedom to say and do what they want according to the bill of rights, but do we really have liberty and justice?

The very first purpose incorporated into the preamble was that the government is required to establish a sense, and system of justice in the nation. A nation cannot function without the justice system as persons within the nation quickly fall apart due to chaos of crime, and rampant bigotry as people form their own social enclaves. A lack of justice in society will lead to discrimination, which is of course unjust most of the time, this then will lead to resentment of the mistreated which lead to civil unrest at the worst, and lack of economic participation at the least. Both are not beneficial to the nation, and will only lead it to degenerate into a failed state. This was all very relevant back then as the people of the colonies did not like

Americans are marching, protesting, and even risking their own lives to fight for justice. Justice for not only themselves but for their kids, the future of America. But then again, will complete justice ever come during our lifetime? Will justice ever be blind to the color of skin, the amount of wealth, and gender? America is known to be one of the greatest leading country in the world today, but sadly America isn’t great at everything. Denial of rights, discrimination based on sex, violent shootings, continuous protests, and a generation of angry citizens are just few words to describe the situation in the streets of our home. Although many tend to deny and refuse the truth, these types of injustice happens daily in America. It is devastating to see the American society becoming desensitized to these issues that were present from the beginning of the Great American Civilization. It breaks my heart to see the children of this generation suffer from this ongoing misfortune because they too will soon become victims. However, if justice comes, it will be from the new generation, our new generation.

He think that the only way we can truly say justice is good, is only when we take away those rewards of justices, the reputations that people care very much about. Otherwise, we are only appearing to be justice, in the reason of the good consequences, if only there are no rewards, than we can say we are acting justice

Injustice occurs in many situations everyday and can be a burden to anyone. Injustice is most commonly defined as a violation of the rights of others (dictionary.com). Unfortunately injustice and negativity go hand in hand with each other and are very common among today’s society. The qualification of unjust acts is highly debated. Unfair, unaware, and threatening are all adjectives that can be used to further describe injustice.

Pow! Pow! He was suddenly standing by himself in a liquor store with three dead men around him. Two of the men were Black and one was the White store owner. Broken glass and spilled alcohol is splattered across the originally spotless floor behind the register. He was a witness to what happened, but it was suddenly a blur. He knew how it looked and was well aware his skin color would determine his fate if he was seen at the place of this tragedy. Should he run? Call the police? Dazed, confused, and unable to resist his urge, he lifted a bottle of whiskey from the top shelf and stuffed the money from the cash register into his pockets. He was ready to run, then two white men walked into the store. The next

When one hears the word, justice, one would think of the courts and how people are dealt out punishment based on the law. One may also think of several court cases where the outcome may have been unfair or unjust. It is interesting how justice is perceived by people as justice can mean several things to people, like what is true justice? How is a sentence deemed fair? Most people believe that true justice is when a sentence is given to someone and that the sentence chosen is in line with the crime committed by the person who is deemed guilty. However what if there was a person who committed a murder but had a mental illness. Is it fair to give him the death sentence? Some would say yes because they killed someone, however others would

The issue of justice or fairness is the greatest interest of mankind and every individual desire fair treatment at all times. Lerner, (2003) found that justice affects employees’ effectiveness because of the strong interpersonal relationship that result from fair treatment. The service quality of an organization like a hospital cannot be achieved where employees are dissatisfied and psychologically divorced from their supervisors and organizations. Wong and Sohal, (2003) sees customers’ perceived service quality as the same with the behavioral disposition of employee. The employees’ commitment to supervisors tends to result in their readiness to commit to the overall organizational. In essence, the level of commitment is capable of influencing the quality of service rendered by the employee. Agus, Barker and Kandampully, (2007) remarked that, behaviors that relate to the employees can impact on the quality of service rendered by the organization.

Through the egalitarian reasoning of John Rawls and the act-utilitarianist perspective of J.J.C. Smart, I will analyze the concept of justice. In accordance with Rawls, I intend to argue that any changes in society that will increase the burden carried by the poorest 5% are unjust, even if these changes increase the average level of happiness for the other 95%. With regard to ethics, justice is defined as fairness, where all situations should be treated alike. For one to exhibit justice, one must portray the quality of being fair and reasonable in all situations. While egalitarians evaluate justice based on equality, utilitarians are only interested in justice as a means to an end. Smart advocates the principle of utility, which defines