Kant's Unconditional Moral Obligation

Kant argues that mere conformity with the moral law is not sufficient for moral goodness. I will argue that Kant is right. In this essay I will explain why Kant distinguishes between conforming with the moral law and acting for the sake of the moral law, and what that distinction means to Kant, before arguing why Kant was right.

Another topic that Kant contributed to is morality. According to Kant, moral laws cannot be derived from human nature. To put it in other terms, it is not human nature that should be used as a model to how we should behave morally. Kant believed that humans do not always make the right moral decisions because human nature can be flawed at times, often times choosing an animalistic desire over doing something that is morally permissible. In addition, Kant believed that the outcome of human nature is not the central issue when it comes to knowing what is right or what is wrong. Instead, Kant believes that it each of the individual actions that should be analyzed to see if it is morally wrong or if it is morally right. Kant’s point of view about morality is different from previous philosophers, because most of them looked to human nature in order to find the morally right things to do.

The categorical imperative suggests that a course of action must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The course of action taken can also be reasoned by its ability to be seen as a universal law. Universal laws have been deemed as unconditional commands that are binding to everyone at all times. Kant

Morrison (2011) writes Immanuel Kant founded duty-based ethics, also known as deontology. Kant believed that everything can be used for good, but could also be used for evil. Kant also believed good will is the only good that can exist without clarification. Good will does not give benefit to the person choosing it. Morrison (2011) explains one cannot be ethical if using people to get what they want based on the Kantian view. Additionally, the consequences of the action or the end-result of the action should not be part of the process of decision-making. Kant theorizes what is good and right for one person should be good and right for everyone. Kant’s theory deals in absolutes and does not consider complex issues (Morrison, 2011).

Premature birth; as characterized by Merriam-Webster word reference may be, "the end of a pregnancy after, joined by, bringing about, or nearly taken after by the passing of the incipient organism or hatchling. This is the meaning of fetus removal of which I will survey its moral status. After Roe versus Swim, the Supreme Court at the same time chose that ladies have the privilege of security under the fourteenth amendment; making it adequate to prematurely end a pregnancy inside the primary trimester (Vaughn 119). The fundamental contention on fetus removal is truly a civil argument on human life, and whether it has an incentive from the snapshot of origination. Every single human life is made out of inborn esteem, and has the privilege to

Categorical imperative is based on a maxim, a reason for having acted one way or principle of an action. Maxim is broken into two parts that should be taken into consideration before acting, what are you about to do and why are you about to do it. Taking this into consideration will allow us, humans; to reduce

As previously mentioned, categorical imperative is defined as the unconditional moral obligation to perform actions that go beyond individual feelings and purposes.

According to Kant, an action can only be morally right when it is motivated by duty alone, as opposed to being motivated by duty and emotion combined or just pure emotion (Kant, Groundwork, 397). In order to defend this statement, I will begin with explaining Kant’s view of morality and what kind of judgments we make in order to discover what morality is and how it relates to the moral law. I will then proceed to explain how Kant defines duty and how it relates to having a good will. Finally, I will explain what exactly the moral law commands and tie it back in to why morally correct actions are purely motivated by duty.

Categorical Imperative is an ethical theory, which focuses on decisions that are both moral and rational. This theory takes universal laws in consideration and focuses on rules, principles, duty and goodwill. This theory is basically based on our ability to act as rational human beings.

Davis, C. W., Sr. (2017). “Ethics and Universal Truths.” ethics is, “a set of principles which apply to all humans” (“Universal Ethics,” 2017). Universal ethics consist of four things it is, universal, comprehensive, logical, and non-random. A Universal Ethic is free of personal, and cultural views. Universal ethics are nonspecific and apply to everyone. Many universal ethics are self-evident, but others are more complicated. When talking about universal ethics, the question of existence constantly rises. What is humankind? Why does it exist? What is it here to do? Universal ethics cannot answer these questions, but rather provide us with a “Moral Constitution” for life, that of which is accepted by all human beings (“Universal Ethics,” 2017).

Treating individuals as always as ends and never as means to an end it the primary obligation in Deontology theories. It means to recognize that the client’s value does not depend on anything else - it does not depend on whether they are having an affair or being fully committed into fixing their marriage. Value is not dependent on what the client does/did. Therefore the therapist approach should be solely based on the sense of duty to act in a way that is right and so leaving her biases aside. In fact, every individual has different sense of morality on certain topics such as in this case, extramarital relationship, and so what is right and what is wrond is determied by its conformity with a moral norm. According to Kantians’s theory, what

Again, the reading from Kant proves difficult to read. However, the part discussing examples of duties I found to be quite interesting. In relation to the last example when it mentions that all human beings should help others in need, I came to question if people actually carry out this duty throughout all aspects of their life? I also questioned when people do assist others in need, if they actively think and register their actions as a duty since as human beings we have a moral responsibility to help others.

Categorical imperative is the notion in Kant’s moral philosophy which can be defined as the highest principle of morality. The notion of categorical imperative was introduced by Kant in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and had been studied in detail in his Critique of Practical

This viewpoint advanced by Kant is further expounded upon in his essay "Our Duties to Animals". Here he explains that we have no direct duties to animals because they are not self-conscious, rational moral agents. Instead we have indirect duties to human beings in regards to animals. We should therefore not be cruel to animals because "he who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men."# According to Kant, " we can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals."#

Kant believed that the categorical imperative is binding on all rational creatures, regardless of their specific goals or desires and regardless of the consequences.