Justification For A Qualitative Methodological Approach

Within this assignment there will be a clear demonstration and understanding of the concept of research in relation to the acquisition of underpinning knowledge appropriate to my programme of study. I will also be undertaking a comparative analysis of the nature and validity of quantitative and qualitative research methods. I will also be demonstrating skills in critical analysis of methods of data collection and selection of appropriate methods to informing future working practice. I will also be analyse the ethical considerations in relation to the development and undertaking of research.

The continued academic tension between qualitative and quantitative inquiry has continued unabated. Scholarship since the 1980s, to redefine both paradigms, attempt to bring balance and importance of the respective contribution of both research processes. This has resulted in an interesting shift for “ensuring structure, process and rigor” from the investigator’s actions during the course of the research, to the reader of the qualitative inquiry. The emphasis on Quantitative strategies implemented during the research process has been replaced by truth value, applicability,

Qualitative method is using open-ended questioning, non-statistical research techniques, or value-based observations. In this research, three main methodologies are adopted as focus group, distributing questionnaires and conducting personal interviews simultaneously. Methods are all appropriate and contributed to a comprehensive research. The reason is that aim of this research is to acquire an in-depth understanding of

One of the strategies not used in this study we the use of group interviews or focus groups. The authors point this fact out in their study indicating that while the results from such interviews would likely add to the evidence of their study, because of the scope of the study this method would need to wait to be utilized in later studies. Limiting the number of uncontrolled variables and not overwhelming the study with multiple research methods that may or may not add to the value of the results at this point seems beneficial and allows room for future

28). Every aspect of the research process is influenced by epistemology, it guides the researcher in justifying the research methods (Carter & Little, 2007; Kramer-Kile, 2012), as it is asking what is knowledge, and how can that knowledge be acquired.

The article breaks down into qualitative research overview, research design, common components and processes to

A qualitative approach was used to carry out this study. Picking out major and minor themes by using thematic

The research method I chose for this study is qualitative semi-structured interview. Qualitative approaches are often used for exploratory and descriptive studies (Neuman, 2007), which suit the objective of this research. Semi-structured interviews compared to rigid structured interview, allows for a more focused, detailed and two-way communication. Detailed data is very helpful for the inductive nature of this study where data is gathered and examined prior to developing a theory(Seidel, 1998). Compared to focus group, it presented a challenge in terms of data recoding and organization, one-on-one interviews are easier to manage.

This study was conducted using qualitative approach. With the aim to exploring patient’s and caregivers experience of gaining access to acute stroke care Harrison et al., (2012). Qualitative approach is appropriate as the study is therefore, concerned with exploring and understanding human experience as they occur and interpret in real life, (Cook, et al., 2013). It can be argued that qualitative research focuses on the credibility of the evidence presented as an authentic account and accurate interpretation of the respondent’s viewpoints in relation to the research question being explored (Burns, et al. (2015). However, the participant could be lying about their experience, therefore qualitative cannot be benchmarked as they depend on participant

Leadership = Communication? The Relations of Leaders’ Communication Styles with Leadership Style, Knowledge Sharing and Leadership Outcomes is an interesting field for research; the article is mainly focused on the methods and relevant research on to investigate the relations between leaders’ communication styles and charismatic leadership and leadership outcomes. The lot of research had already been done over this particular topic, however this article need a little glance of other factors. This article was done by Reinout E. de Vries, Angelique Bakker-Pieper and Wyneke Oostenveld and it clearly aims to describe the effect in behavior of a team and leadership

This chapter presented the research design for addressing the research questions guiding this study. This chapter detailed the design of the research. Research design, sampling process, data collection and analysis were the main aspects that were detailed. The study was conducted by making use of a questionnaire.

Research paradigms are ‘the entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by members of a given community’ (Kuhn, 1970, p.175). The three most common paradigms are positivism, constructivism or interpretivism and pragmatism. Each of these can be categorised further by examining their: ontology, epistemology and methodology. Fundamentally, ontology is the nature of reality, epistemology describes the relationship the investigator has with their version of reality, and methodology is the various techniques and tools used to analysis their research.

There are approaches used fot inquiry. as per (Creswell, 2009) these are quantitative approach, qualitative approach, and mixed methods approach. Each of these approaches has their own strengths and weaknesses. The basic features of the three approaches are summarized below to select the methodology that best suits the research objective. The quantitative research approach is one in which the researcher primarily uses postpositive claims for developing knowledge. Post positivism assumes that causes determine outcomes (Creswell 2009). The approach involves the generation of data in quantitative or numerical form which can be subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis in a formal and rigid fashion (Kothari 2004, p.5).

As my topic can be looked at from many different perspectives, I decided that I first needed to refine my topic into smaller sub questions that would then enable me to have more precise and focused research processes. Some of the research processes I used included qualitative Web-based, journals and interviews and also quantitative surveys and

When selecting the appropriate research methods, it was important for me to carefully consider the approaches that would best fit my research in order to reach meaningful conclusions. I decided to choose approaches that I see fit around my research topic and would ensure I achieve the results to come out of my research. As (Walker, 1985, p.46) advocates that “Just as recipes are not simply things that are done to food, but become concepts within which method and substance are compounded. Methods in research can become an intrinsic part of the project. The methods we choose are, in this sense, there to be tested, just as much as the substantive hypothesis”. This claims that the methods that are chosen to embark on an area of research are a vital part of the project and need to be taken into account just as much as the question that the methods are used to answer it. Therefore, the two approaches I chose to shape my research were a case study and appreciative inquiry to allow me to collect the data I had selected which was the following; questionnaires, interviews and observations.