K-1 Immigration

First, they must pass a health-screening process beforehand. In Canada, health screening was implemented to ensure that no immigrant becomes a burden on health or social services or “is a danger to public health or safety” (Government of Canada, 2002:np). Canada has no list of diseases that will automatically disqualify would-be immigrants, but infectious conditions such as HIV-AIDS can decrease their chances of acceptance (Zencovich, Kennedy, MacPherson, & Gushulak 2006). Screening does not guarantee that the host country will receive immigrants that are healthier than its own citizens, but it does ensure that people with serious health problems are not allowed to immigrate; consequently, the cohort of immigrants coming to North America tends to be healthy.

The Irish experience in the U.S. was harsh. They fled Ireland due to the Potato Famine, and arrived here for opportunity, and even more importantly, a better life. They were also exceedingly poor, so that being

While reading The Immigration Kaleidoscope: Knowing the Immigrant Family Next Door I could not help but think back to when I was working in the restaurant industry. A lot of the kitchen workers had immigrated to America from various countries but mostly Mexico. One of my favorite coworkers Anna, who moved to America from Mexico to send money back to her family, forcing her to leave her young daughter behind.

The process of immigrating to the U.S. involves more than one pathway and extensive requirements.

Imagine traveling overseas without your parents.And there are millions of strangers around you. In the late 1800s, immigrants changed life in the u.s. By bringing new cultural traditions and a dramatic increase in the population. Many people left their countries left to escape war and the great irish potato famine some others left because they needed a job. The presence of so many new immigrants changed the u.s. Forever.

Transcontinental railroad- railroad that connects both sides of the us and provides jobs and increases exports

We help individuals obtain green cards through several categories that will allow for self-sponsored petitions, including EB-1 Extraordinary Ability petitions and EB2-National Interest Waivers.

Although, the immigration reform needs to be changed, America must not loose track that this nation was once founded by immigrants. Of course, the government must find a way to tighten security at every border, but not all immigrants come to our country to cause problems. This great country is still the land of opportunity, and doors are open too whom ever chooses to walk through them. On top of that, some immigrants are forced to migrate to the U.S. For instance, thousands of Syrians come to the West to get away from the scrutiny that their country is suffering from. They find themselves in a middle of a war, and having to deal with a group of terrorist called "ISIS". This is a terrorist group that has no regard for life, and inflicts terror

The United States is known as the country of opportunity, liberty and equality. People come to the United States to give themselves and their children an opportunity to live a better life than the one they had. When Donald Trump became president, many people became fearful of what would happen to them, especially those of Hispanic descent and people from Muslim countries. President Trump started working on changing the immigration policies. According to the Migration Policy Institute, approximately 13.5% (43.3 million) of the U.S. population are immigrants, documented and undocumented, and those are only the ones that the government knows about. Some are deported to México or to their homeland for other reasons such as murdering, illegal trafficking,

USCIS will process your I-129F petition and then forward it to the U.S. Department of State (DOS) for consular processing. Followed by that, the K-3 and K-4 visa beneficiaries will need to apply for K-3 and K-4 visas to the

Dating as far back as the revolution, Americans have always rallied around the concept of change. Occupy Wall Street, though a unorganized protest, has successfully created a stir throughout the nation by demanding modifications to society. Among the many appeals, the demonstration insist on “open borders migration” which would enable easier immigration between countries, in this case it would be Mexico and the United States. Republicans and Democrats are split on how correctly solve this seemingly unsolvable issue. The Republican Party is in no way attempting to meet this demand; however, the Democratic Party’s is trying to implement reforms in the immigration process, which is a step towards accomplishing the protest’s goal. I believe that the best way to meet Occupy Wall Street’s demand is to have a mix of the two parties’ solution. This conflict between the two parties is significant because it can lead to a complete halt in creating a solution.

In other words, sham or fake marriage is a marriage of opportunity or convenience entered only for the advantages that come with the status. In fact, U.S. immigration doesn’t define marriage fraud or any terms relayed to it, like “spouse” or “wife.” Nevertheless, USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) will deny any immigration petition if the alien has in the past, or is currently attempting to “enter into marriage for the purpose of evading the immigration laws” (I.N.A. Section 204©). In order to deal with such a high level of circumvention, Congress has approved new rulings. These gave more power to U.S. immigration officials to inspect the reasons behind the marriage fraud, as well as to punish those who attempt to break the law and enter into a fake marriage; However, A. Schuetz claims that “immigration policy has shifted its focus from family reunification to strict enforcement of “illegal” immigration” (97), and that entire process of adjustment of legal status has turned into much more complicated procedure. The Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986 (IMFA) is an example of changed policy. Where uniting families was less of a priority and growing fear of illegal entry through marriage took

Despite the recession formally ended in June 2009, the American economy had been growing at a rate of 2%, about one percentage point below its long-term average. The author say that we need lots of capable people to solve this problem and immigration is the quick way to get such people and a market-based immigration system can encourage immigration.

Applicants for "lawful permanent residence" in the United States generally enter through one of four channels. Family reunification is the largest of these channels and accounts for approximately two-thirds of total permanent immigration to the U.S. every year. The other channels are employment-based immigration, refugees and asylum seekers, and diversity-based immigration (also known as the lottery). These four categories account for more than 99 percent of immigration into the U.S.” .

Immigration has become both a controversial and widely debatable topic in contemporary governmental affairs. Within David Miller’s Immigration: The Case for Limits, we are faced with many trivial ideas on what constitutes the opportunity for people to legally immigrate to where they please, how matters are dealt with in the case of refugees, and to what level we hold everyone’s right to make a living. As I was investing myself in Miller’s book excerpt, I became aware of several debatable and agreeable content sections that stuck out to me. For instance, Miller states that “There is something fundamentally unfair about a world in which people are condemned to relative poverty through no fault of their own when others have much greater opportunities, whereas if people were free to live and work wherever they wished, then each person could choose whether to stay in the community that raised him or look for a better life elsewhere.”; I believe that Miller is correct in stating this fact due to the idea that everyone is entitled to make themselves the most well off that they can. However, a problem arises when Miller states that the basic rights consist of freedom, security, etc., and proclaims that freedom of movement is also a basic human right. I find fault in this because for most Miller’s conversation about immigrants (excluding refugees) it seems as if he is approaching the scope without putting his previous statements into perspective. He seems to contradict himself when