Juvenile Court Research Paper

Today’s juvenile court system handles most cases involving those under the age of 18-year-old. This was not always the case and the ideal of a separate court system for adults and children is only about 100 years old. When looking at the differences that set juvenile courts apart, it is important to study the history and see how it developed over time.

There are many known, crooked, twisted ways of our juvenile system.So many young children getting their lives destroyed and ruined all because of our juvenile system.This Problem became noticed in 1960 when a 15 year old boy got arrested and had a life changing, ruining, experience all because of a prank phone call. In 1967 the supreme court finally tried to resolve this problem and bring justice to all children, but fixing it wasn't going to be as easy as giving childrens, teens, rights to a lawyer, and no double jeopardy. In the late 90s and early 2000s over 200,000 children were tried as adults, children getting the death penalty and getting life in jail without even chance of parole.There was even a

Being put within a system at a young age will lead them to more and dangerous lives to live. Juvenile justice laws varies in the United States. My paper is to discuss the difference in jurisdictions among these three states, Maryland, New York and South Carolina. Where the ages vary of a juvenile offender can be prosecuted as an adult between the ages 15-17. The State of MD, average youth offender age is 17 years old. All court cases involving youth excluded from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court based on age and offense criteria at the time of arrest. So this means if this your first time the courts may take all of that into consideration.

The Department of Juvenile Justice has many responsibilities inside a secure facility and intake is considering a critical area. While working in intake there is no room for error. A simple mistake can cause a new identity to youth or even a youth being released that should not. You should be alert and very detailed while working in the intake

Juvenile justice has meant different things to different generations as the concepts have changed to respond to public pressures, politics, and the development of the juvenile justice system (Quigley, 1999). During colonial times children were small adults and were considered parent’s property, and they had no rights (Hinton et al, 2007).

This student/advocate is choosing to focus on the Juvenile Court system. The goal of juvenile court may differ from criminal court, but the processes have parity in operation. Both systems are committed to protecting society and holding criminal offenders culpable for their actions. Depending on the jurisdiction and the accessibility of programs, status offenders and Part II juvenile offenders may enter alternative restoration programs instead of the juvenile court system. In regards to Part I predatory and violent offenders, these should be removed from society; therefore, traditional justice is a necessity.

In a court room according to Rule of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure (2015) Rule 1.03(1) people under the age of 18, minors are known as having a disability and not having mental capacity. They are not able to validate contracts, make or witness wills, etc. This ruling is because a child or teen's decision-making skills are not developed in the same way that an adult is.

The central purpose of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate rather than serve punishment. Rehabilitate to prevent further delinquent criminal acts through behavior through the establishment of educational, social and emotional assessments which allows the youth to mature within society and themselves. The contributing factors that lead to crime within the youth can range from various sources. Some of those factors could be peer pressure from peers, parental criminality, drug use such as alcohol or smoking, mental illnesses, having the opportunity to commit a crime, etc. Whether a youth or any person decides to commit a crime, they have a decision to either do it or not. Some people cannot control their actions within themselves because

Desai, A. R., Goulet, L. J., Robbins, J., Chapman, F. J., Migdole, J. S., & Hoge, A. M., (2006).

The juvenile court appears to be organized similar to criminal court but with a few different terms. One of the main differences is that a juvenile is being tried for a delinquent act, not a crime – unless the delinquent act was very serious, than the juvenile can be tried for a crime in adult court. This is not an option for adults in criminal court, they can’t be “downgraded” to a delinquent act because the crime may not be very serious.

Poor education, low school attendance, peer pressure, disadvantaged socioeconomic status, and substance abuse are a few factors that have the greatest impact upon the commission of crimes by juveniles. These factors could possibly drive a young person to commit crimes. I strongly feel that the social learning has contributed a major role in the juvenile world from negative influences. Once those negative influences are within the youth, they then display their actions within their criminal behavior. Overall, it is very concise that the propensity for criminal behavior begins prior to adulthood.

Prisons are designed to house people who have broken the law and to remove them from free society. Inmates are imprisoned for a set period of time and have very limited freedoms during their incarceration. While every prison serves the same basic purpose, there are many different types of prisons.

The progressive movements, in the United States, to improve society in physical, emotional and intellectual health continues to improve every day. In this progress, juvenile delinquents create an interesting debate, as alternative placements continue to be utilized, while youth continue to change. In order to find the best treatments for juvenile delinquents, it is necessary to approach the past and analyze the success between different treatments and what each alternative placement attempts to control. As a whole, the goal of treating juvenile delinquents differently than offenders, is to avoid having youth grow to become criminals and discourage

According to the new system the Juvenile Justice Board has to conduct a preliminary investigation to decide whether the child had the maturity and could understand the consequences of the act. If the board feels the child had the physical and mental capacity to do the offence, he is sent to the children’s court to be treated as an adult. The court can try the child under section 18, which is regarding what to be done when the child is innocent. So the drafting is done in such a manner that the child can treated as an adult because the innocence can be found out only once he/she is under trial. At the age of 21, it is decided whether the person should be let out or not. The new system gives out the idea that there are some humane considerations but it has severe flaws.

Once the juvenile has been detained and summoned into the juvenile court system, the court system follows the basic ideals: that the court should function as a social clinic designed to serve in the best interest of the youth in trouble; that the youths should be given the same care, supervision, and discipline as a good parent would provide; that the aim of the court is to help, to restore, to guide, and to forgive; that the youths should not be treated as criminals; and that the right to shelter, protection, and proper guardianship are the only rights of youths (Bartollas, C. 2011). Under these guidelines the courts tries and sentences the juvenile in the best possible way to rehabilitate and reform the youth. There have been numerous changes in the juvenile court system in order to allow the system to become different than that of the adult court system.