Kale And Mccullough Summary

Wilmot and Hocker defines conflict as being, “an expressive struggle between at least two interdependent people with incompatible goals, scarce resources and interference from achieving a specific goal”. ( ) Conflicts are inevitable, these conflicts can arise in intimate relationships, between parents and children, between siblings, in friendships and in the work place. While conflicts will never cease to exist, they can evolve into very complex creatures, and as "most of us are notoriously inaccurate at describing our own behavior in a conflict"(p. 129). There has become a great need for an assessment model to begin to thoroughly understand all of the elements that play into complexities of conflict. The Hocker-Wilmot Conflict Assessment Guide is so important because it aides us in describing the nature of conflict, this include; its history, precipitating events, the parties ' assumptions about conflict in general, the conflict elements, and past or potential transformations of those elements. Additionally, conflict styles are addressed, as is the perceptions of the opposing view, and the style of the system as a whole. The guide assesses the role of power in the conflict, describing the parties ' attitudes toward power, their areas of dependency and sources of power, their view of the balance of power, any unrecognized sources of power, and whether destructive forms of power balancing are occurring. The assessment should describe the parties ' goals, their

There will always be conflicts in our daily lives. However, in our readings, conflict does not have to be negative; apparently, it depends on the circumstances, conflicts can be absolute. According to our text, the conflict has a way to convert energy to positive social learning. "Without conflict, attitudes, behavior, and relationships will always stay the same, regardless of whether they are fair" (Tubbs, 2012, p. 325). Positive conflicts can help to eliminate the issue or the cause of the problem. According to our text about "groupthink," which represents a form of social influence of the majority that results in a dangerous level of agreement by

The three factors selected as identifiers (dominance, avoidance, and compromise) were chosen because they make up the majority of individual conflict styles and they categorically encompass a number of goal-driven behaviors found in a conflict at varying degrees. However, it’s important to note that all three of these behaviors can have both positive and negative consequences in the context of the conflict in the same way that “both avoidance and engagement are workable options in different circumstances” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014, p. 150).

Conflicts, whether between individuals or groups, happen when “basic needs are unmet and when the two sides to the conflict… believe that the other is responsible for this deprivation” (Auerbach, 2009, p. 293). The two protagonists view the dispute through “the prism of their respective” narrative, resulting in each side seeing itself as “entitled to all rights” of the issues. Auerbach says there is a narrative framework for conflicts in using the “reconciliation pyramid” to discuss disputes and come to resolution. There are seven levels, and five assumptions, in this pyramid and it is followed from the base to the top. The process requires “reconciliation, meaning changing attitudes from denial and resentment to acceptance and trust” to be able to find peace between the sides. It also “incorporates both warm and cold steps” because no conflict resolution will have purely

However, there exist other forms of conflicts than just the individual’s struggle that deserve attention. Furthermore, it is crucial to evaluate how ‘no conflict’ is achieved.

Another research study examined the dynamics of different groups and how conflict can be studied by understanding these dynamics. Groups that adapt a cooperative style to functioning together view conflict as a common issue that needs to be addressed as a group. (Somech et al, 2009) On the other hand, groups that chose a more competitive approach tend to perceive conflict as a conflict of interest where one member's personal interests and goals may have a significant distance from the rest of the group. Teams where individuals are cooperative view conflict resolution as more beneficial to the entire group and understands that this will allow the group to perform well and complete it tasks. However, in order for groups to be cooperative, individual members need to share the same perspective and resonate with a strong team identity. (Somech et al, 2008) It is only when members of the group have a strong sense of team identity are they able to perceive conflicts as a mutual problem that needs to be resolved to benefit the team. Individuals will need to set aside differences in opinions and interests and construct resolutions that would positively affect the group.

In the process of task conflict, group members may use emotionally harsh language (Pelled, 1996), intimidation tactics, or ad homonym arguments. Facial expressions and gestures, tone of voice, and other nonverbal elements may become emotionally charged as individuals propose and defend their own views while disagreeing with those of others ( Young & Mossholder, 2004). Participants can feel bruised, humiliated, offended, or even brutalized by the debate tactics of other group members (REF). The hurt feelings that result from poorly managed or expressed task conflict can easily stimulate relationship conflict for two closely related reasons. Harsh language is particularly likely to invoke an attribution of relationship conflict. Scholars have

This paper will talk about what The Conflict Theory is, and who it was derived from. It will also give, and explain an example of what The Conflict Theory pertains to in modern society.

In our education system, conflict and the methods of conflict management influences different groups (students and employees), individual and even the performance and effectiveness of the institution. Conflicts are realities of life. They occur whether we like it or not, especially when there is disagreement and misunderstanding which stands as major key characteristics of human relationships. The relationship could be domestic, national or international (Spiroska, 2014). Furthermore, conflicts happen when people are incompatible.

Through the integration of participants' perspectives, interests, belief systems and values, conflict and conflict resolution play important roles in individual and social evolution and development. Conflict arises when one or more participants view the current system as not working. At least one party is sufficiently dissatisfied with the status quo that they are willing to own the conflict and speak up with the hope of being able to influence the situation to arrive at an improved condition. Conflict may be viewed as a process we put ourselves through to achieve a new condition and self-definition.

Conflict is natural and unavoidable in human interactions. It may possess both negative and positive characteristics in its ability to hinder task performance by creating hostility, as well as enhancing decision making, creativity, and innovation among team members. Therefore, the ways in which we deal with conflict are

Conflict is an inevitable part of human interaction. However, the way people deal with conflict is largely linked with the outcome of the conflict resolution. Many studies have been conducted to analyze the different styles of conflict management and resolution as Tou, Baker, Hadden and Lin (2015) write. “Consequently, the increasing amount of research conducted on the

The term conflict has been used in different ways, or with different forms (e.g. racial, ethnic, religious, political, marital, personal, etc.),or at different levels (e.g. within the individual, between individuals, between groups, between organizations, between nations, etc.) and in different contexts (e.g. at home, in organizations, on the battlefield, etc.). Conflict is often seen as aggressive and hence a destructive phenomenon. It is generally understood as something that has to be coped with and solved. However, conflict can also be understood as a constructive process with positive consequences (Iborra2004, McWhirter 1999, 2000). From a developmental point of view, conflict can help us “to solve ourselves”(Iborra & Santamaría 2006). This means that conflict is also considered a chance for personal development.

Conflict is opposition or antagonism toward other individuals or things (Hegar, Human Relations at Work, pg 480). For example, if your co-worker was given an award for outstanding work performance but you feel that you were more deserving of the award. Now there is a conflict between you two. Even if you do feel like you are more deserving, you should still try and keep that to yourself and get your work done. Holding that type of animosity just creates more conflict. Two types of conflict that are important in human relations are conflict at the individual level and conflict at the organizational level. When needs of individuals are at odds conflict can develop. The reasons for this are frustration and interpersonal conflict. Some of our biggest frustrations come from the workplace. It may be because we feel that our work in unfulfilling, co-workers that we don’t get along with demanding structures within the organization that seem to micromanage us. In most instances we feel that our options for real fulfillment at work are limited which creates conflict inside us. Intrapersonal conflict occurs when a person or group of people frustrates or interferes with another person’s efforts at achieving a goal (Hegar, Human Relations

There are various types of conflict and guidelines to effectively resolve conflict to which they are addressed.