Juvenile Incarceration Crime

Consequently, former incarcerated individuals will become in danger of remaining a permanent lower class because they have many limitations on the type of jobs that will be available to them, which mostly pays minimum wages. To make matters worse, many former incarcerated individuals do not obtain much education, which will diminish their ability of facing the challenges of 21st century workforce and reduce any chance for a high quality of life. Many inmates may possibly entered prison without obtaining any high school credentials, which could be one of the reasons that recidivism remains prominent. “Three-quarters of state prison inmates are dropouts, as are 59% of federal inmates. In fact, dropouts are 3.5 times more likely than high school graduates to be incarcerated in their lifetime” (AYPF). Many of these prisoners may have been incarcerated for a long period of time; consequently, causing their skills to become more obsolete compare to skills that were required before they entered the penal system. The development of technology, scientific, and medical programs may not be as prominent and sophisticated as it was before their arrest, especially since United States just recently proposed implementing 21st century courses in secondary institutions. “State prisoners average a tenth-grade education and score below their grade level on cognitive tests” (Western 2008). They will have to start with lower level courses if they want to

Over 1/3 of the 11,000 index crime arrests were juveniles under the age of 16.

The article "The Impact of Career and Technical Education Programs on Adult Offenders: Learning Behind Bars" by Howard Gordon and Bracie Weldon (2003) studies of how prisoners receiving educations in prison reduces the recidivism rate. Gordon and Weldon studied the inmates who were participating in the educational programs at the Huttonsville Correctional Center in West Virginia and claimed that inmates who participated in the educational programs were less likely to recidivate once released back into the population as compared to inmates who did not participate in these programs (Gordon & Weldon, 2003). This study provides valuable information as to the effectiveness of educational programs in prison and how they affect prisoner's lives

Studies suggest that there is a divide between the government and public response to juvenile incarceration. Bullis & Yovas (2005) state that support is given to correctional facilities to house juvenile offenders as a form of punishment (as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 17). Individuals who support this perspective are often more likely to support the construction of more prisons and stern penalties on crime based upon the presumptions that youthful offenders are aware of the consequences of their actions (Drakeford, 2002 as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 17). On the other hand, opponents of this perspective believe that incarceration creates an opportunity to rehabilitate the offenders (Huffine, 2006 as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 18). This perspective supports the purpose of juvenile detention centers as “preparatory in nature – that is, offering services focused on the development of skills needed to return successfully to mainstream

Youth are often confronted with socio-economical and political challenges including poverty, ethic and minority status and are often cited as at risk for committing long-term community problems like rise in crime due to substance abuse, school drop-out and several forms of academic failures, delinquencies, criminal offenses and unemployment (e.g. Grisso, Vincent & Seagrave, 2005; Champion & Mays, 1991; Fellmeth, 2002). According to Grisso and his colleagues (2005), the argument that in order to help young offenders that were placed under rehabilitation centers reconnect to community and avoid recidivism is to provide them education and employment opportunities upon release. It is in this area where mentoring programs to

Not only this but, “offenders who commit new offenses after court contact are at risk for a variety of poor developmental and life course outcomes, including school failure, out of home placements, occupational marginality, and long-term involvement in criminal activity” (Schwalbe 2004). As seen here, this is a downward spiral. Active reform has never before been at such a demand. As recidivism and juvenile delinquency continues to increase, not only will national crime rates and juvenile prison populations inflate, but the diminishing of an educated, safe, and economically stable society will also be affected regrettably. If juveniles whom continue to commit repeat criminal offenses lack school initiative, family support, and job exposure, than relatively as recidivism and juvenile criminal activity increases, our nation’s standard of living will consequently lower.

Additionally, Ameen & Lee (2010) are focused on what a juvenile is going to do after his or her detention is completed. These two researchers wanted to make it known that juveniles in detention, especially for a significant amount of time, need access to vocational training. Vocational training can aid in eliminating the down time a juvenile has. In turn, the detained juvenile is thought to have fewer violations, fewer punishments, as well as a greater chance for employment. Delinquent youth that are detained have had a disruption in the normal transition from a juvenile leading into the late teen years, and then onto adulthood. If these disruptions are not remedied, then the youth has a decreased chance of a normal life (Ameen & Lee, 2010).

Write a 700 to 1,050 word paper summarizing the key points of the “Juvenile Arrests 2008” article. Address the following;

Those who make and influence policy are eager to know “more about what happens to youth after they have been in contact with the juvenile justice system. What are their rearrest and reincarceration rates? How do they fare in terms of education, employment, and other important outcome measures while they are under juvenile justice supervision and afterward?”(p.1). Sullivan points out that society’s “tough on crime mentality” is the precursor to trying youth as adults. Incarcerating them in adult prisons only increases their chances to offend and become repeat offenders. (p.9) “Being in adult facilities alone does not just increase the chance for being a recidivist. Simply the act of criminal court processing, even without a criminal sentencing,

Juvenile recidivism is a significant predictor of engaging in crime as an adult. Research has shown that different factors also contribute to the likelihood of offending as an adult such as negative early life experiences, family-related problems, mental health issues, and school disabilities. In their sample of 100,000 youths, Barrett and Katsiyannis (2016) also examined the variables that are associated with adult criminal offending, such as demographics, family background, disabilities, mental illness diagnoses, and age of first offense. They also examined the role that early life experiences play in influencing criminal behavior as adult. The researchers found that individuals who were arrested as adults were more likely than non-offenders

In recent decades, juvenile crime has become somewhat of a controversy due to the young age and immaturity of these criminals. Incidences of juvenile crime skyrocketed in the 1980s and 1990s, and policymakers pushed for laws that sent children as young as thirteen years old to trial, and even made them eligible for prison sentences. The general public has expressed a common desire to reduce the incidence of juvenile crime and find effective legislation to discipline these youths, but there are questions about these methods. What is more effective, incarceration or rehabilitation? Does criminal punishment intimidate more youths away from a life of crime, and would productive rehabilitation efforts influence these youths to becoming more valuable members of society?

Juvenile delinquency has been a problem in the United States ever since it has been able to be documented. From 100 years ago to now, the process of juvenile delinquency has changed dramatically; from the way juveniles are tried, to the way that they are released back into society, so that they do not return back to the justice system (Scott and Steinberg, 2008). Saying this, juveniles tend to

Juvenile offending is a major problem in society. Understanding the risk factors that contribute to the increased likelihood of a juvenile to engage in delinquency is important. There are many factors that can influence the increased risk of juvenile delinquency. These factors include poverty, low socioeconomic status, age (Jarjoura, Triplett, & Brinker, 2002), race, gender (Lucero, Barret, & Jensen, 2015), education (Lucero, Barret, & Jensen, 2015; Jarjoura, 1993), and family structure (Anderson, 2002; Kierkus & Hewitt, 2009). It is important to examine if some risk factors can contribute more than others and to what extent they interact with one another. This paper will discuss three important risk factors that contribute to the likelihood of juveniles engaging in deviant acts. The three risk factors discussed are poverty, family structure, and educational attainment. In addition, this paper will demonstrate how these three risk factors interact with one another, resulting in a higher propensity for involvement in juvenile delinquency.

Juvenile delinquency is a serious, costly problem that undermines the health and well-being of our nation’s families and communities. Identifying childhood, youth and family risk factors is vital in the prevention of juvenile offending behavior and juvenile court involvement. An ecological view of child development which treats children through their broader environment rather than through isolated intervention has proven to be highly effective. By improving parents’ interactions with these systems, and by helping them to support their child’s physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional development, early intervention programs make positive changes in overall functioning that is making children more effective in a variety of social contexts.

The younger generation is important to the future of the country, yet juvenile crime continues to be a serious problem in the United States. Over the years the numbers have decreased, but the data shows that the number of youth committing crimes in the US is still in the millions. The focus of detention centers, court agencies, juvenile justice policymakers, and parents alike is to reduce the rate and the occurrence of recidivism among the juvenile population. Recidivism is the tendency of persons with prior criminal history, to be arrested, convicted, or incarcerated repeatedly. The facilities that deal with the criminal population look at recidivism to determine how successful institutional programs are and what is and is not working. There has been much research done on what contributes to recidivism. Recidivism is a complex problem with numerous predictors, but in this research paper, two areas will be discussed. I will focus on the area of parenting and the effects it has on the adolescents who fall victim to recidivism, as well as neighborhood-level factors that influence recidivism. While looking at these two factors that maintain the rate of recidivism, I will present current solutions that have been employed to attempt to reduce the trend, through community and institutionally based programs. The research and analysis presented in this paper should offer valuable insight for social workers, juvenile justice professionals, policymakers and any person who