Justification, Excuses, And The Insanity Defenses

1401 Words6 Pages
Introduction The nature of lawful defenses, justification, excuses, and the insanity defenses studies the guidelines of controlling the different jurisdictions’ elements. This paper will examine a legal decision/case involving the defenses of justifications mentioned in Chapters 5 and 6. This paper will discuss the case which is state. Justification is a defense depends upon the need of a just cause or excuse (Schmalleger & Hall, 2014). Justification is a lawful reason for an act that signifies the defense of justification. The defense of justification in criminal law can excuse the defendant from responsibility for a criminal act where the act is seen as being required and where the defendant is required to make a choice of evils…show more content…
At the trial, the perpetrator claims that the prosecutor erroneously declared a particular component to jury members to reflect whether perpetrator’s behavior was that of a reasonable man in Goetz’s situation (Klansky, 1988). The court determined that the examination should be completely subjective and dismissed because Goetz’s self-defense was completely reasonable to him (Klansky, 1988). The People of New York refocused an order allowing them to resubmit the dismissed charges to a second grand jury. New York Supreme Court presented a camera analysis and the motion was approved (Klansky, 1988). When the case was shown to the second grand jury, the statement received from two of the four men who had been shot, Troy Canty and James Ramseur, in addition to the four bystanders who had seen part of the incident occur (Klansky, 1988). The second grand jury charged Goetz on ten count indictment which was then combined with the preceding of three count indictment. Goetz moved to dismiss the charges in the second indictment and subsequently extended this motion, declaring that resubmission of the charges selected by the second grand jury was involved because it seemed that Canty and Ramseur had committed perjury and because the prosecutor 's command to the grand jury on the defense of justification was incorrect and damaging to the perpetrator so as to provide the continuing
Open Document