Juvenile Aftercare Essay

The Juvenile Court authorities must weigh the interests of public security with the needs of wayward youth when making determinations in regards to the most suitable program(s) and the level of circumscription necessitated. There have been thousands of juvenile programs which have been developed and undergone comprehensive recidivism analysis by outside auditors over the past thirty years. Objectives require balance in selecting correctional options that meet individual offender needs to contribute to crime reduction and prevent recidivism. Incarceration is necessary to incapacitate violent offenders; however, there are better alternatives for non-violent offenders who are not career criminals. Programs of incarceration for low offense juvenile

The court process, probation and corrections will be affected as the need for alternative punishments will be necessary, however the main purpose will remain the same with a system wide focus on rehabilitation. A specialized juvenile court is best suited for deciding the fate and needs of juvenile offenders. The court will need to provide a sanction for the rehabilitation programs that best address the juvenile’s issues in lieu of or in tandem with the punishment that matches the crime. Juvenile probation will require ramping up as the case load will drastically increase as probation would be a necessary punishment to fulfill the need for victim justice.

The Reentry policy brief provides input to the Task Force set up by Florida Governor Rick Scott to reduce the number of incarcerated juveniles and avoid increasing the already wide racial disparities of the incarcerated population of juveniles. Most reentry facilities in Florida are run by reentry programs that were expanded from Transition from Prison to Community (TPC) and Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) models. Yet these programs appear to not have fully addressed recidivism among juveniles and are also not tailored to lower the widening racial disparities among the incarcerated juvenile population. Better evidence-based reentry practices are needed to ensure that these programs are not only effective in discontinuing the cycle of recidivism but also address the disproportionate minority contact. A growing body of research demonstrates that comprehensive multi-dimensional reentry frameworks increase the chances of reentry programs stopping the cycle of crime among Florida’s juvenile offenders. A comprehensive multi-dimensional reentry program refers to a standardized program that is implemented statewide and which incorporates evidence based practices such as assessment of needs and risks, individual case planning, and cognitive behavioral interventions.

Rehabilitation for at risk teens has been an ongoing issue that runs deep in certain communities. When kids at young ages are exposed to stress and have to cope early on with dysfunction they are denied the opportunity to mature and conditioned to commit thinking errors that perpetuate a young offender into an adult offender. To find ways to break this cycle John Hubner accounts his time on the Giddings State School Capital Offenders Program and how a group of counselors are able to combine many strategies in rehabilitating young offenders who have committed serious crimes. Young people convicted of serious crimes are often transferred to adult prisons that institutionalize young people to prison life only increasing the likely hood of

As an intern at Juvenile Service Department, I work with the CCP and JASS programs. I am responsible for getting in contact with the youth and family to schedule appointments for services. I conduct the intake assessments, and Youth Level of Service assessment to see which services will be effective for the

Under the guidelines of the current Reentry Initiative, it will be recommended that theBureau of Prisons implements the “Go Home, Stay Home” program. The program will focus on those offenders specifically who are released back into society with a weak family support system, little to no job/trade skills and those who will have a hard time adjusting to release. Assigned case managers will recognize the potential participants prior to the release of an offender. The case manager will customize a plan tailored to individual offenders based on the geographical location in which they may

If a juvenile is not deemed restorable or restorable within the designated time-frame as applied in some states, the charges (delinquency or criminal) against the juvenile must be dismissed and court proceedings terminated. If restorable then a court order remediation plan is produced to meet the individual’s concern surrounding competency and restoration services put in place. Clinical factors associated with restoration outcomes or predictability of restoration are age and gender demographically and no legal factors have consistently been predictive of restorability (Gay, Vitacco, & Ragatz, 2017, p.g. 299). In advisement of restoration planning considerations must be given to the developmental and mental health histories of the juvenile, current mental status, pharmacological, therapeutic and educational responses to therapies and interventions (Grisso, 2005, p.g. 189); and determination of what deficits can be remediated, what interventions can remediate the deficit, where and how can the appropriate remediations be accessed, and how long would successful remediation take? The utilization of out-patient treatment programs and in-patient hospitalizations and residential treatment are often utilized for remediation but must be appropriate to both provide youth services and provide public protection and safety. However, this should

In order to properly address mandatory incarceration for chronic juvenile offender’s criminal activities, it is important to begin with psychological assessments and evaluations. Half of our youths have experienced some type of psychological trauma such as depression, PTSD, personality disorders, anxiety, anger issues, or dissociation, just to name a few (Moroz, K. 2009). In order to determine mandatory incarceration, all of these factors must be considered. I will agree with most of our society that is , if they are a danger to society and serious of the crime, they need to be put into detention, where they cannot cause harm but where they can received the right intervention program and mental health treatment for them, it’s the law. The juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate not punish young offenders. Punishment is not the answer in solving their delinquent behavioral patterns.

According to Ruddell and Thomas (2009), in 2006 it was estimated that there was 93,000 juveniles in either a detention center or juvenile correctional facility; however, the arrest rates have decreased at least by 2,000 since 1993. Many juveniles on release are reoffending quickly since most of them have been locked up throughout their developmental years and their brain did not get the right cognitive development it needed to help make the right decision. Many different states and correctional institutions have started their own different programs to help decrease recidivism rate in juveniles. Two programs that will be examined further are the Capital Offender Group that was implemented by Giddings State School in Texas, and the Juvenile Cognitive Intervention Program that was implemented by the State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections.

lives around; rehabilitation gives kids a second chance. Successful rehabilitation, many argue, is better for society in the long run than releasing someone who's spent their entire young adult life in general prison population. A young person released from juvenile prison is far less likely to commit a crime than someone coming out of an adult facility (Reaves).” This is another way to look at the situation. When it comes to juvenile’s rehabilitation is a way to help the juvenile fully understand what have gotten them in their certain situation. Also, it’s a way to add onto what they can do to make sure the juvenile doesn’t

Rehabilitation and reintegration to guarantee that youth who have committed an offense get the treatment and

The “…purpose of a juvenile detention center is to provide programs and remediation for the youths who are detained” (Smith). The Juvenile Detention Centers claim to offer an array of services which are in place to aid the children. “ Programs such as as individual and group counseling and optional religious services are offered” (Smith). The crime committed by the child does not only affect the child, but it also affects the community in which the crime is committed. By removing the children from the streets it creates a safer environment for the people who live in that community (Center on Early Adolescence).

The goals of juvenile corrections are too deter, rehabilitate and reintegrate, prevent, punish and reattribute, as well as isolate and control youth offenders and offenses. Each different goal comes with its own challenges. The goal of deterrence has its limits; because rules and former sanctions, as well anti-criminal modeling and reinforcement are met with young rebellious minds. Traditional counseling and diversion which are integral aspects of community corrections can sometimes be ineffective, and studies have shown that sometimes a natural self intervention can take place as the youth grows older; resulting in the youth outgrowing delinquency.

The failure of the juvenile detention systems is clearly demonstrated by a lack of direction for the youth. An outstanding 55 percent of the youth put out on probation are rearrested in a 12 month period according to a recent study at youth.gov. This may very well stem from the lack of attention to the children while incarcerated. Punishment is often used as a way of “correcting” the youth. This often escalates into maltreatment of the kids

In today's society juveniles are being tried in adult courts, given the death penalty, and sent to prison. Should fourteen-year olds accused of murder or rape automatically be tried as adults? Should six-teen year olds and seven-teen year olds tried in adult courts be forced to serve time in adult prisons, where they are more likely to be sexually assaulted and to become repeat offenders. How much discretion should a judge have in deciding the fate of a juvenile accused of a crime - serious, violent, or otherwise? The juvenile crime rate that was so alarming a few years ago has begun to fall - juvenile felony arrest rates in California have declined by more than forty percent in the last twenty years. While