On April 9, 2014, a violent outburst was experienced by students during their day at school. The catastrophe occurred in, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, a city close to Pittsburgh. The accused perpetrator of this heinous act is sixteen year old Alex Hribal. The stabbing spree took place at a local high school in Murrysville, Franklin Regional Senior High School, where Hribal is a sophomore. The carnage began just before the start of classes when Hribal entered the school hallway with two kitchen knives hidden from sight. The suspect began his rampage by stabbing students in the hallway and then moving from class to class. A security guard alerted police of the slaughter at 7:13 am, expressing knowledge and the gravity of the violent episode. …show more content…
However, I do not believe it received the same amount of attention it would have if the accuser had used a gun. As a result of knife being used in place of a gun, less attention was given to the crime. Hribal could face almost up to six hundred years of sentencing if found guilty of all courts and sentenced to serve them consequently. Although not mandatory, Pennsylvania employs advisory sentencing guidelines for judges (McClam, 2014). Therefore the sentence for Hribal is unknown, but it is most likely that he’ll receive a life in prison sentence without the possibility of parole. He will not receive the death penalty that Pennsylavia offers though, as juveniles can’t be executed by law. If sentenced in juvenile court, the court could only detain him until he is twenty one years old. Depending on the test results of the mental capability of Hribal, I believe he should be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or institutionalized to a mental institution to help him. If deemed to have no mentally incapability and institutionalized; I feel that Hribal should have a chance to be released upon a recommendation from the mental institution that he has received treatment and is mentally capable of interaction and being a positive, contributing member of society. My perspective is that if this act was done with full mental capacity then there is little to no chance of rehabilitation. However, he could still
In April, 2014, over twenty people were injured at Franklin Regional High School in Murrysville, Pennsylvania. A 16-year-old student, Alex Hribal was in possession of kitchen knives that he used to stab innocent students and the security guard at the school. He was described as a boy that stayed to himself a lot but, he was never bullied. They could not figure out a possible motive that he could have had to want to stab so many people in the school. Sam King, the assistant principal of Franklin Regional High School tackled him to put a stop to his rampage and Hribal was charged as an adult.
Picture a mother receiving a phone call from the local police station that her ten-year-old son is being held in a jail cell for stealing school supplies and is facing charges of five years in prison; his mother weeps as she knows it is her fault for not being able to afford them. This has been an issue in the juvenile system since the early 1800s. The juvenile justice system has not been strong enough to find an appropriate sentence for small crimes committed by children who are not living stable lives. In the 1800s, they believed that the death sentence was one of the only ways to teach people that crime is not permissible, and even if children committed a very low-level crime, they could be put to death. Since then, the justice system has gone through phases of accepting the death sentence for children, to banning the death sentence for children under 18, and then banning the death sentence and life without parole for children completely. Many of these children have not had a fair chance in the system and have been punished for crimes that others may have done, so this problem must be fixed. Although most people would say that juveniles should be punished for their crimes, the community should be better involved in helping these children to know that these crimes are not allowed, and if they are committed, the community should be there to help these children learn from their mistakes.
The United States sentences more juveniles to death than any other nation in the world (Justice, 2009) and our juveniles are being sentenced as young as ten years of age. These are juveniles being tried as adults, and something has to change and change fast. The younger generation is supposed to be our future leaders. How will our juveniles or the citizens of this country prevail if this continues we won’t be able to because most of our future leaders will be prisoner. (B, 2005)
There is much debate over whether or not juveniles should ever be tried as adults. Juveniles are defined as children under the age of 18. In the past, juveniles have been tried in a separate juvenile court because of their age. However, trying juveniles as adults for violent crimes is a trend that is on the rise. Age is supposed to be a deterrent for placing those under 18 on trial and giving them stiffer punishments that are often reserved for adults. Many debate whether or not juveniles really should have less severe punishments or if trying some juveniles as adults will lower juvenile crime rates.
Minority mentally ill juveniles are discriminated in the detention facility.In the juvenile justice system have discriminated minority juvenile compear to Caucasian juveniles. In where most of the time Caucasian juveniles are sent to a mental institution while minority juveniles that have a mentally ill problem do not have the same treatment. Minority juveniles that have a mentally ill problem are sent to a detention facility. However, “Youth of color are less likely than whites to receive mental health treatment before entering the juvenile justice system(Simone S. Hicks,2011).” In this quote, the reader should understand that juveniles that are not white are treated as second class citizens. For Example; mentally ill juvenile that is Latino
These individual rights must be effectively balanced against these present and emerging community concerns: Widespread drug abuse among youth The threat of juvenile crime Urban gang violence High-technology, computer, and Internet crime (cybercrime) Terrorism and narcoterrorism Occupational and whitecollar crime
Because he was a minor, he was released early, and less then two years later, He murdered his ex-girlfriend and her two children. The magazine says this is proof that harsh punishment, like a real jail, are necessary. But, really this is just proof that sending minors to a juvenile facility can prevent this from occurring. They can give counseling and support that adult jails can’t provide. They should’ve sent the boy to a facility, where he could’ve changed his life
Murder is always a devastating sight, juveniles who commit homicides is another story. Sentencing a juvenile to life without parole isn’t the best punishment for a child that is developing in life. Juveniles are full of built up steam and emotions, they aren't comprehensive with the actions they take.
On April, 9th in Pittsburgh, PA, student Alex Hribal, 16, brought two 10 inch knives to school. Alex stabbed twenty-one students and also the schools adult security guard. County Detectives got a warrant to search the Hribal home. It was known that Alex was a gamer, there was several gaming items taken from him home (Gittens).But the most strange thing on the list is a very common kitchen item: A Chicago Cutlery wooden block knife holder with two of the knives missing. He is being charged as an adult. According to Crimesider Staff/AP the sophomore was being originally charged with four counts of attempted homicide, but 17 more counts have been added. He is now being charged with 21 counts of aggravated assault, and also four counts of homicide. Alex’s lawyer, has said “his client has no history of mental health problems, has not been in trouble with the law and does not smoke marijuana or drink”(Connor).
“I think it's important for us as a society to remember that the youth within juvenile justice systems are, most of the time, youths who simply haven't had the right mentors and supporters around them because of circumstances beyond their control,” (qtd. in Brainy Quotes) are wise words from Q'orianka Kilcher, a human rights activist. Many Americans feel adolescents should be held accountable for their behavior; however, trying them as if they are adults is not always the optimum course of action. Because the teenage brain matures from back to front, the prefrontal cortex is not established until mid-twenties. Ordinarily adolescents can be rehabilitated in order to avert future offending; yet when tried as an adult, all hope for rehabilitation is lost. A one time mistake will follow an adolescent around for the rest of his/her life, dramatically decreasing the opportunities for success. Trying adolescents as adults is an injustice due to their lack of rationality and potential for rehabilitation.
When a person is charged with a crime, many people don't think that the age of said person is important because in their minds a criminal should be charged according to the law and not according to his or age. I believe that juveniles should not be tried as adults because trying them as adults affects them in ways that it does more harm than good for them and their community. The first effect of juveniles being tried as adults is that it “alters the legal process by which a
The Acting Brooklyn District Attorney disclosed that an East New York man, his girlfriend and another woman have been charged in a 24 - count prosecution with promoting three underage girls as prostitutes.
Juveniles committing crimes is not a new issued being introduced to society; actually, it has been an issue for centuries. However, the big question is, should juveniles be tried in adult courts? Before answering, take into consideration every possible scenario that could have led them to commit the crime. For instance, were they the leader in the act? Did they participate in the crime? Was the juvenile even aware of what was taking place? Were they peer pressured? Did they have any other choice at the time? There are so many other questions we could consider when making a decision here.
Thousands of youths have to go through the Juvenile Justice System every year. Sentencing is unfairly given to many of these youths that end up going through The Juvenile Justice System has become a school for criminals. The sentencing has become biased. Barry C. Feld is one of the nation's leading scholars of Juvenile Justice. He received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Pennsylvania, his J.D. from the University of Minnesota, and his Ph.D. in sociology from Harvard University where he was a Russel Sage Foundation Fellow in Law and the Social Sciences ( “Feld, Berry | University of Minnesota Law School,” n.d.). He wrote the article Justice for Juveniles. Justice for Juveniles is an article outlining various issues and solutions
“I used to believe are our future but now I realize that this, sadly isn’t the reality. Through laws that treat kids like adults, the government is throwing away the future of children in this country.” (D. Lee) An estimated 200,000 juveniles are tried as adults. The term juvenile refers to any young person under the age of 18. For most states in the United States, the age of majority is 18. While there are many things that juveniles are unable to do until they reach the age of 18, being charged as an adult for a crime is not amongst those things in some states. Juveniles are not allowed to vote, drink alcohol, or sign a legal contract, yet they can be charged and treated like adults when it comes to them being