Juvenile Justice System Research Paper

The juvenile justice system was subject to a lot of corruption and civil rights violations in its early stages. Juveniles did not have the same rights as adults and could be forced into terrible living or working conditions. With no child labor laws, delinquent juveniles could be sentenced to forced labor in factories or to houses of refuge. With the ruling of Ex Parte Crouse, the state took ultimate responsibility of children and send them to these institutions, even against the will of the parents. Some of these institutions, such as houses of refuge may have started with good intention, but they ultimately led to rampart corruption and abuse of juveniles.

There are various efforts that are currently underway to bring about changes and reform in the juvenile justice system. One such program is The Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University. This is a program that supports and educates leaders across systems of care to advance a balanced, multi-system approach to improving outcomes for, and promoting the positive development of, youth at risk of juvenile justice involvement (Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, 2014).

Juvenile Justice Centers are secure prisons or jails for minors under the age of 18. Many say they do not help and potentially lead to a more damaged teen who was better before getting in there, but is this really the case? Some of these facilities have great programs that can teach these minors how to act and have a good character when they get out. Juvenile Justice Centers are beneficial to the inmates because they can teach important character traits and sets the inmates up for a future most thought were not reachable in the first place.

There are currently two programs specifically in Henderson County which I am writing this paper about. One of the programs is the local Boys and Girls Club of Henderson County and the D.A.R.E. Program of Henderson County. I decided to write about local programs because it would give me the opportunity to learn more about juvenile delinquency prevention programs within my own community. Both programs are a huge staple within Henderson County and are two of the most important juvenile delinquency prevention programs within Henderson County.

Studies have conducted that those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) are wrongly treated in juvenile justice systems. In this article, written by Kristi Holsinger and Jessica P. Hodge, these two authors go into great detail on the ways the LGBT community is wrongly treated within the juvenile justice system and analyze an interview that examines the challenges for the staff and for the women, as well as how to support those who are members of the LGBT community.

There are many known, crooked, twisted ways of our juvenile system.So many young children getting their lives destroyed and ruined all because of our juvenile system.This Problem became noticed in 1960 when a 15 year old boy got arrested and had a life changing, ruining, experience all because of a prank phone call. In 1967 the supreme court finally tried to resolve this problem and bring justice to all children, but fixing it wasn't going to be as easy as giving childrens, teens, rights to a lawyer, and no double jeopardy. In the late 90s and early 2000s over 200,000 children were tried as adults, children getting the death penalty and getting life in jail without even chance of parole.There was even a

The American Juvenile justice system is where youth, who are caught in a criminal act, are convicted of their crimes. The juvenile justice system also intervenes using the police, court and correctional facility for delinquent behavior. The juvenile justice system was not always around. There was only criminal court or adult court, there are many differences between juvenile court and adult court. And also, there are some exceptions on which youth could be charged as adults.

Every crime that people commit have consequences, depending on how big the crime was, the consequences can be worst and worst, those crimes can be paid on jail or community service, if you go to jail, and you are an adult, you are going to a jail in which everybody is an adult, or if you are an juvenile you are going to rehabilitation center, which is like jail but for juveniles. If you committed a crime, the court will decide where are you gonna go or how are you gonna pay for your crime, that is determined by whether you are an adult or a young person, they can say that you are an adult or a young person by your age, those ages can change according in what city or country you are. There are two kind of systems that say what is gonna be penance, those systems are the adult justice system and the juvenile justice system. This document is about the juvenile justice system in comparison to the adult justice system.

Although based on the adult criminal justice system, the juvenile justice process works differently. Juveniles can end up in court by way of arrest, truancy or for curfew violations or running away. A youth may also be referred to the juvenile court system by school officials or a parent or guardian for being continuously disobedient. The juvenile justice process involves several different steps including intake, detention, adjudication, disposition and aftercare following release from a juvenile correctional facility. In this paper we will breakdown the numerous steps involved in the juvenile justice process as well as compared some

Juvenile justice is a complicated topic. The justice of a juvenile will always be a tricky issue that will never be able to be a set of rules. There are certain circumstances that get leniency or they will get treated as an adult. Just like any other crime there are measure that could have prevented. Crime control is an important key in the criminal justice system.

I agree that society has their own views on illegal behaviors of juveniles and juvenile justice system. Judges the arresting officer on the crime scene all make a decision in the juvenile delinquent cases. Correctional officer also makes decision once the juvenile gets convicted and sent to a juvenile detention center. In North Carolina, a juvenile can be tried as an adult at the age of 17 in their courts.

Juvenile justice has meant different things to different generations as the concepts have changed to respond to public pressures, politics, and the development of the juvenile justice system (Quigley, 1999). During colonial times children were small adults and were considered parent’s property, and they had no rights (Hinton et al, 2007).

As for the supporters, in their view, that the juvenile justice system helps young offenders to rehabilitation to be productive citizens; instead of incarceration in adult prisons. Some prosecutors and psychologists say that brain research would prove that young people who commit violent crimes are unable to control their behavior. Therefore, they are referring not to punish young people as adults. The research shows that youths cannot be like adults, and they need the advice to change their behavior. Says Michael Harris, the first deputy to the National Center for Law says events in California “No young person should be tried in adult court," he says "It's more counterproductive than going through the juveniles justice system, and nothing

Over twenty five thousand people have been violently killed this year in America, and while the US has an amazing criminal justice system, many of those crimes were committed by juveniles. It is noteworthy, however, that many of those, in turn, were not truly guilty, but simply made a bad choice. The truth is, an adult’s sentence makes finding housing and jobs harder, and juveniles may receive a sentence similar to an adult’s, despite their age. In addition, even the juvenile justice system, not to mention the adult one, can increase the odds of breaking the law again in life, and teenagers’ brains simply have difficulty in decision-making, for no fault of their own. It follows that children should receive less punishing sentences than adults.

Juvenile probation officers till today have the obligatory to make various judgements about the case management of juvenile offenders on a daily basis. The following scholarship inspected officer’s insights of the youth’s repetition violations before carrying out of a risk/needs assessment tool, and t self-reported, case management after proposal of risk/ need assessment tools by the officer. Juvenile probation officers give the impression to be making service recommendation and placement judgements equal with youths’ risk levels, regardless of if they claimed to use risk /need assessment tool while making their decisions. Implications for use of risk assessment in juvenile probation will be discussed in this paper.