Juvenile Court Research Paper

On 05/23/2018 at approximately 2226 hours, I, Deputy A. Martinez Vazquez (117015) responded to 211 Mission Rd., Oviedo, Seminole County, Fl. In reference to a disturbance inside of the residence. While in route to the residence, I was notified that the disturbance turned physical against a mother and daughter. Before I arrived to the residence I was notified that the 15 year old female juvenile was inside of her room.

1. Some of the cues in deciding whether to handle a case officially or unofficially include the age of the officer, the wishes of the complainant, race/attitude/gender of the offender, and the nature of the offense. In most instances, it is up to the officer’s discretion to determine how they will handle the situation. The dangers in relying on these cues from an officer’s point of view could be deception. For example, if a young officer encounters a juvenile misbehaving they might be deceived by the teenager since they do not have much experience with them.

Tony Cotton, who has been the lead attorney for one of the girls, said ahead of the

Petitioner was arrested when he was 16, he got charges for breaking and entering, robbery and rape. Petitioner, was subject to jurisdiction issues from the District of Columbia Juvenile Court, after full investigation, the court would waive jurisdiction over him and send him to trial for the charges. Petitioner's Lawyers filed a motion in the Juvenile Court for a hearing a waiver on charges, and to gain access to the Juvenile Court's Social Service file which was gathered on petitioner during his probation for his previous offense. The Juvenile Court would not rule on these motions. They entered an order wanting to waive jurisdiction, but after the full investigation was done. Petitioner was indicted in the District Court. He moved to dismiss the charges, but the Court overruled the motion, and petitioner was tried. He was convicted on six counts of breaking and entering, and robbery, but acquitted on two counts of rape by reason of insanity. petitioner raised, among other things, the validity of the Juvenile Court's waiver of jurisdiction.. (united, n.d.)

Are juvenile justice centers are beneficial for troubled teens? Well I agree that juvenile justice centers are beneficial for troubled teens for many reasons, here's a couple .First,teens are young adults and they are suppose to make mistakes so that they can learn from them. Secondly, some teens don't have parents to show them what is good and what is bad. lastly, our teens are the future of this word so we need to get them ready. Let me break it down a little more for you. First thing's first, Teens are young adults and they are suppose to make mistakes so that they can learn

Wilma Mankiller, my fellow Cherokee, believed that "individually and collectively, Cherokee people possess an extraordinary ability to face down adversity and continue moving forward." However, this isn't limited to the Cherokees. All tribal people have faced challenges and have continued to thrive. Therefore, juveniles delinquents have the ability to improve their lives. Some viable tribal and community-based alternatives to detention for juveniles who have committed non-violent offenses include community service, giving or attending lectures about the dangers of criminal behavior, and participating in support groups. These alternatives are successful in rehabilitation and prevention of crime.

Juvenile Justice Centers are secure prisons or jails for minors under the age of 18. Many say they do not help and potentially lead to a more damaged teen who was better before getting in there, but is this really the case? Some of these facilities have great programs that can teach these minors how to act and have a good character when they get out. Juvenile Justice Centers are beneficial to the inmates because they can teach important character traits and sets the inmates up for a future most thought were not reachable in the first place.

onathan Romero April 18, 2017 Juveniles should be tried as an adult in the court of law at the age of 18 because he or she has full reasoning skills and experience due to brain development, and life experience of their childhood life. Mike Tikkanen explains, "More than 200,000 individuals under the age of 18 are prosecuted in criminal court each year. " These youths can be as young as 17, without a full understanding of what is happening. The Judges and the jury come with the hard decision of saying whether the outcome is a penalty as an adult or a juvenile institution. This is wrong within the court system to be doing this, since sometimes the person is mentally handicapped, and the way someone is being tried should be changed very soon.

Nash & Edgecombe Teen Court is where I decided to complete my service learning for this grading period. If you don’t know what “Teen Court” is i’ll be more than happy to explain. Teen court is held on certain dates, in either Rocky Mount, Tarboro or Nashville. You pick your preference. Teen court includes teen’s from ages 14-18 that participate in real live court sessions of other teens who decided to go to teen court as an alternative instead of going to real court. In the courtroom we have the judge, lawyers, jury, clerk, reporter and most importantly the witness. As the teen in the court you can decided whether you want to be a clerk, jury member or a lawyer. I am summoned for court in all three cities, in order to appear in court you must

Today’s juvenile court system handles most cases involving those under the age of 18-year-old. This was not always the case and the ideal of a separate court system for adults and children is only about 100 years old. When looking at the differences that set juvenile courts apart, it is important to study the history and see how it developed over time.

The boy was charged after his mother brought him to state police barracks the day of the murder, saying her son told her "he got mad, lost his temper and grabbed a cane and put it around Novak's throat," police told The Associated Press.

There are many known, crooked, twisted ways of our juvenile system.So many young children getting their lives destroyed and ruined all because of our juvenile system.This Problem became noticed in 1960 when a 15 year old boy got arrested and had a life changing, ruining, experience all because of a prank phone call. In 1967 the supreme court finally tried to resolve this problem and bring justice to all children, but fixing it wasn't going to be as easy as giving childrens, teens, rights to a lawyer, and no double jeopardy. In the late 90s and early 2000s over 200,000 children were tried as adults, children getting the death penalty and getting life in jail without even chance of parole.There was even a

For awhile now I have felt the call to serve children in a unique way. The more I prayed about God’s calling the more he directed me to the criminal justice field. As I did my research I came to realize that the juvenile justice system was where God wanted me. As a freshman in college I decided to pursue a degree in criminal justice. However, this evolved into a double major in criminal justice and psychology. I have chosen to make this calling my profession. There are many ways I hope to impact the lives of juveniles, as well as the system itself. Due to the tough on crime era, some children are been transferred into the adult court one non–homicidal cases. Some have been tried as an adult for drug offense. I firmly believe this jeopardizes

take some time in order to make the proper decision. There are a few different ways

Serious crimes such as murder, burglary and rape have raised questions as to whether the young offenders should face severe punitive treatment or the normal punitive measures in juvenile courts. Many would prefer the juveniles given harsh punishment in order to discourage other young people from engaging in similar activities and to serve as a lesson to these particular offenders. However, results from previous studies indicate such punitive measures were neither successful nor morally acceptable. Instead, the solutions achieved have unfairly treated the youths and compromised the society status (Kristin, page 1).