Juvenile Boot Camps Research Paper

Some boot camps focus only on hard labor, military drills and physical exercises. Other boot camps focus on rehabilitation programs with the offenders spending most of their time being counseled against their criminal activities of the past. The boot camps also vary in the form of therapeutic programs that they provide to their participants. Some of them emphasize on academic education while others emphasized on group counseling and the thorough treatment of drug and substance abuse. Boot camps also differ in the ways offenders are managed after release.

Juvenile delinquency is a relatively new phenomenon. For this reason, society’s reactions and solutions to the problem of delinquency are also modern developments. The United States developed the first youth court in 1899 and is now home to many new and formerly untested methods of juvenile rehabilitation and correction. One of many unique programs within the Juvenile Justice system, boot camps are institutions designed to keep delinquent juveniles out of traditional incarceration facilities and still provide a structured method of punishment and rehabilitation. Boot camps developed in the early 1990s and quickly proliferated throughout the nation. Specifically, they are “…short-term residential programs modeled after

Juvenile correctional systems have many different components and some are likely to be affected with a primary focus on rehabilitation. Today the United States falls short of providing adequate public juvenile facilities. With a focus on punishment, the need for new facilities will continue to rise. Switching the primary focus to

It is highly recommended to create less restrictive alternatives for the children that don’t require secure detention but still need to be supervised. Enacting legislation that restricts the use of detention would be a very effective strategy followed with funds that could serve as incentives for the detention centers. Intake criteria that limits admission to only those who truly need it, needs to be adopted across all the detention centers in the United States followed by diligent case monitoring (Barton & Schwartz, 1994). Kids who engage in non-dangerous and non-violent behavior shouldn’t have to serve time in secure confinement but rather be put under very intensive supervision and either pay restitution, perform work for their victims or do community service. Incarcerating these youth is not only detrimental to the wellbeing to the youth’s development and the future of our society but also financially costly. We need to create a range of other options for kids who don’t fit the criteria for secure detention such as home detention, family shelter care, and

The Juvenile Court authorities must weigh the interests of public security with the needs of wayward youth when making determinations in regards to the most suitable program(s) and the level of circumscription necessitated. There have been thousands of juvenile programs which have been developed and undergone comprehensive recidivism analysis by outside auditors over the past thirty years. Objectives require balance in selecting correctional options that meet individual offender needs to contribute to crime reduction and prevent recidivism. Incarceration is necessary to incapacitate violent offenders; however, there are better alternatives for non-violent offenders who are not career criminals. Programs of incarceration for low offense juvenile

The corrections department see solitary confinement for juveniles as disciplinary act. Correctional officers put these juveniles in a small room without human interaction for twenty- three hours for juveniles

Juvenile boot camps are what are known as a shock incarceration technique. The purpose of shock incarceration is to scare the convicted into changing their ways. Unlike most other shock incarceration techniques, the boot camp method is designed as a way to promote structure and discipline into the lives of the juveniles. They do this by having a highly structured routine that includes physical training, marching in formation, and professional development activities. The use of juvenile boot camps has been used in the United States since the early 1980’s, but has recently been under fire for not being effective in reducing the rate of recidivism in the juveniles who participate in it. They were first created as an alternative to traditional sentences such as incarceration and parole. Boot camps also benefited the system by being more cost effective to run than those traditional techniques because the programs are much shorter than traditional sentences. The other benefit to the system was it reduced prison overcrowding. The ultimate goal of boot camps is to reduce recidivism, but the question is, are juvenile boot camps accomplishing this goal.

Today in the juvenile justice system there are many alternatives to jail, we have boot camps, reception and diagnostic centers, and ranches/forestry camps all of which have a main goal of trying to prevent youthful offenders from committing any further crimes. The first boot camp for juveniles was the Orleans Parish program started in 1985 anyone who was sentenced by the juvenile judge was allowed into the program through now violent offenders, armed robbers and sex offenders are not welcome in the programs. Boot camps would last from 30 to120 days and followed a strict military type curriculum including rigorous physical training that was intended to shock juvenile offenders.

This paper will highlight the history of the juvenile justice system and juvenile intervention programs to show a link between the current trend of the juvenile justice system, highlighting ineffective and effective juvenile programs. Findings show that housing adults and juveniles together in prison have a negative impact on juvenile delinquency along with ineffective programs such as Scared Straight and boot camps. This research paper will address two research questions focusing on juveniles, how harsh sentencing practices influence juvenile offenders and how juvenile programs has impacted in the criminal justice system. According to the research, harsh sentences have a negative impact on juveniles and their recidivism rates, while programs

Juvenile boot camps are typically a military and hard labor style environment that is completely separate from other prison or jail inmate. The military style gives offenders a strict and scheduled environment. Often offenders placed in boot camps are nonviolent and typically spend six months or less in the program. This program is often used as an alternative to a longer jail sentences. The goal of juvenile boot camps

Currently to deal with juvenile offenders involved in the youth crime, there are two options available. The first option that prevails to a larger extent is known to us as incarceration while the second option that is slowly gaining trends is known to us as rehabilitation programs. This paper focuses on thorough analysis of both these options and the impact that they have on the offenders as well as the society as a whole. The paper also assesses the viability of these options in order to determine which of these will prove to be more effective and beneficial.

Boot camp is an alternative to incarceration. In this paper I will prove that Boot Camps for youthful offenders are effective. Boot camps started in the year 1888 by Warden Zebulon Brockway at the Elmira Reformatory located in Elmira, New York. The warden did this because he wanted to invoke a new way of disciplining and keeping the inmates active. The reasoning that this style of imprisonment worked was because there were virtually no prison guards which saved thousands of dollars. Another reason that it worked was because the men would work day and night producing quality goods that were much less then the competitors. Yates Law prohibited the inmates from competing in the open market which eventually lead to the end of the military

In this project I am going to talk about the problem that different states have in juvenile offenders and how they deal with them in regards to juvenile boot camps, also I am going to explain what is known about juvenile boot camps in the United States, the degree of success of these efforts, and a general summary of boot camps. With that in mind I am going to answer 4 different questions in order to gain a better understanding of this program. The questions I will answer are as follows: How have different jurisdictions dealt with delinquency problems, Which states have boot camps and why, When did these states start using them, and finally What types of offenders are associated with these boot camps.

With the ever rising prison population in this country, something has to be done rehabilitate criminals rather than just lock them up. Many feel that the “new” prisons, boot camps are the answer (Champion 1990). I will give a brief overview of boot camp institutions, specifically, about the operation and structure of these, the cost involved with both juvenile and adult facilities, and how effective they really are with regard to recidivism.

Boot camps have been a controversial topic since there creation for adults in 1983 ( Gover 2000). The term boot camp is widely used however it contains many different aspects depending on its primary focus. Boot camps are programs based off of basic training in the military ( Mackenzie, Wilson, and Kinder 2001). With the main goal of correctional boot camps being, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, punishment, and cost control (Peter, Thomas, and Zamberlan 1997). The primary goal of boot camps when they were first created was to reduce overcrowding in prisons and encourage inmates to contribute positively to society (Perez 71). There are many different types of boot camps such as: substance abuse, educational, job training, as well as life counseling which are then separated into juveniles and adults boot camps. Although the main focus of many programs are the same each individual program widely differs from one another . The amount of time inmates spend in boot camp differs widely as well as the activities they preform and the amount of aftercare that is provided (Peter, Thomas, and Zamberlan 1997).