Juvenile Treatment Programs Research Paper

Every juvenile delinquent cannot be rehabilitated, but every juvenile delinquent should be given every opportunity and available resource to rehabilitate. The reason for not having a 100% success rate in rehabilitation, has to do with the physical

Most prisons offer programs that will help the offender to rehabilitate, such programs can help the offender with anger management, domestic violence, drink & driving, alcohol abuse, and drug rehabilitation. Personally I believe that we should work hard on rehabilitating all offenders but especially the juveniles because they are not as competent as adults and there is a greater likelihood that they will change, although the main focus should be on rehabilitation of all offenders therefore making our communities safer.

Should convicted youth gang members be treated like other juvenile delinquents, including status offenders and why do you feel the way you do?

Rehabilitation assumes criminal behavior can be improved with non-punitive methods. Rehabilitation, although non-punitive, usually occurs along side punishment. For instance an incarcerated person may be given many rehabilitative options. Mental health programming, substance abuse counseling and even education programming exist in modern day correctional facilities. A judge may sentence someone to attend rehabilitative programming as a part of probation or it may be included as a stipulation in a plea agreement. At the core of rehabilitation is the thought that a criminal is flawed, often through no fault of their own. Poverty, mental health issues, or childhood trauma may all contribute to a criminal life and rehabilitation attempts to aid in a sort of recovery. If a person is cured of their issues, perhaps they will not recidivate.

Since juvenile offenders are viewed as immaturity because their brains are not completely developed, they are considered as what is desired to be protected and educated in general. Minors are believed to be competent to be held responsible for their actions. Recently, it has been debated that juvenile offenders should be punished tougher like adult offenders or should not be punished tougher. The question is whether recent treatments are appropriate or not. If not, what kinds of treatments should provide for minor offenders to clean up their criminal behavior?

Van Nagel, C., Foley, L. a., Dixon, M., & Kauffmen, J. (1986). A review of treatment methods for the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents. Correctional Education, 37(4), 140-145. http://www.jstor.org.hmlproxy.lib.csufresno.edu/stable/23291726

Juvenile Justice Centers are secure prisons or jails for minors under the age of 18. Many say they do not help and potentially lead to a more damaged teen who was better before getting in there, but is this really the case? Some of these facilities have great programs that can teach these minors how to act and have a good character when they get out. Juvenile Justice Centers are beneficial to the inmates because they can teach important character traits and sets the inmates up for a future most thought were not reachable in the first place.

The original purpose of the court was to separate juvenile offenders from adult offenders, to provide opportunities for rehabilitation and treatment, to create a more informal setting in which to resolve criminal behavior by children, and to limit the consequences of children’s criminal conduct

Are juvenile justice centers are beneficial for troubled teens? Well I agree that juvenile justice centers are beneficial for troubled teens for many reasons, here's a couple .First,teens are young adults and they are suppose to make mistakes so that they can learn from them. Secondly, some teens don't have parents to show them what is good and what is bad. lastly, our teens are the future of this word so we need to get them ready. Let me break it down a little more for you. First thing's first, Teens are young adults and they are suppose to make mistakes so that they can learn

Certainly there are many methods for the successful rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. According to Mary Dallao’s “Rehabilitation Programs Can Reduce Youth Violence,” hardcore boot camps are the best method for deterring youth crime (www.galegroup.com). Dallao conducts a study at a boot camp located in California. She interviews a young man named Ben.

I agree with you Billy; the numbers do not lie; therefore, Juvenile Justice Systems around the country, in my opinion, are making excuses to combat juvenile crimes. The Juvenile Justice System claims to provide programs, which reform juveniles once they enter the system. However, juveniles are being released and becoming repeating for same offenses. When juveniles are bind over to criminal court they are afforded the same conditions as adults; therefore, juvenile offenders are posting bail. What message is the United States Juvenile Justice System sending to the public? "National research shows that on average, youth who are prosecuted as adults are 34% more likely to commit additional felonies than youth who commit similar offenses, but remain

In addition, near 90,000 Juveniles offenders are held in some type of residential facility in the United States. As with adults, the incarceration of juveniles is often justified as keeping communities safer, but according to Matt DeLisi and colleagues (2011) confinement in juvenile facilities negatively impact on youths’ physical and mental health and increased subsequent offending. As with adult offenders, we must do a better job of deciding whom to send to prison and ensuring that programs are available for them when sent to prison. Targeting intervention within the facilities is essential due to many of our youths having mental health issues and those individuals of criminogenic (substance abuse offender) addicts

Currently to deal with juvenile offenders involved in the youth crime, there are two options available. The first option that prevails to a larger extent is known to us as incarceration while the second option that is slowly gaining trends is known to us as rehabilitation programs. This paper focuses on thorough analysis of both these options and the impact that they have on the offenders as well as the society as a whole. The paper also assesses the viability of these options in order to determine which of these will prove to be more effective and beneficial.

For over a hundred years, our country believed that the juvenile justice system would serve as a bridge to acquire the long lost appropriate justice intended to deal with the heinous crimes that people, under a specific range of ages, have committed in the sense of bringing along the possibility that the given have not endeavored these deeds. The system believes that these people are not entirely blamable for there are factors that are not in the realm of their control, which in the worst case scenario, have led them to their unbecoming. Thus, the system believes that, under several steps and procedures, rehabilitation and in due time, rooms for possible changes are at great odds.

In the past, children who were apprehended for committing crimes, were tried in the same courts as adults. Furthermore, when the children were found guilty, they were given the same punishments as the adults (Austin, Johnson & Gregoriou, 2000). Today, a separate justice system exists for children who commit crimes. The concept of a distinct justice system and treatment for juveniles has come under attack in recent years because communities across the nation began to experience dramatically increased rates of juvenile crime. The increasing incidence and severity of crimes committed by juveniles led many to question the efficacy of the juvenile court system and to call for a harsher response to juvenile crime. This has led to more juvenile arrests,