Kathryn Schulz Unjust Evidence Essay

The Justice system seeks to prevent crimes and to capture those who have committed crimes. But what are the causes of crime, maybe poverty, or greed, or is sometimes caused by the system. Is the risk worth the reward and is reward the worth risking the punishment? Power and influence is threaded deeply into the Criminal Justice System. Are all offenders caught and processed with the same demeanor and given the same punishment? The system needs to be impartial to all offenders regardless of the offender’s social position, job or yearly income. The general punishment for most crimes is incarceration in most states with a difference in duration to adjust per each crime. This is the deterrent against crime. This is what should be keeping

“Evidence” by Kathryn Schulz Is an article about how accurate is the evidence that we have to form beliefs, an argues whether or not ours beliefs are true or “partially” true .She explains that what we only care about the probability that our answer might be true when solving a problem and we based that answer with our previously experiences in life. We used our inductive reasoning to make our best guess on every situation and she argues that or inductive reasoning is more complex than choosing a “probable “answer it contains “virtually all human cognition”. What stand out to me is what she later countered argues what she say before by saying that we learn language by inductive reasoning and that we did not have evidence to supported how we

Read Stereotyping Has Lasting Negative Impact: Prejudice has lingering effects, study shows and watch How Pre-existing Beliefs Distort Logical Reasoning.

Many laws that made up America are broken just for the way people treat each other. The Depression was a time when many laws were broken. The 14th amendment was violated when blacks were treated unequally. Black people were the main target during the depression because most people thought that people who were black could not have a better job than they had or even a job at all. In today's world there is definitely feelings of unequalness but it has gotten worse. There is no doubt that people are treating other people unfairly but it is all kinds of different people. For example there are unfair treatments people of different race, religion, and many other things. The treatment that people give to others is based only upon opinions that are

The Preamble to the United States Constitution poses a series of ideals intended as foci for the American people to uphold through the government; one such ideal is to “establish justice.” That is to say, elected representatives are to ensure the treatment of those under its jurisdiction is truthful, lawful, and fair. For successful fulfillment, this must be completely upheld across space and within all communities― essentially, it must be observed with equal opportunity in all areas of governed life.

John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at Stanford University, argues that everyone likes to prove themselves correct instead of being wrong. Scientists feel the same way, this is why a lot of scientists cite initial positive results even if they realize the results were disproven (463-464). Jonah also likes proving his arguments, but the problem with this author is the fact that he might not be correct. Jonah could be excluding the citations from his article because the real information from the sources could lead to a negative impact to Jonah’s

During the great pressure of segregation, Martin Luther King was arrested on a charge of parading without a permit, but this charge was abused to deny him his first amendment of peaceful assembly and protest. In Martin Luther King's, Letter To Birmingham, He wanted to create a better understanding of just and unjust laws. Therefore king is very conscientious when he addresses the issue of obeying laws, I agree with his assertion of just and unjust laws, because you have to understand what laws do not conflict with God given rights for them to be morally correct.

Martin Luther King’s criteria for distinguishing between just and unjust laws Socrates, a Greek philosopher, was ordered to be on trial and executed by the court. He was charged with corrupting the youth of Athens while he was only trying to deliver his progressive ideas about justice and morality. Plato, one of Socrates’ greatest students, recorded Socrates’ defense at the trial in the Apology. It is a justification and inspiration speech for the other philosophers. Martin Luther King Jr., the leader in the African American Civil Rights Movement, demonstrated his belief that Socrates was an example of breaking unjust law.

There comes a time, in most citizens’ lives when they must stand against their government to produce change. Change can only be acquired if people take the necessary actions for it to take place. Nelson Mandela was a historical revolutionist who helped his people in Africa, to revolt against the government, in order to bring about change. As a result, he was sentenced to prison for 27 years for trying to overthrow the government. Many revolutionist, such as Arundhati Roy and Martin Luther King Jr., explain in their essays how the role of the citizen is to stand against injustice, and how the government labels them as anti-national because of it.

What I have made of this idea is that It is important that we learn how to understand others ideas and beliefs without putting a wall up on just our own. This “Cuz its true” idea tends to make me think of my husband who fought in Iraq on several tours. When he arrived home he told me that they were so stuck on the idea that any and all Muslims were dangerous over in Iraq. It took him over 10 years to finally hear and partially believe that not Muslims are dangerous, by accepting to hear other facts and understand them. Schulz overall message here is that we all have a belief and it is very hard for the human mind to even entertain the idea of someone else’s opinions or

Is his argument valid? Perhaps the argument is valid, but it most certainly is unsound. It is part of skepticism to

Is there structural inequality in the criminal justice system? When we watch the news or read our newspapers, we can see that most of the criminals portrayed are of African American or Hispanic descent. Being a fan of true crime novels, they even depict more Black male criminals than White males. Are African American males committing more crimes than White males? What factors are involved for Blacks to be more involved in crime? How do African American stereotypes play a role with possible racial profiling from the policing force? Are Blacks treated fairly in the criminal justice system? After much research, I hope to answer these questions and determine if African Americans

To begin with, there are numerous reasons why many individuals, if not most, harbour the idea that (One side of argument). According to the recent researches conducted at The University of Queensland, it is proved that (Supporting example). This would lead to (Relate the example to the idea).

Folk psychology, is a branch of psychology that involves analyzing how people come to understand, explain, and predict the behaviors of others around them, through the use of propositional attitudes. However, according to Paul Churchland, and other eliminative materialist, folk psychology is nothing more than false stagnant theory. Eliminative materialist holds the strong view that folk-psychology is an outdated and radically false theory that should be disregarded and replaced with a more quantitative and methodical understanding of human behavior. In other words, it is the view that certain common-sense mental states, characterized by propositional attitudes, such as beliefs and desires, do not exist. In this paper, I will be analyzing Churchland’s argument against folk psychology and discussing objections to his claim.

The concept of access to justice embodies the formal conception on one side, and substantive conception on the other. The formal conception of access to justice is considered to indicate abilities of people to have access to courts of law and other tribunals in a reasonable and effective manner coupled with the opportunity to receive legal services from qualified professionals. Access to justice in this way embraces the concept of the equality before the law which is the foundation of human rights protection, and protects the poor and the vulnerable from deprivation and violation of their rights. The substantive conception of access to justice, on the other hand, refers to people's ability to attain a substantive legal outcome. The substantive