Justice in Law Enforcement

The criminal justice system is effective in achieving justice, in relations to police power and authority. Police are tasked with an essential role in protecting and enforcing the law. They are a critical aspect towards the criminal justice system and the criminal investigation process. To assist their role to the community, they’ve been provided several types of powers and authorities to achieve their duties towards the community. These authorised powers are used to stop, search and detain a person when they’re certain a crime is committed. Consequently, police can use this authority to potentially violate another individuals’ right, such as privacy. Whilst this power allows police to fulfil their duty to the community, is that justifiable to violate an individuals’ right?

The Miranda warning is a landmark case, the Supreme Court decided five to four majority in the case Miranda v. Arizona in 1966, stating that the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment prohibition against self-implication connected to a person in the custody of a police officer or denied of his opportunity of activity in any substantial way. However, with the specific objective to protect this benefit, the Court ruled, person must, before any questioning, be warned that he has a right to remain silent, that any statement he does make may be used as evidence against him, and that he has right to presence of an attorney, retained or appointed (Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Which allow the right individuals to have an attorney present prior to be questioning. Miranda warning is used and enforced by all law enforcement in the United States. It was established because of the incident of March 13, 1963, with Ernesto Miranda. The Phoenix Police Department arrested Miranda on circumstantial evidence which linked him to kidnap and rape of an eighteen year old woman a

What is justice? Justice Is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, or equity. It is also the act of being just and/or fair. (Crime) It means to me punishment, fairness, and power by that I mean fairness as in equality for others like families, friends, and/or community. You have to have power in order to have fairness for the punishment that has been committed for example: murder, justice will prevail it always does.

In addition to our other rights, we have the rights to enforce the law and judge on our own behalf. We may intervene in cases where our own interests are not directly under threat to help enforce the law of nature. Still, the person who is most likely to enforce the law under these circumstances is the person who has been wronged. The basic principle of justice is that the punishment should be proportionate to the crime. When victims are judging a crime; they likely to judge it of greater severity than an impartial judge. As a result, there will be miscarriages of justice.

The horrific events of September 11, 2001, profoundly altered the way law enforcement agencies conducted business. The creation of new agencies arose, strategies, procedures, and training for law enforcement was necessary to prepare and combat terrorism. In this paper, I will analyze the before and after effects, the events of 9/11 caused in law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and what improvements I feel are needed to keep our nation safe from terrorism.

Means---A person in police custody may refuse to answer any questions relating to the crime that he is suspected of committing. The Supreme Court has ruled that this applies to not only the trial but also, police interrogations. Moreover, if the police want to question a suspect, they must first give him Miranda warnings. Is it genuine that to capture you, a cop needs to let you know the Miranda rights and inquire as to whether you get it? Imagine a scenario in which somebody continues saying they don't get it. As indicated by me-No. This is something individuals got from TV. Cops don't have to peruse you your rights unless you are in authority and they are addressing you. On the off chance that they are not addressing you, they don't have to reveal to you anything. On the off

In the case Miranda v Arizona in 1966, the United States Supreme Court determined, suspects of criminal activities have the right to be free from self-incrimination during an interrogation by law enforcement (Hall, 2015). These findings provided guidelines to law enforcement personnel when questioning individuals suspected of criminal actions since referred to as Miranda warnings. The Miranda warnings are rights given to a suspect before questioning begins advising them of their right to remain silent, their right to speak with an attorney, moreover, acknowledgment of their statements possibly being used against them in court. Additionally, the Miranda rights inform individuals an opportunity to have an attorney present even if they cannot afford one on their own. The State will provide an attorney at no cost to indigent individuals.

As a result of the Miranda case the police must give warnings to all suspects when they have to answer questions related to a criminal case. The Miranda warnings are based on the Fifth Amendment right to be protected from self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment that gives all suspects the right to have an attorney. The Miranda Warnings consist of telling suspects that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law, that they have the right to have an attorney present before and during questioning, and if they can’t afford an attorney one will be provided for them.

The 9/11 attacks has changed how law enforcement response to terrorist attacks. Prior to 9/11 law enforcement were a bunch of entities that acted independently of each other. One of the major things that were affected during 9/11 was the communication and this hit to our communication infrastructure crippling how law enforcement, EMS and FDNY passed information. This attack changed how law enforcement responded to any terrorist attacks. After the terrorist attack law enforcement created a domestic counterterrorism unit to handle moments of disaster and terrorist attacks. These units worked in conjunction with other law enforcement agencies; the sharing of information is all funneled into one system called the Nationwide Suspicious Activity

Introduction There are several videos on internet talking about Miranda rights and how they can protect us from the police if we get arrested to us. Its famous warning is also repeated in countless police procedures on TV: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney

What is justice? Justice is a system of law in which everyone receives their due from the system including their natural and legal rights. Justice is at the center of every debate, involving our criminal justice system, because of its vast majority of definitions. Seeing

The law enforcement official must obtain verbal or written verification that the criminal suspect understands his right to maintain silence. The law enforcement official must then say “Anything you do or say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. Again, the official must obtain verbal or written verification that the criminal suspects understands what is being said to them. The next statement is “You have the right to an attorney before speaking or have an attorney present during any questioning now or in the future. Again, verification of understanding must be established. That statement is then followed by “If you can’t afford an attorney one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you choose. The next Miranda right states that “ If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. The last Miranda right specifically asks “Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?” Again after each and every statement given by the law enforcement official verbal or written verification that the suspect understands must be obtained.

What does justice mean to you? Many interpret justice in various types of ways. The dictionary definition for justice is, “just behavior or treatment.” The dictionary definition doesn’t capture the true layers of injustice or moral relationship with justice.

The efforts directed to the maintenance and increase of homeland security has significantly influenced the debate over federal-state relations, in which cooperation between the federal government and the state governments has increased in order to ensure security and protection against potential threats, such as terrorism. There have been numerous instances in American history of attempts to develop and increase and homeland security as a response to a certain occasion, such as the attacks on 9/11. Efforts directed to increasing homeland security often present a proposed cooperation between the two levels of government, in which both attempt to enact and enforce procedures and decisions that are directed to addressing a particular problem. However, this cooperation is often concluded with a

The Miranda Warning is a part of the Fifth Amendment which entails a person’s privilege against self-incrimination. Before a person can be interrogated an explanation of his or her rights that must be given; the right to remain silent, the right an attorney, the right have an attorney appointed and the right to have an attorney present during questioning (Miranda Warning, n.d.)